Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
cheese India already has similar deals with Russia and France, America is just an opening an vote, we simply made them understand the world order reality, ! don't be a American don't be a fool !
If that makes you happy..
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
By the way, Amreeka agreed to support Bharat's bid for a permanent UN seat, but it did not agree for giving Bharat veto power.
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
The GDP of India is expected to become 3rd largest in the world in the next couple of decades.
The population too is almost 1/7th (one Indian for every 7 persons in the world).
Ultimately, India will have a greater 'say' in the world - whether it be through the UNO or any new world order.. The world acknowledges this, perhaps Pakistani's should too.
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
The GDP of India is expected to become 3rd largest in the world in the next couple of decades. The population too is almost 1/7th (one Indian for every 7 persons in the world).
Ultimately, India will have a greater 'say' in the world - whether it be through the UNO or any new world order.. The world acknowledges this, perhaps Pakistani's should too.
-------------cvabn---------------
You r quite right on this,,,and I ask you when did Pakistan denied your 1 Billion population stat, or India's GDP growth, or India's economic growth stories ???
In current affairs Pakistan is struggling to over come its volatile regional issues to follow India on the same path,,, Its inevitable !
I favor India's quest for the SCS, perhaps this way it can bring some shame on its face for not honoring the resolution of the very counsel it presides !!
I also have a question : It seems that the new generation in India is being taught from tainted syllabus in your class rooms ?? If Yes! Then could you not refer to the older history packed 'true' versions ????
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
^ just curious. Why is it that Pakistanis will talk non-stop about Kashmir & UN resolutions until someone points out that it is Pakistan that was asked to remove all forces first, they completely ignore it and just go back to square one in the argument?
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
^ remove all forces ** first, **
Please provide a link to UN resolution (from UN site) where it states Pak has to withdraw FIRST.
Thank You.
P.S: This has been beaten to death on this forum but so far no one has seen a UN link...
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
Sure, that’s pretty easy. Look up un resolution 47. Or link to
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
Just give me a link to UN web site please… thanks…
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
jeez! you can go to un.org yourself and find resolution 47? May be that’s why many Pakistani people have such misunderstandings about what the Un said. Clutching at straws!
anyway, here you go; check out page 4 under section A first paragraph if it is too difficult to read through!
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=s/res/47(1948)
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
You Indians must undertsand that two can play the game, but lets play just for fun… First I challenge you to provide exact text where UN STATES that Pakistan must vacate FIRST…
Now lets say there is one just to make you guys happy, there is something that UN states before it proceeds and gets to the point of Pak TRIBESMEN withdrawal.
And fianlly its talking about Tribesmen..LOL…
Its your turn, find another and I will dig out another and another and another…
This is just like the hot air baloon and many others that you guys float from time to time, like one below.
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/world-affairs/465205-jammu-and-kashmir-removed-from-list-of-disputes-under-un.html
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
you asked for the exact link in UN and you got it. Now you’re just trying to wriggle out of it with vagueness.
It says ‘tribesmen **and **nationals’ - so please, don’t try to hide part of the truth.
Any normal reasonable and objective reader will read the UN resolution an understand what it means. You don’t want to because such acceptance of truth will negate the rationale for Pakistan’s decades of attacks into Kashmir.
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
you asked for the exact link in UN and you got it. Now you're just trying to wriggle out of it with vagueness.
It says 'tribesmen **and **nationals' - so please, don't try to hide part of the truth.
Any normal reasonable and objective reader will read the UN resolution an understand what it means. You don't want to because such acceptance of truth will negate the rationale for Pakistan's decades of attacks into Kashmir.
In a civilized world any dispute that cannot be resolved bilaterally a 3rd party gets involved and that is exactly what UN is saying (Go read again) Before you jump to withdraw paki trbes national yada yada yada. Forget 3rd party India even refused observers due to its terror, rape, turture of Kashmiri civilians (Please read HRW reports)
Play another game, I doubt even UN or any sane person will buy that.
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
In a civilized world any dispute that cannot be resolved bilaterally a 3rd party gets involved and that is exactly what UN is saying (Go read again) Before you jump to withdraw paki trbes national yada yada yada. Forget 3rd party India even refused observers due to its terror, rape, turture of Kashmiri civilians (Please read HRW reports)
Play another game, I doubt even UN or any sane person will buy that.
YOU asked for UN language - you got it.
And that language says Pakistan should withdraw its tribesmen and nationals and that India should then keep minimal forces required to maintain law and order.
Beyond that whether you admit your mistake or not, I really don't care. But I will tell you this - it takes a big heart and mind to admit one's misatakes. The evidence shows you are mistaken. Rest is up to you
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
YOU asked for UN language - you got it.
And that language says Pakistan should withdraw its tribesmen and nationals and that India should then keep minimal forces required to maintain law and order.
Beyond that whether you admit your mistake or not, I really don't care. But I will tell you this - it takes a big heart and mind to admit one's misatakes. The evidence shows you are mistaken. Rest is up to you
And that language also states very clearly that there will be a 3rd party mediator, do you have comprehension problems when nailed? It takes a big heart and mind to admit one's mistakes!!! Oh please just wait.... UN has dropped the the resolution completeley, is that not also one more BS comming out of India?
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
And that language also states very clearly that there will be a 3rd party mediator, do you have comprehension problems when nailed? It takes a big heart and mind to admit one's mistakes!!! Oh please just wait.... UN has dropped the the resolution completeley, is that not also one more BS comming out of India?
now you have lost it. What has 3rd party mediators to do with your original contention about Pakistan removing itself out of Kashmir? Denial is all you have left
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
now you have lost it. What has 3rd party mediators to do with your original contention about Pakistan removing itself out of Kashmir? Denial is all you have left
Seems like you Indians like to go in circles, Who is in Voilation if UN stipulates 3rd party mediation and then both sides withdraw?... Read your post #25 and then read up on UN resolution instead of blindly blaming Pakis..
On second thought if you believe all the BS put out by India then why not also believe that UN has droped the resolution, why this BS of beat around the bush?
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
Seems like you Indians like to go in circles, Who is in Voilation if UN stipulates 3rd party mediation and then both sides withdraw?... Read your post #25 and then read up on UN resolution instead of blindly blaming Pakis..
On second thought if you believe all the BS put out by India then why not also believe that UN has droped the resolution, why this BS of beat around the bush?
now you're just wasting time. I will try one more time and if you still don't get it, we'll just chalk it to whichever school you went to.
Get rid of this clerical mentality and learn to accept gaps in knowledge!
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
now you're just wasting time. I will try one more time and if you still don't get it, we'll just chalk it to whichever school you went to.
Get rid of this clerical mentality and learn to accept gaps in knowledge!
Yeah thats true, you said this and he said that and santa did this and banta did that... LMAO......
But you never said who is in violation of UN resolution, oh wait it has been dropped from the list so what violation.
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
Indian President Pratibha Patil is visiting Syria and UAE. Let's see whether these Muslim countries support India's entry to UNSC.
Re: Obama backs India for permanent seat on UN Security Council
Yeah thats true, you said this and he said that and santa did this and banta did that... LMAO......
But you never said who is in violation of UN resolution, oh wait it has been dropped from the list so what violation.
now this is pathetic. I will let you go at that. If you come up with any other argument let me know. Until then go back to the drawing board