New Zealand Vs India 2nd Test Match

MISERABLE INDIANS DO IT AGAIN
By Tapan Joshi
Mumbai, December 20, 2002

The Indians are most consistent when it comes to under-performing abroad. Once again, this bunch of over-paid, over-pampered cricketers has fallen to an ordinary medium pacer on a bowler-friendly wicket. :k:

**The Indians knew they just can’t bat in conditions other than their own. And the New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming hit the nail on the head when he questioned the Indians’ so called greatness in batting. :biggthumb **

On wickets and in conditions where the movement and the swing last for a few balls, leave alone overs, and where the bounce is as high as one’s knees, any idiot can manage 20-30 runs :hehe: and even a club tweaker on absolute dust-bowls can bundle out the opposition cheaply.

**So what do the Indians do? They obviously can’t win the battle on the field, so they start wagging their tongues. “There is no difference in the outfield and the wicket!” “This is not an ideal Test match wicket!” “It’s too bowler-friendly, we can’t play our strokes.” So, these jokers, :rotfl: who average more than 50 in Test matches, want conditions suited to their batting style so they can maintain their averages :eek: . How rude of New Zealand cricket authorities… they should have thought about it! Apologize immediately, Mr. Fleming!! **

The Indians also rope in the likes of Harsha Bhogle to join in the party. His brief – whenever you are on air, just say this is a bad wicket, this will kill Test match cricket, etc, etc. After all, the genial Bhogle needs them for Harsha Online… he has to be at their beck and call!

C’mon you miserable Indian cricketers, use your bats rather than tongues or else, admit you are no good and get out from that place.

::: Tapan Joshi

[Source: cricketnext.com]

These our comments from One seriusly pissed off journalist :rotfl:

:hehe: :hehe: :hehe:

WOW, the journalist is mad! :rotfl: :rotfl:

Someone brought up the score of Pakistan’s test matches in Newzeland, if you want to do that let me bring up other scores from that series as well. Afterall this isn’t the only test where the Indians have fallen pathetically on their butts. How can you guys forget the thrashing you recived just a week before.

Here are the complete series scores when Pakistan visisted NZ.

Auckland: 346 & 336 Pakistani batsman in the innings
Imran Farhat, Saleem Elahi, Mizbah ul Haq, Yousuf Youhana, Younis Khan, Faisal Iqbal
Result- Pakistan won by 299 runs. :eek:

Christchurch: 571 runs
Imran Farhat, Ijaz Ahmed, Faisal Iqbal, Inzimam ul Haq, Yousuf Youhana, Younis Khan, Moin Khan.
Result draw.

If a pathetic Pakistani lineup can score this nicely than how come the most over rated and overpaid batting lineup in the world can’t even score past 175.

Pakistan went on to draw the series.

Even Saqlain Mushtaq scored a cenutry in that series.
Shame Shame! :nono:

Yes..Every TOM,DICK and HARRY scored in Christchurch.But wehat happened in next match in Hamilton… 104 and 118 . :hehe:
and bolwers..Tuffy,Frnaklin and some other GUmnam … !!!

That explains that what is hamilton.

Dear ,fact is that all Suncontinant team suck when they play on bouncy wicket.and Pakistan is no exception.Forget about bouncy wicket.You guys can noot even cross 60 in 2 ining of test match in Sharjah.

Lads can we stick to the topic in hand only.

I just saw the match highlights and i saw the comments made by Harsha Bhogle and Naujaut Sidhu.
Bhogle asked Sidhu ‘What do you think? Match should have stated or not’ Sidu said well this match should have started today coz winning a toss is always crucial and Bowling team will have an advantage and India was so low on confidence, Losing the toss didnt help them either.’

:hehe: :rotfl: Match shouldnt have started coz India was so down on confidence? :woowowwo nice argument…

and to say that conditions were not of test match standards, Think again bhogle and Sidhu saab , this is NZL , not India. Ha they gong through this day successfully, next day would have been much easier for batting.

who said " Match shouldnt have started coz India was so down on confidence? "

where did you get this from?? you post and yoru conclusion doesnt make sense?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *

who said " Match shouldnt have started coz India was so down on confidence? "

where did you get this from?? you post and yoru conclusion doesnt make sense?
[/QUOTE]

this wsa the first thing Sing said..
,match sholdnt have started coz india was down on confidence and then bla bla... anyways defend it as you like. But thats unfair if they play well on bouncy pitches in engalnd, they are 'this' great and that 'brilliant'?? and if they dont, pitches and conditions are to blame?

Well right now india has almost the smiliar conditions, lets see how they bowl :)

OK, lets just say India had an off day yesterday, what about the previous test match, how can you defend such a pathetic performance.

As of rightnow, even the Pakistani batsman look superior to our neighbors.

This is just in
India bowled out for 99.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

NZL 48/4 .. Innntresting....

:hehe: But to be fair, Pakistan has to live down the 57-all-out too. But at least Pakistan has men bowling for it and not weak woinkies :hehe:

But then this same week woinikies got you for 104 and 118 in same test match. :wink:

http://statserver.cricket.org/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/2000-01/PAK_IN_NZ/SCORECARDS/PAK_NZ_T3_27-31MAR2001.html

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Dude, learn to read. The woinkies are the Indian bowlers not NZ. :hehe: