Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Still no denial of the fact that you are a paid propagandist. Trying to change the subject again. Loser…get a real job rather than creating nicks on 100’s of website and putting a spin on, everytime someone writes something negative about the US or Israel.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Arshad5 being told that there ZERO proof of CIA supporting TTP = 
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
I am going to help your employers get their moneys worth in this thread out of you boy.
[INDENT]U.S. cyber-diplomacy is led by the United States Department of State and is a new tool in fulfilling the U.S. public diplomacy mission. As stated by Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, the mission of American public diplomacy “is to support the achievement of U.S. foreign policy goals and objectives, advance national interests, and enhance national security by informing and influencing foreign publics.
U.S cyber diplomacy is a new name for propaganda over the internet. Now why do you need cyber propagandist on forums when the message is good and you have your heart in the right place? Or is it an attempt to fool people because what you are doing is wrong and upsetting people?
[/INDENT]
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
ISAF aggression against Pakistan
The Pakistani troops operating in Salala area, on the night 25/26 Nov, had trapped the Tehrik-e-Taliban-e-Pakistan (TPP) militants, about fifty strong, belonging to Waliur Rahman/Fazalullah group, engaged in anti-Pakistan activities. The militants gave the SOS to ISAF and NATO and American air crafts and gunships rushed, to rescue the trapped militants. The two Pakistani posts, came under intense fire. The Pakistani officer commanding the posts, immediately contacted the ISAF and warned them that, it were the Pakistani posts, under attack, and fire must stop, but the message was ignored and the attack continued for over two hours, till the militants were rescued to the safety of Afghan territory. This brutal act of the ISAF was not the only incident, because earlier on our border posts had been attacked by the militants, supported by ISAF, killing many of our troops. This was the third time that ISAF violated Pakistan’s territory.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Key TTP leader killed in US drone strike - thenews.com.pk
Key TTP leader killed in US drone strike
MIRANSHAH: Commander Wali Muhammad aka Tufan Mehsud, a key Pakistani Taliban figure, has reportedly been killed in a US drone strike which also killed 11 other people, sources said on Sunday.
According to reports, the militant commander was a close relative of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan chief Hakimullah Mehsud and succeeded another commander Qari Hussian following his killing.
AFP adds: US drones fired a volley of missiles at militant hideouts in northwest Pakistan on Sunday, killing at least 12 Taliban fighters near the Afghan border, security officials said.
The missile attack took place in Babar Ghar village in South Waziristan, a tribal district bordering Afghanistan which is a stronghold of Taliban and Al-Qaeda-linked militants.
“US drones fired several missiles at two militant compounds. At least 12 militants have been killed and several others were wounded,” a security official in Miranshah told AFP under condition of anonymity.
The official earlier said eight militants were killed. “There are members of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) among those who have been killed,” he said, adding that a close relative of TTP chief Hakimullah Mehsud was among the dead.
“Most of the militants were from Punjabi Taliban group and a close relative of Hakimullah Mehsud,” the official said.
Another security official in the northwestern city of Peshawar confirmed the drone attacks and casualties.
Intelligence officials in Miranshah said that militants had died after US drones fired up to 10 missiles on three militant compounds in the Babar Ghar attack, but the security officials could not verify that account.
Residents said that militants had cordoned off the area and were looking for more dead or wounded in the debris.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Exclusive: Emerging Pakistan Taliban chief to focus on Afghan war | Reuters
Exclusive: Emerging Pakistan Taliban chief to focus on Afghan war
By Mehreen Zahra-Malik
WANA, Pakistan | Thu Dec 6, 2012 11:49am EST
(Reuters) - Pakistan’s Taliban, one of the world’s most feared militant groups, are preparing for a leadership change that could mean less violence against the state but more attacks against U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, Pakistani military sources said.
Hakimullah Mehsud, a ruthless commander who has led the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) for the last three years, has lost operational control of the movement and the trust of his fighters, said a senior Pakistan army official based in the South Waziristan tribal region, the group’s stronghold.
The organization’s more moderate deputy leader, Wali-ur-Rehman, 40, is poised to succeed Mehsud, whose extreme violence has alienated enough of his fighters to significantly weaken him, the military sources told Reuters.
“Rehman is fast emerging as a consensus candidate to formally replace Hakimullah,” said the army official, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. “Now we may see the brutal commander replaced by a more pragmatic one for whom reconciliation with the Pakistani government has become a priority.”
