Professor vs. student: Discussion on God

[Ghost14]

Re: Professor vs. student: Discussion on God

@psyah

Example of logical tools used to extract information from the Qur’an:

Verse 2:2: Sahih International
This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah -

Logically we deduce that

Qur’an is being equated with No doubt i.e. certainty …
It is also saying that it guides the class of people who are conscious of Allah …

Therefore by deduction we can say that The Qur’an alludes to saying there is no doubt that people who are conscious of Allah will be guided to Islam if they read it.

So this is a claim … We can ask … is it really true that people who are conscious of God are guided to Islam after reading the Qur’an … We can see that this claim is true, by finding three or more people … Because in Arabic it employs the plural … which is at least 3 …

Although for those who are not conscious of God must admit that it is certainly true that Believers are drawn to faith through this book.

So there is now information that we can test and information that is inaccessible.

How the Qur’an influences the believers who read it … Is testable …

The idea of Allah existing … We can do nothing with it logically neither confirm it nor negate it.

The idea of there being no doubt about the Quran is coming *from *the Quran. Do you not see the problem with that? If I write a book which states that everything I write in the book, and everything I say, is the absolute truth, does that make it so?

So basically, people who already believe in Allah, believe the Quran, therefore, God exists? The same can be said of Scientology. If an atheist reads both, and decides that neither is true, does that mean God doesn’t exist?