Lodhis, Suris, Niazis, Marwats, Lohanis,Ghilzais,kharoti hotak are not pashtun

[Iconoclast]

Re: Lodhis, Suris, Niazis, Marwats, Lohanis,Ghilzais,kharoti hotak are not pashtun

@marwati

@the kaur you are right, lodha caste of hindus have nothing to do with lodhis who are related to ghilzais/khiljis. Lodhi of pashtuns is derived from pashto word loy-da which means the great one. There are also people in indonesia with surnames marwati, it doesnt mean they are related to my tribe. There are also hindu rajputs with surnames rohilla, it doesm mean rohillas of pashtuns are rajputs. @Mir Baloch is not aware of the word ethno-genesis. No nation can be racially and biologically pure, humans are not horses. If we start splitting hairs, A portion of arabs, the quresh, not trare ue arabs but descendents of hazrat ismael, tell this to any arab and you would look like an idiot.

Absolutely not, Quraish are considered Arabised Arabs bcoz they were descendants of Ismail wo was not Arab, pure arabs are Banu Jurham and its acknowledged in Arab writings of even today.

Arabs classify themselves into 3 groups

Arab Al Ariba: True arabs

Arab Al Mustariba: Arabised or assimilated like Quraish

Arab Al BAida: Lost tribes