Non-functional Chief Justice v Supreme Judicial Council

Re: Non-functional Chief Justice v Supreme Judicial Council

When other judges resigned in protest at being asked to swear an oath on the “tin pots” PCO, Justice Iftikhar took their place on the Supreme Court after duly swearing on it. Now his counsel is saying that other judges are waiting to take his place when he is formally removed. There is no getting past that. :rolleyes: Ch. Iftikhar also gave the “tin pot” validation through the “doctrine of neccessity” judgement in May 2000. No getting past that as well.

I have admitted no one in this whole drama has principles, including the non-functional CJ.