I don’t see anything wrong with it infact its a must for everyone to be well groomed and well dress irrespectve of whether they are male of female. I really appreciate guys taking care of how they look and not just wanting their wives to be glammed up all the time.
Who wants a husband with a big tidd and messy hair? :khums:
the other day i was talking to my friend who told me about the husband of a mutual friend who is crazy about trends and fashion which is indeed not a bad thing. but its my biased generalization that as a husband they are nitpicker, obsessed with themselves, obsessed with status (only like to hang out with beautiful, rich and famous), want everything perfect, want their wife dolled up all the time, obsessed with brand label.
may be its my extreme generalization but they care less about the emotions.
Peace zobia
I think what you have described here is the characteristic "pretty boy" ... metrosexuals often have rough beards, long hair and almost camp in their outlook, but are indeed heterosexual. They are so laid back with sexuality they are free with both gays and women and as a result they tend to draw the attention of fashion crazed women.
There is no relation in being fashion conscious and caring for emotions. You are trying to describe materialistic husbands and not metrosexual or style conscious. A simple paindoo man can also be very materialistic and careless about emotions. (I am an example :D )
who used the term tight? the term used was tight-er, well fitted is tighter than loose. fitted shirts and trousers are perfectly fine and if a dude’s clothes are more fitted/tighter/streamlined/modern cut/slim fit etc etc compared to his wife that is perfectly fine, if he has the physique to carry it, I mean as long as it is still sensible and in good taste