Mehmood Ghaznavi

[Arleitter]

@""COlD_FIRE""

First of all Mr. Aleitter, Our hero is always going to be your villain, its simple as that**. So no matter how much i would like to think otherwise, your needle is going to stuck where ever it’s stuck. Agree???

Secondly, i like how u try to come up with wiki as your help, but how unlikely that a person as astute as yours in your personal views, would like to omit what he would like and would like to justify what he wants, from the same website link.

Well, lemme bust your bubble…
From wiki,

The later invasions of Mahmud were specifically directed to temple towns as Indian temples were depositories of great wealth and the Economic and Ideological Centers of Gravity for the Hindus, Destroying them would destroy the will power of the Hindus attacking the Empire since Mahmud never kept a permanent prescience in the Subcontinent; Nagarkot, Thanesar, Mathura, Kanauj, Kalinjar and Somnath were all thus raided. Mahmud’s armies stripped the temples of their wealth and then destroyed them at Varanasi, Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, Narunkot and Dwarka. During the period of Mahmud invasion, the Sindhi Swarankar Community and other Hindus who escaped conversion fled from Sindh to escape sectarian violence, and settled in various villages in the district of Kutch, in modern-day Gujarat, India.

And if u read carefully… it goes on to establish Ghaznavi as a very shrewd planner and military strategist… why…

1- By stripping the temples off their wealth, he actually destroyed the will power of hindus, from military point of view.

2- R.S.Jayaswal writes that “ In these kingdoms there was a lot of inefficiency, the so called heads grabbed lands and distributed among themselves, the rest were persecuted.”

3- And u don’t use a horrid term like a ‘looter’ with a SULTAN. Get it?

Its just like Europe’s old opinion against Napoleon Bonaparte. Unlike the French.

So dear, its just the mind set. Unfortunately, and regrettably, i do understand ur pain, as Hindus can’t come up with a single Heroic entity. All through history and beyond. So yeah, i feel for you.

Apologies for a long reply. Adios.

My dear friend,could not you come up with anything else better than this?Your own fabricated analysis does not make any impression in us other than going through a post,which is pretty similar in nature as of other Pak guppies,who have been posting here for many years,but without making any sense at all.

A looter and a bloodthirsty gay like Mehmood Ghaznavi does not deserve to be called a Sultan.First of all,he did not have any respect or values towards Islam ,and his barbaric deeds on other Muslims show it.His relationship with his slave Ayaz Amir(Either Ayas was the queen' and Ghaznavi was his Pappoo or Ghaznavi was the queen’ or Ayaz was his Pappoo , either way :hehe)shows he had little care for Islamic values and he is not just a looter but a low life looter who did not have any self laws or policies in place.

Yes you feel for it.I welcome it because I understand the trauma Islam is facing now,despite having so many great leadres (Like ShehenShah,Akbar,Abdali,Kamal Pasha of Turk etc )and having so many so many blood thirsty Anti-Islamic Muslim looters(Like Ghaznavi,Aurangazib,Shahjahan,Timor etc etc ).Your state sponsored statement like Hindus can’t come up with a single Heroic entity is all you can sell with Kids in Pakistan Sorry for being sarcastic… Your leaders and historians wont comment it again … You know what I mean…hopefully…

Also you said…

**First of all Mr. Aleitter, Our hero is always going to be your villain, its simple as that… **

And viceversa… You forgot it nicely…

And burn oil for many… is,We rennovated Somnath Temple and it attracts millions of people… So the power of destruction is failed and has given way for power of construction,beauty and charmness…