TTP spokesman phoning newspapers and claiming responsibility for terrorism and yet CIA drones that have killed 3,500 people cannot kill TTP terrorists. US satellities cannot listen to his phone conversations and locate him.
TTP terrorists are being killed left, right and center by Drones.
It takes time to triangulate a location and thats also if the number is known. Since the TTP spokesman makes calls from anonymous pay phones, this is next to impossible to do.
But I wonder, you are using this absurd logic to blame CIA for TTP, then I can also make the claim using your ridiculous conspiracy nonsense that ISI is behind the TTP because the TTP leader is making these calls and ISI cannot tap those phones and locate him?
Thats all the proof I need to believe that ISI is behind the TTP.
See, thats how absurd you sound.
First you tried, tattoos, uncircumcised penises and now this.
Nicaragua attributes to the direct action of United States personnel, or persons in its pay, operations against oil installations, a naval base, etc., *listed in paragraph 81 of the Judgment.*
The Court finds all these incidents, except three, to be established. Although it is not proved that any United States military personnel took a direct part in the operations, **United States agents participated in the planning, direction and support. The imputability to the United States of these attacks appears therefore to the Court to be established.
They could locate OBL who was totally isolated from the world, but the CIA cannot locate Ehsan who phones newspapers everyday to claim responsibility for attacks.
I am glad that you were entertained. You don' need any more theories otherwise your mind may be overwhelmed. I bet you haven't even understood this theory. Now how did I know that? Care to explain the theory back to me?
The theory is you are bonkers. The reason Pakistan has so many problems is because of people like you, who stick their head in the sand and blame the boogie monster for all their woes.
Why would the CIS support the Taleban, it makes no sense, you keep posting how they have done it before. However the circumstances were different, the Pakistani government is in the pocket of the Americans so why would they get paramilitaries to attack them and destabilise a country. I can understand them funding paramilitaries against governments who don't do what they want but why Pakistan?
They could locate OBL who was totally isolated from the world, but the CIA cannot locate Ehsan
The obvious answer is that CIA only goes after people it is interested in. They don't care about enemies of other countries if they are no threat to America.
This is why American drones usually target Taliban members active in Afghanistan since this is where Americans are killed; and hardly ever attack Taliban members active in Pakistan since Americans do not care about eliminating Pakistan's enemies. Americans would especially not attack Pakistan-focused Taliban because Pakistanis in general despise drone attacks.
American interest comes first in the eyes of Americans. It is neither Afghanistan nor Pakistan that they are interested in. Now that America wants to leave Afghanistan, it is willing to engage even Taliban in talks provided that they agree to abandon attacks against American interests. In other words, America would not say anything no matter how pathetic barbarian government Taliban come up with, if American interests are guaranteed.
And this won't be the first time. America's best friend in Middle East (second best friend, actually) is a medieval society with similarly repressive laws and archaic system of governance ... Saudi.
People in northern areas of Pakistan and Azad Kashmir are fair skinned. You are only showing your ignorance each time you show up in this thread.
If you maintain that the definition of 'white people' is fair skinned and all fair skinned people are therefore white, then my ignorance is obviously lot more intelligent than your knowledge!
You realize your theory would make as much as a 1/3 of African Americans in the US are white and about a quarter of Indians white?
or are you trying to say caucasians and mistakenly using the term 'white'?
Creating militant groups is nothing new for these "hicks". From Nicaragua, to Libya to present day Syria they have created these groups. What makes it so hard to believe that they have done the same in FATA? Is it that they are incapable of it or that you just want to blame Pakistan for everything under the sun?
USA created terror groups in Libya and Syria?
Arshad - please! can you please ration your gems to under 3 a day? but don't stop posting. It is very entertaining
They could locate OBL who was totally isolated from the world, but the CIA cannot locate Ehsan who phones newspapers everyday to claim responsibility for attacks.
OBL was found due to the Courier which the CIA tracked.
As for Ehsan, every other day the TTP people will be killed. I am sure he will die soon. But why leave it to the Americans? Why can't the Pakistani Army find him?
