When a State goes around looking at who owns what and asks them to justify where they got the money to buy it, it is in my opinion, a witch hunt. I would feel more comfortable if the State would provide proof of (the specific crime) that generated the money. Then, prove how someone used these funds to buy something not the other way around. Otherwise, the State is basically assuming the guy is guilty until proven innocent, because he owns something. This would be an example of big brother government gone crazy. Nobody likes to see governments exercising this kind of power. The potential for abuse by incumbent would cloud the truth. In the case of Musharraf it is clear he was persuing a policy against radical followers of Sharia. So sympathizers of radical followers of Sharia would be expected to conduct witch hunts against Musharraf. So unless you can provide specific proof of embezzlement against Musharraf taking money from government contracts, it really doesnt interest me and makes me suspicious of why someone wants to conduct a witch hunt against him.
^ So the 90% or so of the country's population that wanted Musharraf out and held for his crimes/corruption are just witch hunters and radical followers of Sharia? Those that want Zardari investigated as well, what are they?
Musharraf actually helped the radical followers of sharia. Remember something called the military mollah alliance? Radicals flourished and created trouble thanks to his two faced policies, but this topic is about his embezzlement and property fraud.