Pakistani military officials in Rawalpindi, headquarters of the army, declined comment on the Taliban leadership struggle and said they had no official position on the issue.
The TTP, known as the Pakistan Taliban, was set up as an umbrella group of militants in 2007.
Its main aim is to topple the U.S.-backed government in Pakistan and impose its austere brand of Islam across the country of 185 million people, although it has also carried out attacks in neighboring Afghanistan.
The militants intensified their battle against the Pakistani state after an army raid on Islamabad’s Red Mosque in 2007, which had been seized by allies of the group.
Mehsud, believed to be in his mid-30s, took over the Pakistan Taliban in August 2009. He rose to prominence in 2010 when U.S. prosecutors charged him with involvement in an attack that killed seven CIA employees at a U.S. base in Afghanistan. His profile was raised further when he appeared in a farewell video with the Jordanian suicide bomber who killed the employees.
Reuters interviewed several senior Pakistan military officials as well as tribal elders and locals during a three-day trip with the army in South Waziristan last week, getting rare access to an area that has been a virtual no-go zone for journalists since an army offensive was launched in October 2009.
Three senior military officials said informers in the Pakistan Taliban told them Mehsud was no longer steering the group.
Pakistan Taliban commanders did not respond to repeated requests for comment on the possible leadership change.
U.S. officials said that while Rehman was Mehsud’s natural successor, they cautioned about expecting an imminent transition. Mehsud’s standing in the Pakistan Taliban might have weakened, but he still had followers, they said.
Washington has offered a reward of $5 million for information leading to the capture of either Mehsud or Rehman.
One Pakistan military official, who has served in South Waziristan for more than two years, said his Pakistan Taliban contacts first alerted him to Mehsud’s waning power six months ago, when constant pressure from the Pakistan military, U.S. drone strikes and poor health had hurt his ability to lead.
“Representing the moderate point of view, there is a probability that under Rehman, TTP will dial down its fight against the Pakistani state, unlike Hakimullah who believes in wanton destruction here,” said the military official based in the South Waziristani capital of Wana.
The official said this might lead to more attacks across the border in Afghanistan because Rehman has been pushing for the group’s fighters to turn their guns on Western forces.
Other factions within the Pakistan Taliban such as the Nazir group in South Waziristan and the Hekmat Gul Bahadur faction in North Waziristan have struck peace deals with the Pakistani military while focusing attacks on Western and Afghan forces in Afghanistan.
A change in the Pakistan Taliban’s focus would complicate Western efforts to stabilize Afghanistan before most NATO troops leave by the end of 2014, said Riaz Mohammad Khan, a Pakistani diplomat who has held several posts dealing with Afghanistan.
The United States is already fighting the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network, which is based along the unruly frontier between Afghanistan and Pakistan and which is perhaps Washington’s deadliest foe in Afghanistan.
The last thing U.S.-led NATO troops need is a new, formidable enemy in the approach to 2014.
Such a shift in emphasis, however, could reduce the number of suicide bombings that have plagued Pakistan in recent years, scaring off investment needed to prop up an economy that has barely managed to grow since 2007.
AT EACH OTHER’S THROATS
The Pakistan Taliban, who are close to al Qaeda, remain resilient despite a series of military offensives. They took part in a number of high-profile operations, including an attack on army headquarters in 2009, assaults on military bases, and the attempted assassination of Pakistani schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai in October, who had campaigned for girls’ education.
The Pakistan Taliban were also blamed for the 2008 bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad which killed more than 50 people.
Under Mehsud, the organization formed complex alliances with other militant groups spread across Pakistan.
But it has long been strained by internal rivalries over strategy. Mehsud has pushed the war with the Pakistani state, while others such as Rehman want the battle to be against U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan.
“Rehman has even held secret negotiations with the Pakistani government in the past but Hakimullah always stood in his way, wanting to carry on fighting the Pakistani military,” a second Wana-based military official said.
The two were at each other’s throats earlier this year and hostilities were close to open warfare, Taliban sources said.
“Differences within the ranks have only gotten worse, not better, rendering the TTP a much weaker force today than a few years ago,” the second military official said.
A source close to the Taliban told Reuters there had been months of internal talks on the Pakistan Taliban’s decreasing support among locals and fighters in tribal areas where the group has assassinated many pro-government elders.
“The Taliban know they are fighting a public relations war, and under someone like Hakimullah, they will only lose it,” added the source, who declined to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
It isn’t clear whether Mehsud will hand over the leadership to Rehman without a fight.
