Re: PM speech at the UN
Dossiers of Indian hand in terrorism handed over to UN chief: Aziz - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
Re: PM speech at the UN
I was serious in my post and news of handing over dossiers came a day after my post.
and no i do not expect NS to go "oyeee modiaaaa" in un speech but could be more direct in pointing towards India in un speech that is more public than giving dossiers behind close doors.
anyway its still better than what he did in Russia.
It was a UN speech, not an address at jalsa rally. He did make a reference to schemes and plots to destabilise Pakistan which for some people probably just wasn't explicit enough in pointing towards India. But that could be a fair criticism.
In case you were serious with your post, Pakistan has presented evidence of Indian sponsored terrorism to Ban Ki Moon today. Time for some people to support their country's case on international forum, instead of indulging in cynical jeering and mocking of their cause.
Re: PM speech at the UN
What kind of dossiers that can't be shared in public or can't even be given air in a UN address? Is afghanistan more ghairat mand than Pakistan? REMEMBER, it is not just nawaz but military dictators like musharraf who also played that game, so who is to blame?
What a stupid joke!
- CUE the typical military apologists to make excuse as to why it couldn't be said in "public". AND THEN others would be blamed as raw, mossad, mqm, ppp jiyalas or nooras..
Re: PM speech at the UN
What kind of dossiers that can't be shared in public or can't even be given air in a UN address? Is afghanistan more ghairat mand than Pakistan? REMEMBER, it is not just nawaz but military dictators like musharraf who also played that game, so who is to blame?
What a stupid joke!
- CUE the typical military apologists to make excuse as to why it couldn't be said in "public". AND THEN others would be blamed as raw, mossad, mqm, ppp jiyalas or nooras..
Oh bhai chief of army staff is publicly denouncing India where ever he gets a chance, Nawaz sharif being a civilian has presented his case the way he thought fit.
Re: PM speech at the UN
Oh bhai chief of army staff is publicly denouncing India where ever he gets a chance, Nawaz sharif being a civilian has presented his case the way he thought fit.
Who cares about what ISPR says in Pakistan? You do know they call pakistanis to be filled with paranoid delusions.
My thing is that why can't pakistan say anything when even Afghanistan can cone out and say it at UN?
It could be :
There is some deeper pakistani connection to the terrorists that pakistan doesnt want to publicize for alienating certain sections
Pakistan is bay gahirat including establisment. After all, musharraf or raheel shareef etc don't gace regular hardahips of life with fauji foundation and plots.
ISI, MI is not what is portrayed and is totally inept giving indians, Afghans and gulfis among others full reign in pakistan.
TBH none if these scenarios are good. Even china would help you if pakistan took indian involvement to UN.
Seriously, i am done with this dossier bs fron pakistan. Last time with Holbrook, he denied it that pakistan gave him anything. Is everyone lying?
Let the army apologists begin.
Re: PM speech at the UN
Who cares about what ISPR says in Pakistan? You do know they call pakistanis to be filled with paranoid delusions.
My thing is that why can't pakistan say anything when even Afghanistan can cone out and say it at UN?
It could be :
There is some deeper pakistani connection to the terrorists that pakistan doesnt want to publicize for alienating certain sections
Pakistan is bay gahirat including establisment. After all, musharraf or raheel shareef etc don't gace regular hardahips of life with fauji foundation and plots.
ISI, MI is not what is portrayed and is totally inept giving indians, Afghans and gulfis among others full reign in pakistan.
TBH none if these scenarios are good. Even china would help you if pakistan took indian involvement to UN.
Seriously, i am done with this dossier bs fron pakistan. Last time with Holbrook, he denied it that pakistan gave him anything. Is everyone lying?
Let the army apologists begin.
The army might be bayghairat that's why they can't present their case anywhere. Anyways I am out of this thread.