Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

[mercenary2k]

Re: Questions about 9/11 that you still dont have answers to

@Shak09

a) Alleged hijackers alive:

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well

From BBC News

That News Story was Debunked. Are you really that desperate?

Can you please post a VIDEO which shows the hijackers being interviewed?

Thanks

@Shak09

b) Pentagon- Maybe its my new glasses but I don’t see a plane anywhere, do you? **What is stopping the government releasing the CCTV videos? **If the claims are stupid then release the videos and shut us nutters up.

The Plane was going at 400-500 mph, so obviously the plane would appear to go by in a split second.

I am confused by your logic If the Jews and Americans managed to fly remote control planes by Mossad and fly them into WTC, why can’t they do the same to the Pentagon? Why use a missile? Or the planes that hit WTC were not planes at all but holographic projections being overlayed on missiles?

Or the WTC never existed? Those were Hollywood Special Effects that showed that those buildings were actually there but they never were.

@Shak09

c) So them claiming the hijackers are dead is a lie, as proved by the link. Which equally then makes the whole notion of passports surviving in a blaze that vaporised metal equally hilarious

That link proved nothing. It was de-bunked later on.

Waleed Al-Shehri Still Alive

Paper behaves differently. It can float in air. There were thousands of paper that littered New York when those planes hit.

@Shak09

I think I did, all I had to do was a basic google search to prove your whole hijacker point a lie. Maybe you won’t find researching stuff for us simpletons boring if you actually did research before posting.

All you proved is how bereft of facts that your arguments is.

The more that I debate this issue with you, the more my point is proven.

Thanks for that

@Shak09

Nah, I think I can prove you wrong all by myself

You didn’t prove didly squat.

The more that I debate this issue with you, the more my point is proven.

Thanks for that