Re: Mush , ready to flee
It seems one of the items on the agenda in the recent Zardari Nawaz meeting was Musharraf. He has been moved to Karachi from where most probably he'd be deported, the federal government can shrug their shoulders and look towards Sindh who can then point towards the medical reports/treatment of the dictator.
اللّہ اللّہ خیر سلّا
Re: Mush , ready to flee
If I was at place of Musharraf, I would have made plea openly in court that, if what I did was treachery then hang me. I am sure that Kanjars in power would not even dare to do that, but even if they do that, it does not matter.
Good thing is that, next time army would take over power in Pakistan (and since political thugs like Bhuttos, Zardaris, Shareef, never change their clothing, army takeover is certain), they would hang all politicians, judges, bureaucrats who are perceived corrupt, and army would not leave power for next 50 to 100 years ... InshaAllah.
Each army General as President would appoint current army chief to take him over if anything happen to him or whenever he retires or resigns.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
بھاگنے سے پہلے ایک گارڈ آف آنر سندھ گورنمٹ کی طرف سے ہو جاے.مشرف بیٹھا بھی کراچی ہے آج کل
For old times sake.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
Main darta warta kisi say naheen hoon magar chhupta phirta hoon
And what do you think , they are sincere to each other
Simple , We don’t know that . But Ayoub with seniors , Yahya with Ayoub , Gul Hassan and others with Yahya , And Kiani with Mush , there are some stories .
Be Happy , This Raymond Davis is going to repeat the history .سندھ ہائیکورٹ کا پرویز مشرف کا نام ای سی ایل سے نکالنے کی درخواست پر وفاق سے جواب طلب](http://www.express.pk/story/247477/)
Re: Mush , ready to flee
بھاگنے سے پہلے ایک گارڈ آف آنر سندھ گورنمٹ کی طرف سے ہو جاے.مشرف بیٹھا بھی کراچی ہے آج کل For old times sake.
Wohi Salook Jo Ramond Davis kay Sath Takht e Lahore nay kia tha
Re: Mush , ready to flee
Wohi Salook Jo Ramond Davis kay Sath Takht e Lahore nay kia tha
it seems as if Sindh government would repeat that this time around.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
In Pakistan, loyalty to country is judged by how much a person looted the country … so, obviously, using that criteria, Musharraf is traitor. 
As far as I am concerned, Musharraf deserved to get hanged for one reason alone, and that is, when promoting people at crucial posts, Musharraf did not see loyalty to himself, and that in Pakistani environment is cardinal sin. Following and honouring seniority and merit in Pakistan environment, especially when promoting people at crucial post, is asking for future trouble. And military ruler should be brutal too, that is, … aab agay nahi kah saktay.
If I was in place of Musharraf (that something next military ruler would do) is that, always have loyal men occupying crucial posts, especially in armed forces (army, navy and airforce) but in judiciary, bureaucracy, and police too. Loyalty to General in power should be biggest criteria for promotion then seniority and merit. On the other hand, if even sensing disloyalty from anyone at crucial places, action should be similar to what Asad, Saddam, Saudi King, Sadaat, Mubarak, Qadafi, Shah of Iran … hmm Adi Amin used to do.
For sake of country, a military ruler should not leave any opposition, be they in armed forces, bureaucracy, judiciary, police, media or elsewhere, alive in the country.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
For me, Musharraf is dispensable if it would trigger 'brutal, bloody, and long lasting' military rule as I would like to see.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
For sake of country, a military ruler should not leave any opposition, be they in armed forces, bureaucracy, judiciary, police, media or elsewhere, alive in the country.
What an ideal (and robotic country) Pakistan would be if there was no dissent of any kind. :p
Re: Mush , ready to flee
^^^ If this would happen for 50 years than it would be good for all, including country. After that, jatni dissent ho jayea koyee baat nahie. :)
Re: Mush , ready to flee
Yes,the 'brutal, bloody, and long lasting' military rule' has done wonders to Middle East. Indeed, Middle Eastern dictatorial, despotic, disgraced regimes are heaven on earth with flowing rivers of milk and honey.
Pakistani musn't lose hope and patience. They just need to go back to their roots, revisit the message and adopt the appointed method of a civilian that gave them with this country, and warned them about keeping the guards in check.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
^^^ The civilians who gave a country to Pakistan were not Kanjars like Bhuttos, Zardaris, and Shareefs.
Quaid-e-Azam gave away all his assets and acquired wealth to nation, that he built using legally earned money as lawyer. Even in UK (Earls court) there is a building donated by Quaid-e-Azam to Pakistan that was (and probably is today even) used as subsidized residence for Pakistani students.
Liaquat Ali Khan was rich landlord, but at time of death he was using clothing that had patches.
Today's Kanjars illegitimately occupy parliament (most could not even contest election, as they are liars, morally deformed, and thieves). Shareef, Bhuttos and Zardaris have looted and plundered the country and now are sitting on billions of dollars looted wealth. I posted a video you should watch, and see what world think of present day civilian Kanjars in power.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
Here is recent survey about what Pakistan needs, military rule or thug democracy.