A power struggle could split the group, making it more difficult to recruit young fighters and also disrupt the safe havens in Pakistan used by Afghan militants.
According to accepted practice, a leadership council, or shura, will ultimately decide whether to formally replace Mehsud with Rehman.
Intelligence officials said Mehsud had not commanded any recent operations, including an August 16 attack on the Minhas Airbase in Pakistan and a suicide attack on a street market in May that killed 24 people.
Military sources said Rehman planned the April 15 jail break in Bannu in Pakistan that freed 384 prisoners, including an estimated 200 Taliban members and an al Qaeda-linked militant who had attempted to assassinate former president Pervez Musharraf.
FALL FROM GRACE
Intelligence officials in the area said Mehsud’s brutality had turned his own subordinates against him, while the more measured Rehman had emerged as the group’s primary military strategist.
“If a leader doesn’t behave like a leader, he loses support. For the longest time now, Hakimullah has done the dirty work while Wali-ur-Rehman is the thinker. Taliban fighters recognize this,” said the first Pakistani military source.
A local elder described Mehsud as “short-tempered and trigger-happy”.
“(Mehsud) used to work 24 hours a day, tirelessly. But he would also put a gun to anyone’s head and kill them for his cause,” said a local shopkeeper who has family members involved in the Pakistan Taliban.
Mehsud gained his reputation fighting with the Afghan Taliban against U.S. and allied forces in Helmand province in Afghanistan. He was later given command of Taliban factions in the Bajaur, Orakzai, Khyber and Kurram regions.
He took over the Pakistan Taliban after a weeks-long succession battle with Rehman following the death of Baitullah Mehsud in a drone strike. The two Mehsuds were not related.
(Additional reporting by Jibran Ahmad in Peshawar; Editing by Randy Fabi, Michael Georgy and Dean Yates)
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Commentary: How Drones Changed the Game in Pakistan | The National Interest
How Drones Changed the Game in Pakistan
Regardless of what the news agencies in Pakistan claim about the negative effects of drone strikes, the weapon is proving to be a game changer for the U.S. war on terrorism. And surprisingly, the Pakistani Army quietly admits to this fact. Just the way Stinger missiles shifted the balance of power in favor of the United States in the 1980s, drones are producing the same results. The critics of unmanned strikes, who claim that drones are contributing to growing radicalization in Pakistan, haven’t looked around enough—or they would realize that much of the radicalization already was established by the Taliban in the 1990s. The real tragedy is that it is acceptable for the Taliban to radicalize and kill, but it is considered a breach of sovereignty for the United States, in pursuit of those radicalizing Pakistan’s people, to do the same.
There is so much protest over the drones because the media reports about them are biased. Although people on ground in war zones contend that the drone strikes have very few civilian casualties and, with time, have become extremely precise, the media presents quite a different story to boost its ratings.
Many in Pakistan, especially in the army, understand the positive impact of this weapon. Drones are coming in handy for two reasons: their precision and psychological effect. Many analysts of this subject have been concerned only with the military aspect, such as whether or not drones are precise enough and the casualties they incur. But part of what works in favor of the United States is the psychological impact—the fear that drones have instilled in the militants. The fact that the United States might strike day or night, inside the militant compound or outside while traveling in the convoys, works to deter militants and restrict their operations. This tilts the balance of power in favor of the United States.
Most of the people in the Pakistani Army whom I interviewed on the subject were positive about the drone strikes and their direct correlation with a decrease in terrorist attacks in Pakistan. The majority focused on the psychological impact of the drones and how they have put militants on the run, forcing them to sleep under trees at night, though it must be said that army officials showed some concern about cases in which the same psychological impact is experienced by civilians.
Locals I talked to are frustrated over the fear that they might get hit by a drone if the militants are hiding in their neighborhood. But this frustration may have a positive impact as it motivates civilians to flush out and close doors to militants who seek refuge in their areas.
Surprisingly, there isn’t as much anti-Americanism as one would suspect in areas where the United States is conducting drone strikes, largely because the locals are fed up with the influx of militants in their areas and have suffered because of terrorism. However, urban centers, which have suffered the least from terrorism, are far more radicalized and anti-American. Hence, we see large anti-drone rallies in the cities of Punjab, where people have little first-hand experience with drones. The anti-American lot in these places will start a rally for any reason at all as long as they get to burn a few American flags.
Pakistan’s army remains worried about the domestic political repercussions of drone strikes. The army has been weakened already by its rift with the civilian government, and increasing pressure from the United States likely will continue that trend. With a low approval rating, the army is nervous about dealing with the growing sentiment against drone strikes, no matter how effective they have been recently. The Pakistan People’s Party also is worried, having taken blows from the judiciary and the opposition. Recent media reports claiming a secret, backdoor deal between the Pakistan People’s Party government and the United States over the drone strikes have further delegitimized the party.
These concerns about the civilian impact of drones are genuine, and the United States will have to address them. Drone operators must become more precise and accurate in their targeting and intelligence gathering. This can be done only through unconditional cooperation with Pakistan, which requires being sensitive to that country’s domestic political conditions.
Pakistan and the United States also need to be careful about drone strikes possibly pushing militants deeper into Pakistani cities. Drones will be useless if security forces are unable to stop a migration of militants into urban centers. Likewise, the United States will have serious challenges gaining permission for drone strikes outside tribal areas without improvements in diplomatic relations.
While drones are successful today, the United States must remember that it will be only a matter of time before militants find a way to hide from unmanned attacks. As such, drone operations ultimately must be accompanied by a political solution. The United States finds itself in a stronger bargaining position due to the use of drones, and it must make good use of this opportunity.
Hussain Nadim is a visiting scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Terrorism in Pakistan started with the occupation of Afghanistan and will end when occupation ends. Drones strikes will not make any difference. This is a fact.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Looky what i found. Oh the joys of the intraweb:
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/580602_446153765439440_1826669652_n.jpg
Read the last Para of this secret memo sent in 2010. US gave weapons and money to their agent in Landi Kotal.
75 AK47 rifles, 20 RPG’s, 50 pistols, 340 boxes of different ammo and 1600000 US dollars paid to US agent Rahmaan
Khan s/o Ali Khan, resident of Landi Kotal… paid by 2nd Batallion of US Special Forces!!
Yes these weapons were given so that they could spy.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
The United States Army Special Forces, also known as the Green Berets because of their distinctive service headgear, are a special operations force tasked with five primary missions: unconventional warfare (the original and most important mission of Special Forces), foreign internal defense, special reconnaissance, direct action, and counter-terrorism. The first two emphasize language, cultural, and training skills in working with foreign troops.
Currently, Special Forces units are deployed in Operation Enduring Freedom. As a special operations unit, Special Forces are not necessarily under the command authority of the ground commanders in those countries. Instead, while in theater, SF soldiers may report directly to United States Central Command, USSOCOM, or other command authorities. The Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) highly secretive Special Activities Division (SAD) and more specifically its elite Special Operations Group (SOG) recruits from the Army’s Special Forces. Joint CIA-Army Special Forces operations go back to the famed MACV-SOG during the Vietnam War. This cooperation still exists today and is seen in the War in Afghanistan.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
The main mission of the Special Forces was to train and lead unconventional warfare (UW) forces, or a guerrilla force in an occupied nation that no one is allowed to know.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
I was just about to post this to make Arshad5 happy.
It is a total fake and has been proved so but Arshad5 is so desperate so anything to make him happy. 
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
I don’t know about the above but I am looking forward to your proof that it is fake. But the below is not fake.
The United States Army Special Forces**,** also known as the Green Berets because of their distinctive service headgear, are a special operations force tasked with five primary missions: unconventional warfare (the original and most important mission of Special Forces), foreign internal defense, special reconnaissance, direct action, and counter-terrorism. The first two emphasize language, cultural, and training skills in working with foreign troops.
Currently, Special Forces units are deployed in Operation Enduring Freedom. As a special operations unit, Special Forces are not necessarily under the command authority of the ground commanders in those countries. Instead, while in theater, SF soldiers may report directly to United States Central Command, USSOCOM, or other command authorities. The Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) highly secretive Special Activities Division (SAD) and more specifically its elite Special Operations Group (SOG) recruits from the Army’s Special Forces. Joint CIA-Army Special Forces operations go back to the famed MACV-SOG during the Vietnam War. This cooperation still exists today and is seen in the War in Afghanistan.[INDENT]**
The main mission of the Special Forces was to train and lead unconventional warfare (UW) forces, or a guerrilla force in an occupied nation that no one is allowed to know. **
Unconvential warfare means guerilla warfare, militancy and terrorism.[/INDENT]
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Its fake because the guy who made it already admitted to it.
Please check the various defence forums for that. 
And for the rest of your paragraph, you are describing the organization of the US Special Forces. How from there you are getting solid proof of US supporting TTP is beyond me.
