Relevance? No one is talking about your interpretation of Islam. This thread concerns the Islamist interpretation of Islam. Care to comment on Mawdudi and Qutb’s words?
Click on the link. I didn’t post the whole article.
CM’s game is now clear. He deliberately seeks to obfuscate what Islamists believe. This is a consistent Islamist tactic. They know if people find out what they believe and what they intend to do very few people will support them.
Islamist’s say “sovereignty belongs to god.” How is that enforced? In their view, through an Islamic state. There is no contradiction between the Islamist ideological belief in divine sovereignty in theory and theocratic rule in practice.
Europe is in the midst of an experiment and it is unclear how it will end. One strain seeks to creating a supranational state similar to the United States and the other strain of Europeans is nationalistic. This is why you see the upsurge in things like instituting policies to increase indigenous European birth rates.
Yup. Powerful religious states belong to the ash heap of history. It is no coincidence that every advanced country in the world and rising, projected soon to be superpowers China and India are secular.
Islamism has failed everywhere it has been implemented, just as Communism failed (compared to its states goals). Yet these people still want to impose that failed system on the world!
I have never lived in Pakistan so why would I consider myself a Pakistani? I am not a Muslim out of choice. I live in a free country. Under shariah I would be executed as a “murtid”, simply because my parents happened to be Muslim.
You act as if I never had exposure to Islam. I was taken to the local mosque every week for 10+ years, know some hypocritical Islamists in my family. My uncle was the leader of the Jamaat Islami chapter at his college during the 80’s, several of my cousins are Islamists (one even wears a burka and moved to Saudi Arabia to live under shariah–at least she is not a hypocrite), and I listened to two Wahabbi imams and an Islamist from Egypt who probably was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood when he was in Egypt. All this hypocrites are voluntarily living in a “kuffar” country and they fantasize about replacing the Constitution with 9th century Arab/Roman law. I will fight the ideological war against them forever.
It doesn’t matter if you agree with him. The terrorists who attack the Pak army HQ, the terrorists who attacked the UN food office, the terrorists who blew up the bazaar in Peshawar, the terrorists who declared a “jihad” against China this week, etc. all believe in Mawdudi, Qutb, and co.
Did you read the post? This is a global threat. There are Islamists in Holland, the US and throughout the globe. Most of them are peaceful but some of them are jihadists. They all share the same goals although some seek to do it through peaceful means, such as outbreeding the “kuffar.” Few Muslims know what these fascists believe and the post is intended to help improve knowledge of this evil ideology.
Islamism is beyond Wahabbism. Wahabbism is only one wing of Islamism. There are other branches, i.e. Deobandism, Khomenism.
I never left; I was never a Muslim. I never voluntarily prayed, for instance.
I am not maligning Islam. I couldn’t care less about the doctrines of Islam or for that matter Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, etc. There is no such thing as “real Islam” or “true Christianity.” A religion can be interpreted a million different ways. What I am interested in is how fascist Islamists interpret Islam.
I would love to but fascists do not believe in open debate. There is a reason for this: they cannot win the war of ideas on merit.
Note that no one is refuting Mawdudi or Qutb’s words. This is what they believed and Islamists agreed with it. No one is pointing out what Mawdudi or Qutb “really believed” because the OP is an accurate reflection of their murderous ideology.