Protests mark Women’s Day in India

[Punjabee_in_USA]

^ Are you saying

1-Indian people are to be blamed if an extremist and criminal of humanity is elected as PM?

or

2-Are you saying that people of Pakistan should not be blamed for any bad person comes without people's will to rule Pakistan?;)

Read my post again slowly...

If people have elected and endorsed Modi, it is due to his track record of development and despite his "supposed" involvement in the Gujarat riots.

India is a democracy and the majority prevails ;) People choose who the want and not based on what Pakistanis think.

[diwana]

Read my post again slowly...

If people have elected and endorsed Modi, it is due to his track record of development and despite his "supposed" involvement in the Gujarat riots.

India is a democracy and the majority prevails ;) People choose who the want and not based on what Pakistanis think.

No sir,

My post and questions were not based on your single post.

if people ignore the heinous crime track record then what should we label those people?

There was a reason why Sonia Gandhi called him 'Merchant of Death" (Maut ka Saudagar)

You mentioned Pakistan had half the time un-elected govt. and boasted about the election system in India. So there you go. I asked you questions based on your statements.

You also have changed your stance in this post by saying as if someone wanted someone elected in India based on Pakistani wishes. Not seen in your posts above.

**Your posts :

rightly have acquitted Pakistani people from having bad rulers.

And also have placed a lot of legit doubts about Hindus who keep electing this monster.
**

What you said in posts above was boasting election of a criminal and I asked you perfectly legitimate questions which you are dodging.

I must say you have a good courage to accept that Indian people from Gujarat have third time elected a criminal of humanity who has been humiliated by the international community enough that this cruel man was not allowed to travel to U.S. and had his visa even canceled.

You or those who elected him may have a different agenda but the truth is that this man is not just a right winger. He is an extremist and a criminal of humanity. He has been buddy buddy with extremist Baal Thackeray and has won elections based on hindu extremist majority place of Gujarat.

Everyone knows Gujarat is an extremist Hindu place most of whom are strictly vegetarians.

[mYsTeRiOuS_gUy]

@Punjabee_in_USA

Where do you get your information from ?

BJP is a rightwing poitical party and not an extremist party. What BJP’s role was in Gujarat is still being debated with two committees headed by eminent judges having come out with entirely different conclusions.

The whole India knows that BJP is hindu extremist party, there is very few non muslims in that party. I know there was one muslim (Shahnawaz) in that party who gets criticised by all the muslims in India. BJP has very close links with hardcore extremist parties such as VHP, RSS, Bajrang Dal etc. Maybe you need to get YOUR information from a better source.

Whether Modi becomes PM or not is a matter of speculation, but if he does it will be for his track record of governance in Gujarat . During his time, the state has seen unprecedented economic growth which has helped both Hindus & Muslims. No one has ever endorsed his “supposed” role in the Gujarat riots.

Economic growth had nothing to do with MODI just like governments can’t be blamed for current financial crisis. Modi has always been an extremist from his student days, Americans banned his entry to US because they knew he was a nutcase and so did whole India but his negative image did NOT have any impact, he actually won with even heavier majority which shows that Indian supported his actions. Read the following article and see why Modi won election :

Narendra Modi's victory in Gujarat

(Only providing Indian sources)

Yes, that happens only in India since India is a democracy unlike our western neighbor and people are free to choose whichever leader they want

People are surely free to choose and it clearly shows that Indian people support a hindu extremist who loves killing innocent muslims so nothing to be proud of there

http://www.panthic.org/news/129/ARTICLE/4776/2009-02-27.html
Read this latest article on who is Modi, which party he represents and what does that party want, come back and report to me if you have learnt something new about BJP being a extremist party.

Here is something you shouldn’t miss in that article

Names like Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, and Indira Gandhi are well known in the global community. But exactly who is Narindera Modi? Narindera a native of Gujarat is a high ranking member of the fanatical Hindutva group, the BJP party. The party’s political ideology preaches the message of “Hindi Hindu Hindustan.” Hindu Nationalists believe that the ethnically and religiously diverse India should be Hinduized. All should become Hindus and speak Hindi. Those who refuse to assimilate to Hindu ideals should be dealt with, degraded, tormented, and destroyed

[Raj_ind]

The whole India knows that BJP is hindu extremist party, there is very few non muslims in that party. I know there was one muslim (Shahnawaz) in that party who gets criticised by all the muslims in India. BJP has very close links with hardcore extremist parties such as VHP, RSS, Bajrang Dal etc. Maybe you need to get YOUR information from a better source.

Well BJP is a right wing political party and has links with extremist organizations. There is no doubt about that.

