u really think he did more damaged to Pakistan thn Zia? ... after all these yrs .. we are still suffereing cuz of the harm ZIA did to Pakistan!
I dont think so ... nobody in Pakistans history has harmed Pakistan like Zia did! ... he was a US puppet and whn they didnt need him anymore .. he was eliminated from the game! he put his interests before the national interest! ...
anyhow ... there is no point in going back to the history! ... we should be discussing current threats Pakistan is facing!!
You don't think 'idhr hum udhr tum' didn't result in what happened (a disgrace) in 1971? Bhutto also single handedly nuked our economy with his dumb nationalization (socialist my arse when feudal holdings were never socialized) after the jolt to the economy due to loss of e. pakistan. Zia wasn't corrupt himself, but his reliance on jamat type clowns did put a nail in the sectarian harmony of Pakistan. I don't even want to talk about the dark decade of the nineties.
u really think he did more damaged to Pakistan thn Zia? ... after all these yrs .. we are still suffereing cuz of the harm ZIA did to Pakistan!
I dont think so ... nobody in Pakistans history has harmed Pakistan like Zia did! ... he was a US puppet and whn they didnt need him anymore .. he was eliminated from the game! he put his interests before the national interest! ...
anyhow ... there is no point in going back to the history! ... we should be discussing current threats Pakistan is facing!!
Discussing with him is like hitting your head on the wall. Don't waste your time on this loser.
Just because I don't worship people that you like? I expected nothing constructive out of a brain dead jiyala. Don't you have to go chant "bhutto bhutto bilawal bilawal aye aye" at some jalsa right now?
To change the minds of people he started proxy war in Kashmir in 1965 which turned out full war with India. The war was abruptly stopped after 17days, converting it to be a meaningless adventure by the corrupt and stupid dictator from where the down fall of Pakistan started.
Thank you for elucidating the facts. However, we in India, notice is that the adventure started in 1965 has turned out to be the main integrants of Pakistan’s nation policy. Pak cried bogy of human right violation of Kashmiri Muslims by Indian gov., forgetting that more Muslims live in India than Pakistan.
Pak has tried to make it an international issue to avenge its division of Bangladesh. Your successive governments (civil or military) supported all the secession movements in India: Kashmir, Khalistan, Greater Assam, Bodoland, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and so on. However, just to claim that peace in South Asia cannot be achieved without resolving Kashmir issue is overhyped. The Pakistan version of ‘resolving the issue’ is against the status quo and it wants India should give up Kashmir to Pakistan. Kashmir is the epitome example of secularism in India and also a proof that Hindus and Muslim can live together (against the two nation theory) as they hv been living since centuries.
I realized from various posts in this group that the people in Pakistan want friendly and cordial relationship with India and same is with us. We even realize that a peaceful Pakistan is essential for development of India and SAARC region. However peace is a two-sided concept. India, being a bigger nation has more responsibility in bringing peace here.
it was a general comment not for pakistanis only , no problem with you!
it is bad if we degrade our national leaders , are not we making fun of ourselves ?
why not ram prasad khanna is general of balochistan liberation army ,
dinesh kumar dhillo is area commander
pappu sing baloch is proposed king of balochistan kingdom
which nagaland you are being accused of exporting terrorists ? oh loss of memory , you must be talking about nagaland with capital of srinagar remember? must you !
