Post-election shuffle in US Administration [Merged]

Well, there are two different things going on there. Shuffle in the State department and other cabinet positions is expected and customary everytime a President is relected. Upto five secretaries being dropped is about the norm... and naturally under-secretaries and other assorted senior level staff will also be shuffled.

The other thing going on is the musical chairs in CIA. And that has more to do with Ross taking over, and not necessarily due to Bush's reelection. There are two versions of the story, ofcourse. One is that Ross is heavy-handed and has turned off a bunch of very experienced and senior CIA leadership and they are quitting in protest. The other story is that Ross is trying his damndest best to 'clean' the agency and make it more effective, after the spectacular failures of 9/11 and lack of WMD... and thus kicking out senior managers is the way to go.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ma Mooli: *
Well there goes probably the only decent/moderate guy in his cabinet. Good job for him. Their loss eh.
[/QUOTE]

Yup for an outsider, it will seem as their loss. Although, now Bush admin will have a unilateral agenda as the voice of moderation is gone, Often times, Powell was at odds with Cheney and Rummy.

Its funny how poeple that have never set their foot in combat are the biggest hawks in this administration :p

wasnt it him who called them as ****ing crazies ? Couldnt agree more. perhaps they thought its time to get thier own back.

Faisal,

Sure it is normal after an election when a new president is elected not a continuation of the old regime. I can't remember a cleaning of house this thorough with a re-elected president.

This is a president with nothing to lose.

Minha, Clinton had 7 new cabinet members brought in after his re-election.

Rice picked to be top US diplomat

*Rice picked to be top US diplomat *

[thumb=H]rice21124_8881494.JPG[/thumb]

US President George W Bush has announced that national security adviser Condoleezza Rice is his choice as the new secretary of state.
Ms Rice, 50, a close confidante of Mr Bush, is to succeed Colin Powell.

If confirmed in the post by the US Senate, she will be the first black female secretary of state.

Mr Bush said that during the last four years, he had appreciated the experience, counsel and "sound and steady judgement" of Ms Rice.

"The secretary of state is America's face to the world and in Dr Rice the world will see the strength, grace and decency of our country," Mr Bush said.

The president also announced that he would promote deputy national security adviser Stephen Hadley to succeed Ms Rice as national security adviser.

She said it was an honour to be asked again to serve her country. It was also " humbling" to succeed her mentor Colin Powell, whom she described as a "great and inspirational secretary of state."

Mr Bush also again paid tribute to Mr Powell, 67, who resigned on Monday. He said it had always been his intention to serve only one term.

His resignation was announced along with three other cabinet members, bringing to six the number of key figures to leave the 15-member cabinet.

*'Driven and highly ambitious' *

Ms Rice is a trusted member of President's Bush innermost circle - some describe her as almost family, the BBC's Jill McGivering in Washington says.

She is also said to share many of his views, and is described as driven and highly ambitious, our correspondent says.

Ms Rice is seen as a more abrasive character than UN ambassador John Danforth who was earlier also tipped as a possible successor to Mr Powell, analysts say.

The president's choice says much about how he intends to approach the world in his second term, which begins with his inauguration on 20 January.

Much of the foreign policy focus in the second term is likely to be firmly on the Middle East but Ms Rice's background as a Russian expert will prove useful at a time of concern about President Vladimir Putin's handling of political and civil rights.

The Bush administration seems keen to exert firm control over the state department and Ms Rice's appointment will certainly bring it strongly back into the fold, our correspondent says.

There was speculation that the only reason she might turn down the post was because she coveted the defence portfolio but that has not become vacant.

She is a yes-man ooops yes-lady. I hope she develops @alls to take a stand rather than play the piano in Camp David for little Georgi Pooh (Bush Jr).

Read the whole story here is the link
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/17/opinion/17kris.html

Here is an article from NY times on the latest re-shuffle. For the record I can’t stand William Safire but do read his articles to get a balanced view, and do read his articles with an open non-judgemental mind.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/17/opinion/17safi.html

WASHINGTON — Lord knows I have tried, over the years, to keep Colin Powell on the grammatical strait and narrow. And yet, announcing his resignation, the departing secretary of state said that after the president and he had “fulsome discussions on it, we came to mutual agreement. …”
Fulsome means “offensively excessive,” and when two people agree, it’s always mutual. This otherwise good man is incorrigible.
We have had more substantive run-ins. After I recalled his mistake in failing to overthrow Saddam when he had the chance in 1991, Powell retorted, “Safire is getting arrogant in his old age.” True enough, but he took me aside to apologize, and I came to admire some of his actions at State - especially the way he spun Pakistan’s prime minister around on a dime after 9/11, which helped us defeat the Taliban.
In that spirit, I apologize for having quoted colleagues of Colin’s deputy, Richard Armitage, as saying he was “better neckless than feckless.” Armitage is leaving, too, presumably to help Powell write his next best seller, “The Secret Thoughts of Bob Woodward.”
You didn’t think Bush had an exit strategy? Six loyal cabinet members have exited so far, accompanied by a flock of pouting spooks at Langley who bet on a Kerry victory. More are sure to join the cabinet appointees and bureaucrats in a mass exodus usually described as biblical.
I expected Powell to stick around a few months to see if Arafat’s death could give him a chance for shuttle diplomacy leading to a Nobel Prize. Wrong; he probably assumed, with reason, that the Palestinians are a long way from controlling Hamas, no matter whom they elect in January - and with no crackdown on violence, no serious negotiation is likely right away.
I also expected the Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz duo of idealistic hawks to stay firmly in place at the Pentagon well into the new term, backed up by Dick Cheney. Right; no exodus there.
What, then, will Condi Rice’s move from national security adviser to secretary of state mean for U.S. foreign policy in Bush’s second term?
The center of decision-making gravity will move slightly to the right, with the necessary hard fist in a softer glove. Powell’s inclination to settle was a counterweight to Rumsfeld’s drive to win. Though the two stayed personally compatible - remarkable near the center of power, where differences are usually personalized - their Weltanschauungs diverged.
Rice took pains to stay in the policy middle and on the operational fringe, the better to coolly advise the president. When she goes to State, will she adopt the Powell role as counterweight? Will she, as most Foggy Bottom secretaries do, “go native” - be absorbed by the accommodationist mind-set that is the hallmark of professional diplomacy?

.

I'm waiting for the scandal between Condolezza and George.

Not gona happen..but what if?

I don't trust Condolezza....It was her expertise saying aluminum rods in Iraq might be used to extract nuclear material.

And wasn't it her that excused use of such possibility that later was not to included toward reason for war?...

But it was....

And didn't she say.."They forgot to exclude it?" in some speach?

Anyone interested in a secretary of defense that is on record protecting staff with the conveinent excuse... They forgot? They neglected?

ummm.. IMHO...Job that large requires no one forget any advise or orders.

I don't trust her judgement.

What kind of Dr. is she? If right-wing wins........

Her malpractice insurance suddenly became a lot cheaper.