Re: Matter of supremacy
I think CJ has credibility problem b/c he also gave Mushy power to amend constitution as he wished. So, Parliament elected by the people can't change anything conflicting with basic structure of the Constitution, but military dictator can do whatever he like? Am I the only who finds flows in this argument?
Good point.
Re: Matter of supremacy
Theoretically, the parliament can amend those 3 clauses of the constitution. :P
And the judiciary can strike it down :p Wow you and I would do well in politics :D :p
Yeah...kakaballi in government and CM in opposition or in judiciary.
Re: Matter of supremacy
I think CJ has credibility problem b/c he also gave Mushy power to amend constitution as he wished. So, Parliament elected by the people can't change anything conflicting with basic structure of the Constitution, but military dictator can do whatever he like? Am I the only who finds flows in this argument?
Your points are valid but they are outdated. The superior judiciary has come a long way since then and that's water under the bridge now. Anyone who comes into power, must face a proactive judiciary and a vibrant media. I doubt any military adventurer will have a walkover now.
Re: Matter of supremacy
Zinda hai Zia zinda hai...................people would more than welcome Zia rather than these scum remnants of Bhutto who have driven the country in gutter.
bachay zia had already flushed the country in to gutter when he wiped the back of sam. These scum remanants of Bhutto and others are trying to get it out from the gutter.
Re: Matter of supremacy
LOL,
Zia’s son can’t even win a single National Assembly seat 
Re: Matter of supremacy
I think CJ has credibility problem b/c he also gave Mushy power to amend constitution as he wished. So, Parliament elected by the people can't change anything conflicting with basic structure of the Constitution, but military dictator can do whatever he like? Am I the only who finds flows in this argument?
Yes CJ has credibility problems, but fortunately or unfortunately everyone was behind this very same CJ when he took on the same dictator, no? So in that regards, all political parties who supported this CJ are idiots, now that same CJ is taking on them their a$$ is on fire.
CJ is talking like ex-dictator, mardood Zia-ul-Haq. He said, aaain koi aasmani sahifa nahin hay, iss ko toilet paper ki tarah istemaal kya ja sakta hay. And these very corrupt judges took oath under him and dictator who followed him. CJ is giving example of British parliament forgetting that judges don't take oath under pco there, flushing the constitution down to gutter.
Where did CJ say constitution is crap?