[quote]

Economic growth had nothing to do with MODI just like governments can't be blamed for current financial crisis. Modi has always been an extremist from his student days, Americans banned his entry to US because they knew he was a nutcase and so did whole India but his negative image did NOT have any impact, he actually won with even heavier majority which shows that Indian supported his actions.

[/quote]

Absolutely wrong and biased statement. Why it shows that Indians supported his actions? dont U know that BJP was uprooted from power in the elections which were held in 2004? For this U can hold Indians responsible. And Modi was elected from Gujrat which contributes even less than 5% of whole Indian population. Plz be honest and correct ur statement.

[quote]
People are surely free to choose and it clearly shows that Indian people support a hindu extremist who loves killing innocent muslims so nothing to be proud of there ;)

[/quote]

Again false statement, It were not 1100 million Indians who chose modi but a small state of Gujrat which did. Its just like saying that coz U are a muslim therefore U are a terrorist, plz refrain from any such statement.

[quote]

*Names like Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, and Indira Gandhi are well known in the global community. But exactly who is Narindera Modi? Narindera a native of Gujarat is a high ranking member of the *fanatical Hindutva group, the BJP party. The party’s political ideology preaches the message of “Hindi Hindu Hindustan.” Hindu Nationalists believe that the ethnically and religiously diverse India should be Hinduized. All should become Hindus and speak Hindi. Those who refuse to assimilate to Hindu ideals should be dealt with, degraded, tormented, and destroyed **

[/quote]

It is a funny statement and doesnt deserve even a refutation. I m talking about later part of ur statement which speaks of crap like all should become hindus and blah blah. These kind of ppls are not found in India, even Modi cant dare talk like this. btw do U believe in whatever is written there in any article on the nets?

And never forget that inspite of all the unfortunate and tragic incident of Gujrat, muslims are still living in Gujrat with their all social, political and religious rights intact. This speaks about the power of secular India, even Modis cant undermine it as I said earlier too.

Peace

[mYsTeRiOuS_gUy]

[quote]

Again false statement, It were not 1100 million Indians who chose modi but a small state of Gujrat which did. Its just like saying that coz U are a muslim therefore U are a terrorist, plz refrain from any such statement.
[/quote]

How is it a false statement?? 1100 million people did NOT vote for Modi because they are not supposed to vote for someone outside their state, only Gujratis could vote for him and they did that in large numbers.
I did NOT say that all Indians are extremists or anything, it was in response to what " Punjabi in USA" said.

[quote]

It is a funny statement and doesnt deserve even a refutation. I m talking about later part of ur statement which speaks of crap like all should become hindus and blah blah. These kind of ppls are not found in India, even Modi cant dare talk like this. btw do U believe in whatever is written there in any article on the nets?
[/quote]

You seem to be a good person and that's why you think there are no such people in India, unfortunately there are a lot of people like that in India (you will be shocked to know), i have watched documentaries on Indian tv, it was a hindu who took hidden camera to interview a HINDU leader and he revealed how they were planning attack against muslims, what weapons they were secretly building etc. I am at work so you can google it if you want or check youtube.

[Raj_ind]

[quote]

Posted by mYsTeRiOuS_gUy
How is it a false statement?? 1100 million people did NOT vote for Modi because they are not supposed to vote for someone outside their state, only Gujratis could vote for him and they did that in large numbers.
I did NOT say that all Indians are extremists or anything, it was in response to what " Punjabi in USA" said.

[/quote]

Well brother, 1100 million were not supposed to vote for modi but they rejected his party that they were supposed to do as secular citizens. Incidently BJP, which U know is extremist party, was uprooted from power. Wont U give credit for this to Indian voters?

[quote]
You seem to be a good person and that's why you think there are no such people in India, unfortunately there are a lot of people like that in India (you will be shocked to know), i have watched documentaries on Indian tv, it was a hindu who took hidden camera to interview a HINDU leader and he revealed how they were planning attack against muslims, what weapons they were secretly building etc. I am at work so you can google it if you want or check youtube.
[/quote]

Natural exception is everywhere. U can see hindus doing all possible things which hinduism forbids. U can see enough muslims doing all unislamic and bad things, passing ur verdict about hindus on some exceptions will not do justice to anyone. I know that there are few hindus like what u suggest, but arnt there few muslims who think on same lines? What we have to watch out for that whether these kind of elements could ever gain support of majority of hindus? thats something which should be considered while passing ur verdict on hindus. And no one can deny this fact that no extremist party could form government in the centre. Indian voters always rejected the idea of allowing any religious extremist party to rule the nation, except for 5 years when BJP ruled with coilation watch. They could never dare undermine secular fabric of India. Gujrat being an exception, and I admit it shame facedly.

Peace.