Re: Please critique this replica!
Proto, thank you for the clarification. I apologize for my hasty and incomplete post. It was not my intention to be deceptive. Furthermore, thank you for responding promptly to all my concerns. I am nothing but pleased with your customer service and hope this experience will teach me how to communicate my ideas more effectively so that they don’t get ‘lost in translation.’ I hope to continue working with you well into the future, IA :). Also, any advice or suggestions are always welcome.
Everyone else, thanks for your opinions! I will respond to some of your comments and and take this offline. As proto mentioned: ‘this thread/discussion is not at all about confronting or arguing over the dress.’
Muzna, thank you for the lesson is precision! You’re right, I didn’t want a replica. I wanted straight kameez with long sleeves made with a near-replica of the shape and work on the neck and a daman that was created by borrowing motifs from the neck. I will attempt be more precise in the future.
I didn’t expect my kameez to be 100% the same, but honestly I expected it be similar enough that I would be able to recognize it as an attempt to replicate the original. mama ki dua and S and S, I had these expectations precisely because I had done my homework:



And so like many of you mentioned, I was expecting the neckline to be the same and also the type of kaam to be more beads and green stones and not zardosi. I was also expecting the color, shape, number and placement of the stones to be closer to the original.
I learned two important lessons here:
The value of good customer service. The most important thing here is that proto is willing to listen to my issues and work with me.
The importance of being precise and clarifying expectations for both parties. From your past experiences, If you have suggestions about the kind of details one should add in an order, I sure it will be helpful for me and others.