The Independent (British newspaper)
**ANDREW BUNCOMBE **](http://www.independent.co.uk/biography/andrew-buncombe-8160153.html)
Wednesday 03 April 2013
Pakistan’s youth favour Sharia law and military rule over democratic governance
… … …
… … …
According to the poll, conducted by the British Council, only 29 per cent of young Pakistanis believe democracy is the best political system for the country.
By contrast, 32 per cent support governance by the military, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half its history, while 38 per cent said they believed the country should be ruled according to Islamic law. Indeed, while the civilian government has just 14 per cent of public support, the army is supported by 77 per cent of those questioned.
… … …
… … …
… … …
After 6 years of civilian thugs in power (from 2008 to 2014), only 14 percent (probably corrupts benefiting from corruption) support civilian government … and 77 percent wanted army rule.
That means, if army take over the country (hanging thugs in power) than it would be according to people’s wishes (or according to democratic principle).
Re: Mush , ready to flee
You called … to Farooq Sattar and these all and senators .
[TABLE=“width: 648, align: left”]
[TABLE=“width: 648, align: center”]
[TR]
[TD=“colspan: 5, align: center”][TABLE=“width: 648, align: center”]
[TR]
[TD=“align: center”][TABLE=“width: 641”]
[TR]
[TD=“align: left”]NA-240 Sohail Mansoor Khawaja
NA-241 Syed Akhterul Iqbal Qadri
NA-242 Mehboob Alam
NA-243 Abdul Waseem
NA-244 Sheikh Salahuddin
NA-245 Muhammad Rehan Hashmi
NA-247 Sufyan Yousuf
NA-249 Doctor Muhammad Farooq Sattar
NA-252 Adbul Rashid Godil
NA-257 Sajid Ahmed
NA-219 Dr. Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui
NA-220 Syed Waseem Hussain
NA-239 Mohammad Salman Khan Baloch
NA-251 Syed Ali Raza Abidi
NA-253 Muhammad Muzammil Qureshi
NA-255 Syed Asif Hasnain
NA-256 Iqbal Muhammad Ali Khan
NA-246 Sardar Nabeel Ahmed Gabol
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TD]
[/TR]
Re: Mush , ready to flee
If I was at place of Musharraf, I would have made plea openly in court that, if what I did was treachery then hang me. I am sure that Kanjars in power would not even dare to do that, but even if they do that, it does not matter.
Good thing is that, next time army would take over power in Pakistan (and since political thugs like Bhuttos, Zardaris, Shareef, never change their clothing, army takeover is certain), they would hang all politicians, judges, bureaucrats who are perceived corrupt, and army would not leave power for next 50 to 100 years ... InshaAllah.
Each army General as President would appoint current army chief to take him over if anything happen to him or whenever he retires or resigns.
Just for sake of Mush you want to destroy Pakistan. "Na rahay ga bhans na bajay gi bansuri"
Re: Mush , ready to flee
So what?
As far as I am concerned, anyone of the above you mentioned (and anyone in parliament, be they from any party), who do not qualify to contest election as they are liars, loan defaulters, thieves, plunderers, corrupts, etc … still contested election and are now parliamentarians, did corruption while in parliament holding meaningful posts … or even have perception that they are involved in corruption for personal gains while in power … then to me, they are Kanjars.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
Just for sake of Mush you want to destroy Pakistan. "Na rahay ga bhans na bajay gi bansuri"
Not really. For me, Musharraf is dispensable and i did write that. I do not mind if Musharraf gets hanged or get deported ... as Musharraf to me is irrelevant ... alive or dead ... but what I want is that, in process Pakistan gets brutal and bloody military rule that hangs all corrupts who ever held government post or benefited from corrupts in power (politicians, bureaucracy, judiciary, police, journalists, media houses, lawyers, etc), hangs their family members who benefited from them, and confiscate their all wealth (in country and outside country), and then military rule stays in power for over 50 years.
I would not like to see 8 to 10 years bloodless military rule, as that does not change much. What I am wishing is for bloody and brutal military rule, passing from one general to next, that should last for 50 years or more.
Re: Mush , ready to flee
Not really. For me, Musharraf is dispensable and i did write that. I do not mind if Musharraf gets hanged (or get deported) and in process Pakistan gets brutal and bloody military rule that hangs all corrupts who ever held government post (politicians, bureaucracy, judiciary, police, etc), hangs their family members who benefited from them, and confiscate their all wealth (in country and outside country), and than stays in power for over 50 years.
All generals were/are corrupt how they hang the corrupts?
Re: Mush , ready to flee
^^^ No problem. Generals have done that at many places in history (even corrupt generals have done that and enjoyed such hanging). What is big deal to hang corrupt thugs ruling the country in the name of democracy? :)