I never said that Musharraf did corruption or money in his account are from looting … so do not say that I admitted that he did corruption.
I could not understand what is big deal about 2009? Obviously, Musharraf left Pakistan in 2009, so lectures would start after that. As for book’s revenue is concerned, that must be coming to him before 2009 and according to the Newsweek magazine, Musharraf must have earned millions of dollars from his book alone.
Report of Ansar Abbasi Kazzab the Liar is from late 2010, that means, if Liar has given correct figures than also it makes no difference, because by then Musharraf must have earned many millions of dollars from lectures alone.
As for corruption, I believe you did not read Newsweek article I posted (published after Musharraf resigned). In the article Newsweek claims that Musharraf was not corrupt and had no money from corruption. … so mark what I am saying … ‘NO CORRUPTION’ … and how sad it is that when one of the world most recognized and respected magazine believes that Musharraf was honest, some Pakistanis accuse Musharraf just to satisfy themselves or their political affiliation … Newsweek claim for me that Musharraf was not corrupt, is a big claim when one sees what western magazines claim about third world leaders, be they stooge of west or rebel of west, as almost all are reported to be corrupt.
With respect to Musharraf, world known magazine (Newsweek) is reporting that Musharraf was not corrupt and Pakistanis who are mostly corrupt and lie regularly, would like to label him corrupt just because they would like to see him as dirty as them. Is it not shameful? … Well, for me the saying in the (Newsweek) article that Musharraf was not corrupt is something to be proud, knowing that a mega corrupt country like Pakistan can produce someone who held highest post and was still not corrupt (rarity if we look at the tarnished history of corruption by most Pakistani past and present rulers … democrats or dictators).
I am putting down the article of Newsweek here again, as probably it is first time I have read in one of the most esteemed western magazine (3 most western esteemed magazines are Economist, Newsweek, and then Times) about a third world ruler (democrat, demon-crat, king or dictator) who is recognized and acclaimed that he was not corrupt. Read the (Newsweek Magazine) article again … think, and be proud that at least Pakistan produced someone who ruled Pakistan still has no stain of corruption attached to him (a rarity for a Pakistani ruler) 
Pakistan’s Musharraf: Lucrative Speaking Fees? - Newsweek
Pakistan’s Musharraf: Lucrative Speaking Fees?
By Newsweek Staff](http://www.newsweek.com/authors/newsweek-staff)
Filed: 8/23/08 at 1:00 AM* | Updated: 3/14/10 at 2:10 AM*
Filed Under: World
Former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who resigned from office this past Monday, rather than face a divisive impeachment trial in parliament, may be out of power. But he is not out of the money. When the 65-year-old former army chief finally leaves his British colonial-style residence inside Rawalpindi’s military garrison for an expected pilgrimage to Mecca in the next few days, he may continue traveling on a lucrative speaking tour through the Middle East, Europe and the U.S. Chicago-based Embark LLC is just one of the international public-relations firms trying to land Musharraf as a highly paid keynote speaker. Public-relations executives say the articulate and brash 44-year army veteran’s earning power could approach that of former U.S. President Bill Clinton, who famously snubbed him during a lightning visit to Islamabad eight years ago.
“The [speaking] fee for Musharraf would be in the $150,000-200,000 range for a day,” says Embark President David B. Wheeler, “plus jet and other V.I.P. arrangements on the ground.” Wheeler says Clinton, for whom Embark has arranged speaking engagements in the Middle East, commands up to $250,000 per appearance. “If we did multiple events in multiple cities, [Musharraf] could get closer to the $500,000 to $1,000,000 range [for a series of talks],” he said. Embark, which promises “unique experiences that educate, entertain and enlighten,” has also booked speeches for former U.S. President George H.W. Bush and former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell.
Pakistanis who know Musharraf well say this is good news for the former president,** who is not believed to have salted away a fortune as some of his predecessors have done** (Musharraf will only receive a modest army retirement pension). But he is a long way from the poor house. Workers are putting the finishing touches on a mansion, said to be worth some $2 million dollars, that he is building on five acres of prime land just outside Islamabad. Since his resignation he has been playing golf and tennis with friends, surrounded by heavy security, and is also planning to write a sequel to his successful 2006 autobiography, “In the Line of Fire,” which could easily net him another seven-figure windfall.
**Now let me explain you what the above article says:
**
**Tells clearly that Musharraf did not do any corruption (slated away a fortune) as what his predecessors (BB and NS) have done. …**and what is mentioned is not by a Pakistani newspapers that have no shame to defame honest person and lie as habit, but it is from American internationally recognized one of the world most respected magazine … ‘Newsweek’.
So .. now with no corruption money, what he can earn … here are the details:
It means, Musharraf earning of $150000 to $200000 a day (per lecture of few hours) **when he gives lecture **(remember, there are 365 days in a year). If that lecture is done on multiple events basis in multiple cities (or lecture is shown at various placecs same time) than Musharraf could earn $500,000 to $1 million a day (per lecture of few hours).
Apart of earning from lectures, what article says about Musahrraf book ‘The line of fire’?
**
It means Musharraf could easily net seven figure windfall from book … or figures in millions of dollars (7-figure windfall means … millions of dollars).**
Now for someone who could earn several hundred thousand dollars per lecture (few hours lecture in a day), why you think that if he has 23 million dollars … or even 230 million dollars (I am just multiplying what Ansar Abbasi claims, by 10) than it must be from corruption?
Obviously Musharraf do not need corruption to earn money. **His talent and speaking prowess is well respected across the world, especially in western and Arab countries, and he is in such demand that for him, earning huge amounts in no time is not a big deal.
Look at the video and think … what west recognise BeNazir, Zardari and Nawaz … as these type of leaders is our fate … Kings and Queens of Corrupts and characterless idiots.
**
That is why I am with Imran and TUQ … hoping that InshaAlalh they would succeed and would change Pakistan and give Pakistan an honest leadership. In above video, all 3 giant Thugs of corruption are mentioned … BB, Z and NS (NS at the end) … and that also at an occasion when people commemorate dead … still, how sad it is to see the way BB on her death was remembered in west … and worse thing is that some consider her as their’s heroine (Rani), without shame.