Re: Muharram Starts!!! Some Important Questions to Ask (Exclusive)
In Saqeefa Bani Sa'adah, when the Ansaar intended to appoint a caliph from among themselves, had anybody raised the matter that it was incorrect **to make a decision when Rasulullaah (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) has already **appointed Hadhrat Ali (radhiyAllaahu anhu) as caliph?** Laters*, when a few migrated companions (radhiyAllaahu anhum) reached there and said that the caliph should be from among the* muhaajireen** (migratees) and the Ansars kept silent, nobody stood up and said that none from the new comers should be the caliph because Rasulullaah (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) had already given the caliphate to Hadhrat Ali (radhiyAllaahu anhu). If this was true. This would have been the best place to say so. Even at this golden opportunity, no one did so.
With these facts a researching student is forced to come to the correct conclusion that Rasulullaah (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) had not nominated his successor. The Islaamic system of government is the system of Shura (consultation). The issue of appointing Hadhrat Ali (radhiyAllaahu anhu) at Gadeer‑I‑Khum is no more than a fabrication. The wish concerning the bequeath of his caliphate also shows that** no declaration** with regard to anybody's caliphate was made at the bank of the pond at Khum.
Very true and excellent explanation of the whole matter... Yes islamic shura has a ultimate authority to decide about thier caliph... Prophetr(pbuh) never imposed his rulings in "wordly Affairs" on sahabas , in wars , about prisioners , in war plans .. he always consulted all the sahabas and do you now think , on issue of caliphate , he will "Impose" his family to all the ummah.... No sir !!!! Prophet(pbuh) was free from such unjustice.... No doubt that ahle bait have very high respect and maqamo martaba , but this never ever mean that , they have a "Right" to rule "Forever" on this "ummah" and no ummah's decision and freedom of expression and speech is allowed... No Sir..........!!!! never ever.......It is totally unjustice , resembling to Sassanid rule of Iran that the same chain of family will have to rule , our prophet(pbuh) , the most just ruler of human history cannot do such Unjustice ... we cannot even think about him of this unjustice !!!!!!!!.
Let me again into the pool of history :
- in ghazva Mauta , prophet(pbuh) made zaid bin harisa(ra) , the commander od army when jaffar bin abi talib(ra) requsted for this post , prophet(pbuh) blankly turn down this request by saying that zaid has more **right **to command the army......
- when in some battle , prisiones came to medina , fatima(ra) asked ali(ra) to go to prophet(pbuh) to request for** 1 prisioner** as fatima(ra) had to do a lot of work and his body turn blue and black with this heavy work.. ali(ra) came to prophet(pbuh) but prophet(pbuh) replied there are still** Ashab-e- Suffa in** medine , i cannot give it to you while they remained ** hungry** sometimes for 3 days......
- nowdays some shias sayyid do not wed in non-sayyid of being "Superiority" while prophet(pbuh) gave his** 2 daughters to usman(ra) ,** a non sayyid , and marriied a zainab(ra) to zaid nin harris (ra) , also non-hashmi or sayyid.... 4.ali(ra) himself married his daughter to umar(ra) as i proved above.
By all these incidents , i certainly do not mean to some sort of De-grading ahle bait but only proving that despite of virtues of ahle -bait , they were never given some "Special Status" in the society by prophet(pbuh) themselves and thet were as normal as others ............For allah says in Quran that (** Verily , near Allah , the more noble is who has greater taqwa and piety """""**
and we believe in that ........