Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

[Shak]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Huma

And you’re calling merc illogical?

@TLK

once, Shak had too many burritos, and because of that, gas explosion happened that knocked him off his feet. His phone camera recorded some blurry images of him falling down. I will try to find it and post it in ‘debunking shak’ thread

Debunking Shak will take a lot of time, I have many complex layers

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Shak09

Look at some videos of plane crashes pal, pre-2001, then tell me about blurs.

Can you find an equivalent plane crash in which a stationery camera captures a plane flying at 400-500mph into a building.

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Shak09

Lmao this!

Merc, humans aren’t blind. If its a plane they’ll know its a plane unless the plane is travelling as fast as a bullet.

Well the humans who were there saw a plane hitting the building.

No one claimed they saw a missile.

Its only you guys who made such an asburd claim and are now having to eat your words when you cannot prove it factually.

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

Anyways I am done.

Its fun debating with conspiracy lovers, but in the end they keep peddling the same old conspiracy theories which doesn’t have any factual basis to stand on.

On the next anniversary of 9/11, another thread will be started on 9/11 conspiracies with people peddling the same conspiracy mumbo jumbo which have been totally debunked.

[Shak]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@mercenary2k

Well you are using Cameras from 2012 vs 2001. There is a quantum leap in technological innovation. So use a 2001 era camera.

As for Pentagon Cameras, thats their security apparatus. All of their security is on the front end to prevent attacks from reaching the pentagon.

I am sorry if these simple facts confuse you.

I am sorry for the fact that you believe the Pentagon, USA’s nerve centre has no cameras facing that way. Public latreens in my Uni were more secure.

If you believe that then its laughable.

Secondly, you’re the one propping up this blur notion, the onus to prove it is upto you not me.

Anyways I am done.

Its fun debating with conspiracy lovers, but in the end they keep peddling the same old conspiracy theories which doesn’t have any factual basis to stand on.

LMAO! Merc’s ‘‘factual’’ basis include arguing:

• The most sensitive buliding in the USA does not have rear cameras, when even a latreen in a market does.
• Another ‘‘factual’’ and so scientific evidence he’s provided is this ‘‘blur’’ theory.

You have us on the ropes buddy.

The fact you’re believing a story about KNOWN liars, liars who so so shamelessly lied infront of the whole world, says more about your thinking than mine.

[Huma_1]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

Latreen Haven’t heard that word in a while!

Ok I’m obviously derailing this very serious thread, adios!

[Shak]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Huma

Latreen Haven’t heard that word in a while!

I have more I can teach you my behooda vocab

[psyah]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

[TLK]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@mercenary2k

On the next anniversary of 9/11, another thread will be started on 9/11 conspiracies with people peddling the same conspiracy mumbo jumbo which have been totally debunked.

but you gonna be there to correct us, right? Wada karo.

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Shak09

I am sorry for the fact that you believe the Pentagon, USA’s nerve centre has no cameras facing that way. Public latreens in my Uni were more secure.

If you believe that then its laughable.

Secondly, you’re the one propping up this blur notion, the onus to prove it is upto you not me.

LMAO! Merc’s ‘‘factual’’ basis include arguing:

• The most sensitive buliding in the USA does not have rear cameras, when even a latreen in a market does.
• Another ‘‘factual’’ and so scientific evidence he’s provided is this ‘‘blur’’ theory.

You have us on the ropes buddy.

The fact you’re believing a story about KNOWN liars, liars who so so shamelessly lied infront of the whole world, says more about your thinking than mine.

Ok I can’t resist. Have to respond.

Maybe if your university has the same ground level of security when you enter it then you don’t need cameras right beside the building, only to cover entrances.

Since it doesn’t thats why there are cameras on the strucutre it self.

Pentagon’s Ground Level Security is far from the building where the security cameras, bomb detectors, guards, and other security mechanisms are in place. Same thing for the White House as well and even the New York Stock Exchange.

The Pentagon has cameras which only covers the entrances and one of those cameras caught the plane hitting the building.

But keep believing your loony conspiracy theories.

[psyah]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

I don’t see a blur … I see a clear image of “not aeroplane” … And another clear image of explosion … And a missing intermediate clip … The two images were more than 2 seconds aparts, but the footage puts them side by side.

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@TLK

but you gonna be there to correct us, right? Wada karo.

No, I will just save a link to this thread and point you guys here.

[Enigmatic]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

Sigh. We dunno what happened. If it was a missile, plane or even a giant stupid bird sent by Aliens from Neptune. All I now know is the aftermath has been terrible..and probably the worst for Pakistan

[TLK]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@psyah

I don’t see a blur … I see a clear image of not aeroplane … And another clear image of explosion …

but merc2k sees a plane, and his observation counts, not yours.

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@psyah

I don’t see a blur … I see a clear image of “not aeroplane” … And another clear image of explosion … And a missing intermediate clip … The two images were more than 2 seconds aparts, but the footage puts them side by side.

As for the video tape, it records every other second.

Here is the video which debunkes plane hitting pentagon conspiracy mumbo jumbo

911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 - YouTube

And now I am done

[Shak]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@mercenary2k

Ok I can’t resist. Have to respond.

Maybe if your university has the same ground level of security when you enter it then you don’t need cameras right beside the building, only to cover entrances.

Since it doesn’t thats why there are cameras on the strucutre it self.

Pentagon’s Ground Level Security is far from the building where the security cameras, bomb detectors, guards, and other security mechanisms are in place. Same thing for the White House as well and even the New York Stock Exchange.

The Pentagon has cameras which only covers the entrances and one of those cameras caught the plane hitting the building.

But keep believing your loony conspiracy theories.

LOL. That garbage quality of the camera is used for Pentagon’s security? You believe that.

Again, there is no blur, because there ain’t a plane. An andha insaan can see that.

As for your last line, I think the fact I don’t believe liars who have caused a million deaths unlike you means one of us does believe in loony theories. That ain’t me.

[psyah]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@TLK

but merc2k sees a plane, and his observation counts, not yours.

Which split second does he actually see the plane?

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@TLK

but merc2k sees a plane, and his observation counts, not yours.

Yeap, if you freeze frame the video, you see a blur image of a plane.

Its not only my observation but every credible person.

Let me ask you this, if there was no video of planes hitting the WTC, would you have believed that planes hit WTC ?

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Shak09

LOL. That garbage quality of the camera is used for Pentagon’s security? You believe that.

Again, there is no blur, because there ain’t a plane. An andha insaan can see that.

As for your last line, I think the fact I don’t believe liars who have caused a million deaths unlike you means one of us does believe in loony theories. That ain’t me.

Here:

911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 - YouTube

[Shak]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@TLK

but merc2k sees a plane, and his observation counts, not yours.

I agree, we’re all just loons for not believing the ever so trustable Bush and his gov’s story.

Just like we were derided for questioning their version of Iraq.