But I guess when you are that desperate to prove your pathetic nonsensical conspiracy theories as true, you are desperate to cling on to anything.
Truly quite sad.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Its fake because the guy who made it already admitted to it. :D
Please check the various defence forums for that. :)
And for the rest of your paragraph, you are describing the organization of the US Special Forces. How from there you are getting solid proof of US supporting TTP is beyond me.
But I guess when you are that desperate to prove your pathetic nonsensical conspiracy theories as true, you are desperate to cling on to anything.
Truly quite sad.
Who made it? and why did he admit it is fake? you have any links? I don't have 100's of nicks on various sites so I don't know the details of this document.
Can Special Forces not be involved in state terrorism like you are using drones to kill more innocents in strikes than actual terrorists. Do Special Forces not take part in assassinations? What is unconventional warfare?
Conspiracy Nut...is someone that is a realist. Conspiracy Nut is someone that questions government spin, lies and disinformation. Don't tell me that governments don't lie as we all should know they do. WMD is a prime example of government lies, spins and disinformation.
When you cannot attack someone for their logic, or based on the facts then you resort to character assassination to fool the stupid amongst us.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
You are a proven liar. You can lie as much as you want here but eventually the truth will come out. Your lies are not doing anyone any favours in the long run.
**
Same Cover, Same Lies**
by ROBERT ANDERSON
The story of Raymond Allen Davis is one familiar to me and I wish our government would quit doing these things – they cost us credibility.
Davis is the American being held as a spy working under diplomatic cover out of our embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. You can understand why foreign countries no longer trust us and people are rising up across the Middle East against the Great Satan.
In the Vietnam War the country of Laos held a geo-strategic position, as does Pakistan does to Afghanistan today. As in Pakistan, in Laos our country conducted covert military operations against a sovereign people, using the CIA.
I was a demolitions technician with the Air Force who was reassigned to work with the CIA’s Air America operation in Laos. We turned in our military IDs cards and uniforms and were issued a State Department ID card and dressed in blue jeans. We were told if captured we were to ask for diplomatic immunity, if alive. We carried out military missions on a daily basis all across the countries of Laos, Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam.
We also knew that if killed or captured that we would probably not be searched for and our families back home in the U.S. would be told we had been killed in an auto accident of some kind back in Thailand and our bodies not recovered.
Our team knew when the UN inspectors and international media were scheduled to arrive – we controlled the airfields. We would disappear to our safe houses so we could not be asked questions. It was all a very well planned operation, 60 years ago, involving the military and diplomats out of the US Embassy. It had been going on a long time when I was there during the 1968 Tet Offensive. This continued for a long time, until we were routed and had to abandon the whole war as a failure.
In Laos the program I was attached to carried out a systematic assassination of people who were identified as not loyal to U.S. goals. It was called the Phoenix program and eliminated an estimated 60,000 people across Indochina. We did an amazing amount of damage to the civilian infrastructure of the country, and still lost the war. I saw one team of mercenaries I was training show us a bag of ears of dead civilians they had killed. This was how they verified their kills for us. The Green Berets that day were telling them to just take photos of the dead, leave the ears.
Mel Gibson made a movie about all this, called Air America. It included in the background the illegal drug operation the CIA ran to pay for their operations. Congress had not authorized funds for what we were doing. I saw the drug operation first hand too. This was all detailed in The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia by Alfred McCoy. I did not connect all this until the Iran-Contra hearings when Oliver North was testifying about it. Oliver North was a leader of the Laos operation I was assigned to work with.
Our country has a long history of these type programs going back to World War Two. We copied this from of warfare from the Nazis in WWII it seems. We justified it as necessary for the Cold War. One of the first operations was T.P. Ajax run by Kermit Roosevelt to overthrow the democratically elected government of Iran in 1953to take over their oil fields.
In that coup the CIA and the State Department under the Dulles Brothers first perfected these covert, illegal and immoral actions. Historians have suggested that Operation T.P. Ajax was the single event that set in motion the political force of Islamic fundamentalism we are still dealing with today.
Chalmers Johnson also a former CIA employee wrote a series of books too on these blowbacks that happen when the truth is held from the American public.
If we had taken a different approach to our problems in those days an approach that did not rely on lying to our own and the people of other countries and killing them indiscriminately our country would not be in the disaster it is abroad today..