The theory is you are bonkers. The reason Pakistan has so many problems is because of people like you, who stick their head in the sand and blame the boogie monster for all their woes.
Why would the CIS support the Taleban, it makes no sense, you keep posting how they have done it before. However the circumstances were different, the Pakistani government is in the pocket of the Americans so why would they get paramilitaries to attack them and destabilise a country. I can understand them funding paramilitaries against governments who don't do what they want but why Pakistan?
I ask you to repeat the theory to me, and you can't even do that. I don't have time to waste on people who are stupid.
The obvious answer is that CIA only goes after people it is interested in. They don't care about enemies of other countries if they are no threat to America.
This is why American drones usually target Taliban members active in Afghanistan since this is where Americans are killed; and hardly ever attack Taliban members active in Pakistan since Americans do not care about eliminating Pakistan's enemies. Americans would especially not attack Pakistan-focused Taliban because Pakistanis in general despise drone attacks.
American interest comes first in the eyes of Americans. It is neither Afghanistan nor Pakistan that they are interested in. Now that America wants to leave Afghanistan, it is willing to engage even Taliban in talks provided that they agree to abandon attacks against American interests. In other words, America would not say anything no matter how pathetic barbarian government Taliban come up with, if American interests are guaranteed.
And this won't be the first time. America's best friend in Middle East (second best friend, actually) is a medieval society with similarly repressive laws and archaic system of governance ... Saudi.
The US is fighting a War On Terror and it isn't interest in going after terrorists. I don't have time to waste on stupid people.
If you maintain that the definition of 'white people' is fair skinned and all fair skinned people are therefore white, then my ignorance is obviously lot more intelligent than your knowledge!
You realize your theory would make as much as a 1/3 of African Americans in the US are white and about a quarter of Indians white?
or are you trying to say caucasians and mistakenly using the term 'white'?
I think that you asked me how a caucasian would blend in with TTP. I think that I answered that he doesn't have to caucasian, to be a cia terrorist. But even he was caucasian that grew a beard and wore a turban he could blend in as the local people are all white....then you asked me what white mean't then I told you it mean't fair skinned.
Now only an idiot would ask come back with stupid questions after that. So everytime you open your mouth you only show your stupidity.
Arshad - please! can you please ration your gems to under 3 a day? but don't stop posting. It is very entertaining
You don't know that the US is currently supporting militants in Syria? and you don't know that US sponsored militants in Libya to overthrow Gaddafi? I speak the truth when I say that everytime you write something here you only show your own stupidity.
There is at least one person here who is a loser and a paid propagandist. He goes around creating nicks on various websites and tries to put a spin on everything in the favour of US. This seems to be his full time job....browsing websites each day and everywhere he can find something negative about the US or Israel he tries to put a spin on it. I have personally proven him to be a liar on this thread. A disgrace to the human race. A vermin.
There is at least one person here who is a loser and a paid propagandist. He goes around creating nicks on various websites and tries to put a spin on everything and blames everyone else for Pakistan's problems. This seems to be his full time job....browsing websites each day and everywhere he can find something negative about Pakistan he tries to put a spin on it. I have personally proven him to be a total fraud, a con man, a person with zero intellect or intelligence. A disgrace to the human race. A vermin.
U.S. cyber-diplomacy is led by the United States Department of State and is a new tool in fulfilling the U.S. public diplomacy mission. As stated by Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, the mission of American public diplomacy “is to support the achievement of U.S. foreign policy goals and objectives, advance national interests, and enhance national security by informing and influencing foreign publics.
I don't post on any other site. All my posts are here, and I don't get paid, I have a full time occupation unlike you loser. I have caught you lying once again.
You have not denied my allegations against you. You are a paid propagandist. You go around creating nicks on various websites and try to put a spin on everything in the favour of US. This seems to be your full time job…browsing websites each day and everywhere you can find something negative about the US or Israel you try to put a spin on it. It is something that you have been doing for many years now.
I have personally proven you to be a liar on this thread.
I have given you evidence both direct and indirect that points to US support for TTP, you have still failed to prove your assertion that US does not support TTP, yet you still keep lying and trying to put a spin on it.
