If the US can name various places after, racist, slave owners, criminals, murderers and war criminals then whats with Pakistan doing so? The UK has various places named after Winston Churchill who called Gandhi a dirty little beggar and was by all accounts a racist.
If the US can name various places after, racist, slave owners, criminals, murderers and war criminals then whats with Pakistan doing so? The UK has various places named after Winston Churchill who called Gandhi a dirty little beggar and was by all accounts a racist.
hahahaha.. i was just wondering why US hasnt been dragged into this thread yet. so here we go.
Ofcourse Winston churchill did nothing for UK , so yes why the hell he was given respect. Quadri has for sure served his country far more than churchill, isnt it?! :)
hahahaha.. i was just wondering why US hasnt been dragged into this thread yet. so here we go.
Ofcourse Winston churchill did nothing for UK , so yes why the hell he was given respect. Quadri has for sure served his country far more than churchill, isnt it?! :)
Good to know that people defend racist, slave owners and war criminals because they are white.
Instead of "hahahaha", why don't you try some counter-arguments?
Cuz thats not worth it my friend.
A person is dignified in his own country on the basis of what he's done for them. Churchill proved to be one of the best politicians ever. Especially the way he brought his country back to track during and after second world war. Now if he was a racist or no, a normal briton wont care cuz he did his job for the country.
And comparing him with Quadri? I mean i'm stumped on the match.
Tomorrow if Modi comes in power in India and make his country a super power like the way many are anticipating, do you think he wont be or shouldnt be given respect? We all know how he thinks about muslims.
And first of all, stop comparing Pakistan with any other countries. Especially under these conditions it wont help you at all.
Admit it, quadri is a criminal. he should be punished for it and thats all.
A person is dignified in his own country on the basis of what he's done for them. Churchill proved to be one of the best politicians ever. Especially the way he brought his country back to track during and after second world war. Now if he was a racist or no, a normal briton wont care cuz he did his job for the country.
And comparing him with Quadri? I mean i'm stumped on the match.
Tomorrow if Modi comes in power in India and make his country a super power like the way many are anticipating, do you think he wont be or shouldnt be given respect? We all know how he thinks about muslims.
And first of all, stop comparing Pakistan with any other countries. Especially under these conditions it wont help you at all.
Admit it, quadri is a criminal. he should be punished for it and thats all.
Ignorance is the best in the West. The comparison was not of character or quality. It was an example of freedom of expression. If a racist, a man who ordered the execution of war prisoners, their torture and ordered the bombing of civilians can be considered a great politician and have numerous things named after him and its considered acceptable and celebrated. Well what I can say to the moral compass of that person?
There is no difference between that person and a Qadri supporter. But both have the right to name whatever location as they wish. You can disagree with it, but the Freedom of expression is sound.
There is no difference between that person and a Qadri supporter. But both have the right to name whatever location as they wish. You can disagree with it, but the Freedom of expression is sound.
I've no idea where the freedom of expression came from?
Churchill didnt do anything bad to their own people, he protected and revived his country. You can declare him racist and dont respect him in outside world for wutever grounds but his country would luv him.
Quadri killed his own countryman, his governor, he didnt even perform the duty he was supposed to do. Based on wut? His own judgement that Salman taseer should be killed?? Thats how we are going to solve our issues now?
I hate this back n forth arguments and hv already submitted my case but for the last time, can you please answer this in yes or no, do you support naming a masjid on quadri's name?
I've no idea where the freedom of expression came from?
Churchill didnt do anything bad to their own people, he protected and revived his country. You can declare him racist and dont respect him in outside world for wutever grounds but his country would luv him.
Quadri killed his own countryman, his governor, he didnt even perform the duty he was supposed to do. Based on wut? His own judgement that Salman taseer should be killed?? Thats how we are going to solve our issues now?
I hate this back n forth arguments and hv already submitted my case but for the last time, can you please answer this in yes or no, do you support naming a masjid on quadri's name?
Wow. So you are ignoring reality and history. Taking a one sided view point in all of this. I bet you think they should name a street after him as well because he protected his country from those evil 2 year old girls. After all he " didnt do anything bad to their own people, he protected and revived his country".
There would be nothing wrong in that as well right?
can you please answer this in yes or no, do you support naming a masjid on quadri's name?
As expected, you didnt answer my question. I'll take it as Yes unless you deny.
Wow. So you are ignoring reality and history. Taking a one sided view point in all of this. I bet you think they should name a street after him as well because he protected his country from those evil 2 year old girls. After all he " didnt do anything bad to their own people, he protected and revived his country".
There would be nothing wrong in that as well right?
You can keep comparing Quadri with Churchill, obama, Thetcher , Gandhi or whoever you want. Fact remains that people who have more accomplishments for their country are and will always given respect no matter how other nations would think.
If Putin is termed as evil in US doesnt mean he should not be rewarded or given respect in his own country. He's doing wuts the best for his country and thats all wut matters.
And the answer of your question is NO, if anyone does bad to their people they should be held accountable for that but it'll be decided by their own people and we are not among them.
I hate bush for what he did to others but he'll be given all due respect in US for serving his own country.
You want to talk about morality? Ask the woman whose husband was assassinated by a moron and his young son is missing for so much time. How about naming few masjids for those abductors as well.
As expected, you didnt answer my question. I'll take it as Yes unless you deny.
You can keep comparing Quadri with Churchill, obama, Thetcher , Gandhi or whoever you want. Fact remains that people who have more accomplishments for their country are and will always given respect no matter how other nations would think.
If Putin is termed as evil in US doesnt mean he should not be rewarded or given respect in his own country. He's doing wuts the best for his country and thats all wut matters.
And the answer of your question is NO, if anyone does bad to their people they should be held accountable for that but it'll be decided by their own people and we are not among them.
I hate bush for what he did to others but he'll be given all due respect in US for serving his own country.
You want to talk about morality? Ask the woman whose husband was assassinated by a moron and his young son is missing for so much time. How about naming few masjids for those abductors as well.
Such double standards. Is Qadri one of your people?
I am talking about the American who killed Afghan Children. By your standard he can be named a hero.
Such double standards. Is Qadri one of your people?
O dear.. DUH , unfortunately he's pakistani so yes he's one of "my" people. The person he murdered on the name of religion was one of "my" people too.
I am talking about the American who killed Afghan Children. By your standard he can be named a hero.
No, not for me. And now we've jumped from Churchill to american soldiers. You gotto understand how armies are treated within their own nation while different for others. But if my examples for Putin and modi didnt help you understand it, nothing else will.
and now IK is abusing/accusing same CJ IIftikhar... i guess IK himself have become AP
and if he was opposing CJ in the "CJ Ifti movement" he would've been labelled 'pro-dictator', I guess some people are bound to criticize no matter what you do :)