^^ Your cannot think beyond the saying of yoru "peer"
Aap ko khawb may bhie peer nazar aata hay tou may kiya karyoon? Why don't you stay with the topic and talk relevant? :)
[quote]
It is now evident and proven that the militancy in the FATA, Balochistan and Northern region is directly sponsored by India and backed by USA.
How many of these event took place when these Americans and Indians were not sitting on our northern borders?
Remember Swat was a tourist site??? who converted this tourist heaven into a war zone, who sponsored it!!! it is Indians backed by Americans.. the sooner you understand the better it is. but with the mentallity to hate others till death, won't help anyone.
[/quote]
I do not agree that terrorism in FATA, Baluchistan and Northern area (Swat, etc) are sponsored by USA and India. I think that terrorism in FATA and NA are done by retards who want to impose their Shaitanic cult over Pakistan (there examples are Retards of Lal Masjid and Mullah Radio of Swat).
As for problem in Baluchistan, that is political though taking advantage of that political problem, India and possibly USA might be using them for their purpose too. India is responding to Pakistan support of Kashmiris in Kashmir. Whereas, USA did not like Musharraf policy of giving China influence in Gawader and agreeing trade with Iran, including insisting on gas IPI project. Anyhow, to please Americans, Present political government is distancing themselves from China and IPI project is also getting shelved.
Anyhow: suppose what you believe is right and problem in these areas are due to America and India, then also question arises that what Pakistan can do about it? Obviously Pakistan is not in a position to send forces in Afghanistan to occupy Afghanistan and get Americans out of there, or let Pakistani soil used by miscreants to fight their war against USA in Afghanistan. As, if Pakistan would do that than it would be taking confrontation with USA, that is not in interest of Pakistan economically as well as militarily. Any such confrontation is unacceptable and out of question. Pakistan is also not in a position to occupy Delhi militarily and thus force India from sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan.
So, Pakistan only has one option, that is to kill these terrorists who are Indian and American sponsored ... and are making life in Pakistan difficult.
[quote]
Infact in those times, Someone in Karachi was doing almost the same, hitting Interests of Pakistan. Killing Innocents and bombing here and there.
[/quote]
Again, you are wrong. Nothing ever happened in Karachi that was against Pakistan or interest of Pakistan. There is no doubt that government of Pakistan always did injustice and discriminated against people of Karachi. Karachi had genuine reasons to fight for their rights. If a political party representing Karachi fought Pakistani government and establishment for their rights than there was nothing wrong with it. If whatever propaganda is true, than only bad happened was that many innocent Pakistanis who came to Karachi to find jobs may have became victim. Nevertheless, many Karachiets also become victim of government atrocities at that time.
Worse is that, innocents did not became victim only in Karachi (both locals and non-locals), but that has happened in Sindh and Baluchistan too (that is still happening). At both places (along with Karachi) Pakistan government and establishment did (rather doing) injustice and discriminating against locals. Regularly people fight in these areas against injustice and discrimination with result that locals by government forces and non-locals by locals get victimised.
Solution of Karachi was there, that to give people of Karachi equal rights and control over their lives, what all Pakistanis should have. As for these Fisadis, they are not fighting to get their rights or control over their lives. They want to control lives of others all over Pakistan. If they were fighting against injustices and discrimination, or wanted to have control over their own lives, than it was fine. In thst situation, Pakistan would have looked at their grievances and would have sorted that out.