Re: Nalain of Rasool SAWS
I meant the debate can’t be won - in the sense that the protractors will either accuse the people of doing shirk based on dubious definitions of shirk or accuse the people of shirk based on dubious understandings behind the intent of the people. When the people defend themselves from one side they get hit by the other and when defending the other side they get hit by the other.
I didn’t mean that this debate does not have a clear resolution … Of course it does … the clear resolution is this:
**If you yourself have reservations then avoid it, but if you see there is possibility of it being okay/permissible then do not condemn others for it … **