Bharati Muslims are in precarious condition. They know that they have to sacrifice their religion if they want to get a certificate of being a true Bharati. Otherwise they will always be called ‘ghaddar’.
For example, a good Bharati Muslim is the one who endorses marriage between a Hindu and a Muslim, even though such a marriage is annulled according to Islam.
Such expectations are another form of the movements like ‘Shuddhi’ which were started before the birth of Pakistan.
Secularism in Bharat means acceptance of the dominance of Hindu culture and tradition. Even the name ‘Bharat’ is based on Hindu religious books.
what right indian muslims have in pakistan ? it is not thier homeland nothing to do with punjabi muslims. bengali muslims found out long time ago atleast we have our bengal with us
Pakistanis and Indian Muslims of todays are ALL Muslims of the Subcontinent.
The only difference between the Muslims of India and those of Pakistan and Bangldesh, is that we have our own country to represent us while Indian Muslims must rely on the charity of Indian Hindus and others.
At least Indian muslims are there in India albatta not in as good position as I would like to see them. Religious minorities from your land of the pure have disppeared a long time ago.
It's good that you accept the condition of Bharati muslims. Now consider that they are in bad condition even when living in the same areas as Hindus. Imagine what would have been the fate of muslim-majority provinces constituting Pakistan and Bangladesh had been under Hindu rule.
Al-Amaan, Al-Hafeez.
guys we pakistanis after 59 years of independence havent decided that pakistan
ISLAM KAY NAAM PAR BANA THA
or
MUSALMANO kay leay bana tha
Why do we consider that patriotic pakistani is a good muslim too.After the fall of dhaka when we killed our own muslim brothers,In various operations against mohajirs,pakhtoons of waziristan and balochs do we still consider that pakistan was made in the name of Islam.The religious parties were against the creation of pakistan.I think chaudary rehmat ali who most of the historians regard as a traitor etc becauzse of his opposition with the quaid was right about his theory of MILLAT AND HER TEN NATIONS because after the fall of dhaka muslims of sub continent were divided into three regions pakistan bangaladesh and india and if an independent kashmir then four regions and three nations atleast.
expati, “minorities” from both Punjabs (East and West) disappeared long time ago. Bharatis did the same to Muslims in East Punjab. How else could you explain all those Muslims landowners left their ancestral homes in Ludhyana, Jalandhar, and “Ambar-sar”?
Look around Himachal, Haryana, and Punjab regions of Bharat and you could count on your fingers all those Muslim landowners. This is how Bharatis turned majority 60% Muslims to a fraction of a percentage. Wah wah the tolerance of Bharatis.
UPites and Biharis are in Bharat because your Gandhi claimed them to be part of Hindu dharma so they have every right to live in Bharat. You can’t have it both ways. But then may be you could, you are a Bharati after all.
There have to BE Religious minorites for them to disappear. Whne did Pakistan ever have any significant population of minorites… Albeit, they did automatically get about about a million or more minority population following the decleration of Ahmadis as Non-Muslims.
Karachi population has grown from 300,000 to 13 million in the last 60 years. Even at 50%, Hindus would have numbered 150,000. Hindus still are a vibrant minority of Karachi and Southern Sindh. 150,000 or an extrapolated figure (3% compounded birth rate) is now a tiny fraction of 13 million.
Granted we don’t have good record. However we didn’t turn a 60% majority in East Punjab down to 0%. That honor (or dishonor in this case) goes only to Bharatis.