It was not really a religious place. Money, knowledge and political power was kept inside and hidden from common people by Evil Berhamans who treated others like low class people.
Jesus Christ (Issa AS) in his days was also against institutionalization of religious places to make common people 'slaves' so to speak.
The attack needed to be done one way or other. Hindus of the time were in Mehmood's kingdom later and supported him very well.
In fact Mehmood treated hindus very nicely. Your information is based on limited knowledge based on hatred.
Besides as I mentioned earlier, Hindu Rajas commonly attacked other hindu people for centuries and robbed them of their money or killed them. These poor people were robbed twice or in two ways. Outside by this Hindu Rajas and inside by Berhamans.
Moral:
Don't rob people and hide the money in Idols.
Don't use these placed to make others slaves in the name of religion.
You failed to provide me a response to my earlier post.That shows all.....
You cant even give us a satisfactory answer to why this gay looter attacked the roots of a holy family,of ISLAM.
So from now onwards I should reckon Shia/Sunni mosques in to your category because Shias and Sunnis often attack each other and each other's worship places?
What could be the justification of Iranian terrorists who attacked Mecca?A place you consider holy or divine.
Ghaznavi treated Hindus well? Such a gay looter was only interested in killing Muslims Hindus and others and nothing else.
So the bottom line is that:-
Do not side with,even for the sake of invainly defaming one side, a brabaric gay looter who even attacked the family roots of a holy figure.
Do not be subjucted to state sponsored programmes.It can't even give you limited knowledge,but just craps .