Re: Mary Magdalene
I reacted the way i did because i don’t take lightly to bull. I am annoyed at how easily the author has disrespected hazrat esa [jesus] :as:] in his book. For instance, doesn’t he call hazrat esa :as:] a sinner astagferullah. Doesn’t he claim that the closest way to god [Allah] isn’t through repentance BUT a sexual ritual. Clear blasphemy no? Big problem is how some people are actually believing the crap he has wrote.
How do i know what the real truth is you say. Well i know this much, the quran is more mighty then the ground d. brown stand on. Hazrat esa :as:] for 1 aren’t dead, they were raised to the heavens by allah but dan certainly doesn’t thinks so. Hazrat esa :as:] will marry after a second coming but according to dan mary was a lover of theirs’ blah blah blah…