I was young and foolish in those days of the Vietnam War, coveting my Top Secret security clearance, a big thing for an uneducated hillbilly from Appalachia. We saw ourselves much like James Bond characters, but now I am much wiser. These kinds of actions have immense and long reaching consequences and should be shut down.
But I see from the Ray Davis fiasco in Pakistan that our government is still up to its old way of denying to the people of the world what everyone knows is true.
When will this official hypocrisy end, when will our political
class speak out about this and quit going along with the lies and tricks? How many more of our people and others will die in these foolish programs?
Davis is in a bad situation now because most of the people of the world, as we see across the Middle East, are now aware of the lies and not going to turn their head anymore.
I say “most” everyone knows, because our own public, the ones suppose to be in control of the military and CIA, is constantly lied to. It is so sad to see President Obama repeating the big lie.
ROBERT ANDERSON lives in Albuquerque, N.M. He can be reached at [[email protected]](file:///x-msg/::529:[email protected])
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
Who made it? and why did he admit it is fake? you have any links? I don't have 100's of nicks on various sites so I don't know the details of this document.
Can Special Forces not be involved in state terrorism like you are using drones to kill more innocents in strikes than actual terrorists. Do Special Forces not take part in assassinations? What is unconventional warfare?
Conspiracy Nut...is someone that is a realist. Conspiracy Nut is someone that questions government spin, lies and disinformation. Don't tell me that governments don't lie as we all should know they do. WMD is a prime example of government lies, spins and disinformation.
When you cannot attack someone for their logic, or based on the facts then you resort to character assassination to fool the stupid amongst us.
People can do this and people can do that.
If that is your argument then you are beyond hope.
Its all about proving something and having factual and empirical evidence.
You have none. In over 7 years of TTP's existence, not a single iota of evidence has been found linking them to foreign agencies.
What USA did in Nicaragua, or wherever is totally irrelevant.
Its about TTP and their supposed foreign backers. There is no evidence for that and thus anything you say is total nonsense.
You are just too bitter and too brainwashed to expect fact and reality and thus rely on a daily doze of conspiracy nonsense to keep functioning.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
You guys are both completely off… The Taliban are a product of a mass UFO cover up! Aliens are actually controlling both the Taliban and the Americans and FATA is there base!
UFOS,Aliens in Pakistan…
Read it and be enlightened!
Even more evidence:
UFO IN COBRA FIRES ROCKETS AND GUNS AT TALIBAN? - YouTube
:salute:
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
People can do this and people can do that.
**Who made it? and why did he admit it is fake? you have any links? I don't have 100's of nicks on various sites so I don't know the details of this document.
You are dodging the question as you obviously lied that the person who made it admitted it was fake. Another lie exposed. ** If that is your argument then you are beyond hope. ** What argument and why beyond hope? Show me some evidence that disproves my argument. ** Its all about proving something and having factual and empirical evidence.
*Yes so show me the facts and empirical evidence. * You have none. In over 7 years of TTP's existence, not a single iota of evidence has been found linking them to foreign agencies.
*There is plenty of evidence if you look in this thread you will find some of it, but you don't want to find it as you are a paid progandist and you have to spin, lie and misinform. You have to distort facts and make the truth a lie and a lie a truth. Only a compulsive liar can do this sort of job. * What USA did in Nicaragua, or wherever is totally irrelevant.
**Why is it irrelevant? Why is what happened in Nicaragua and Laos irrelevant? It is very relevant as it shows us the history of America and how low it will stoop. If it can commit crimes and terrorism in Nicaragua and Laos which has been proven by history then why is it so hard to accept that it could be doing the same in Pakistan. By saying that it is irrelevant, you are not denying that these crimes and acts of terrorism did happen and were orchestrated by the US.
**Its about TTP and their supposed foreign backers. There is no evidence for that and thus anything you say is total nonsense.
**Prove me wrong. I want to be proven wrong. Present to me your facts and empirical evidence. I would rather not believe that the most allied of allies of the US is being backstabbed yet once again.
**You are just too bitter and too brainwashed to expect fact and reality and thus rely on a daily doze of conspiracy nonsense to keep functioning.
**Just because I don't believe in your lies, your spin and your attempts at disinformation ,I become bitter, brainwashed, and a conspiracy nut. So if I don't accept what tou say then there is something wrong with me. You must always be believed. But have you ever thought even for a second that I may be right? No you have not because you don't think you turn the truth into lies and lies into the truth.
**
.
Re: Pakistani Taleban: Run by foreign agencies
You cannot have a UFO in Cobra.
And the other website is made by some nutcase.