North Pakistanis vs. South Pakistanis

:rotfl:
I am assuming this is all some kind of inside joke. You should be careful some people might not get it though.

Matsui, our Northies are the southern most in the hemisphere hence the darkest and ugliest in their hemi-sphere…while gujjus and Oriyas are North most in their hemisphere and the best looking dudes in their part of the globe.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ~Sehar~: *
I seriously feel like crying.
[/QUOTE]

me too :(

ookay. ( i dont even know there was such thing as south pakistani untill now) khair.. sehar can i join u guyz in the crying session? :teary1:

it is indeed a sad state of affairs suroor. let us mourn!

Re: North Pakistanis vs. South Pakistanis

IF it is true if u claim then That will make u a S.Pakistani:jhanda: ( the terms (N & S) that are unheard of before!)

Congratulations :kiss:

Sick minds are a curse on humanity...

Olivepie is Greek. Even better than N. Pakistani.

Re: North Pakistanis vs. South Pakistanis

So south Pakistanis are tanned, fit and good investors. :k:

Aren't MOST punjabuns very fat and lazy?. Specially the ones from Bhusewala

ill bring the kleenex Xsoft for sensitive skin :teary1:

Whether Northern or Southern Pakistanis, we all look the same. There is no distinction as there is in India.

[thumb=D]pakmap.JPG[/thumb]

If you observe the map, the whole of Pakistan is still above North India. So the North South divide is more realistic in India, than in Pakistan.

ISB, You are wrong. New Dehli is North of Karachi.

^ so does that mean that Karachi people are skinnier, cheaper and darker than people from New Delhi as they can be classified as "northerners"? :D

But you see, sweetpie thinks all of Karachi people migrated from Lucknow and UP which are south of New Dehli. I bet she hasn't been to Karachi. Or she wouldn't have said what she said. 60% of Karachites are second generation Punjabis.

it's o.k. ... basking in ignorance and furthering negative stereotypes seems to be a favourite pass time for some people. :)

You guys are FUNNY :k: :hehe:

Firstly Karachi doesn't count as it is a cosmopolitan city to the extent that the hereditary locals are a minority.

North Pakistan are the martial races ie Punjabi and Patthans. They are caucasian by race and are descendents of the aryans. They are generally agressive people by nature.

South Pakistan (Sindhis and Makranis) are what was known as "negro" (in pre-PC days) by race and are direct descendents of the dravidians. They have a massive chip on their shoulder and are generally sumissive by nature. That is why they are ruled by waderas etc.

The Balochis and seraikis are a mixture of the two above.

I think the ugly dravidians of pakistan and India should get together and kick the yankee doodle desis in both countries. And then if they don't convert to bahai we'll let Karina beat them up too. Folks from AL TX MS and LA welcome to join in (no Virginian vermin though)

Wow yara I don’t even know where to even begin :sar pakarney wala icon:

**
Firstly Karachi doesn’t count as it is a cosmopolitan city to the extent that the hereditary locals are a minority.
**

“Hereditary Locals??” Are we making up own lexicon? Sindhis Muslims were never a majority in Karachi.
**
North Pakistan are the martial races ie Punjabi and Patthans. They are caucasian by race and are descendents of the aryans. They are generally agressive people by nature.
**

Aryans are caucasian, but not vice versa. There is no actual evidence that Pashtuns are Aryans, their backgrounds have been classified from the lost tribes of Israel (Semitic) to Alex the Great. Punjabis are Scythians not Aryans.
**
South Pakistan (Sindhis and Makranis) are what was known as “negro” (in pre-PC days) by race and are direct descendents of the dravidians. **

Sindhis are negros?? Have YOU SEEN a Sindhi lately :hehe: Sindhis are Jatts/Rajputs who share much ancestory (genetic anyway) with Punjabis. Makranis have been classified not as Negros but of Non Negro-Caucasoid stock…similar to the aboriginals of South East Asia/Austrialia.

**
They have a massive chip on their shoulder and are generally sumissive by nature. That is why they are ruled by waderas etc.
**

So what about the Punjabis ruled by their Chaudhry’s? Pashtuns by their Maliks? Lets not get carried away with these generalizations.
**
The Balochis and seraikis are a mixture of the two above. **

Baluchis mixture of the two? :hehe: Baluchis, my good man are pure Aryans have very much Iranian blood. Only Brauhis can be called Dravidians (and Dravis are not Negroes either!). What the heck is a “Seraiki”? It’s a language. If you want to call them North Sindhis or South Punjabis then they would be a mixture of those two.

Mashallah, with this great knowledge, I am sure you leave everyone stunned in your wake :slight_smile: