Let women fight WW3

And if I remember you volunteered to be Tom. Shoot away just as tom does. Meow!

Sure!

^ Mickey
Tom
Tom+Mickey

The amounts of sense you make is extraordinary, I give you that much. Now please, quit derailing posts I make with your ajeebness :grumpy:

It's a done deal.

^ Delete what you’ve written on my profile within the next 30 minutes. I never asked you to be nice. Its just I ain’t in the mood for a certain someone :mad:

I own up to all my derailed threads actually. On the contrary though, you won’t even move an inch or acknowledge the mistakes you continue to embarrassingly commit

So its Bozo, Airhead, Jerk

Any more names for you to come up with?

2 Likes

Okay, I'm sorry for being rude to you. :)

^ All good :k:

2 Likes

I think its safe to say that most have :@:

https:\/\/i.ibb.co\/wr6jLW8\/Feminists-Not-Objecting.png

2 Likes

So how much are the Macho Macho men benching right now? If it wasn’t for the wayyyyyyyyyyyy..overcompensating males, there wouldn’t be the war!

Women are more detail oriented, and have tendencies to form impaired, emotional judgements rather than intellectual ones [both science and Quran backs this up, btw]. Women typically rank higher than men in social and emotional intelligence, whereas men are not easily overcome by emotions and analyze with a bigger picture in mind. Men also have higher spatial and bodily-kinesthetic intelligences, both of which come handy in times of combat. In the event of a fire, I rather have a man lift me out of the building, rather than a woman dragging me down the staircase. Of course there are exceptions to this but I wouldn’t advocate for a majority-women army. Heck, I wouldn’t even vouch for half on half. I trust men with my safety, period. Many women drafted in military report being raped while on duty, while others choose to remain quiet.. So there’s that.

Girls are linguistically ahead -which is why you’ll always see a 3 year old girl communicating at the same level as a 5 year old boy and never vice versa. Boys’ jumping/running motor skills develop better and faster than girls. As adults, a majority of men are much better drivers and map-readers than women. Just different brain chemicals and arrangements. =]

Oh absolutely! There’s no denying that civilization and patriarchy favors men. However, my prior response is limited to military, and military only. To elaborate, women’s inherent inclination towards social and emotional intelligence gets them thriving and what better place to apply these skills than leadership positions you exemplified? Women are highly capable, except I just don’t think estrogen beats testosterone at war, predominantly because aggression is androgenic and females are not prone to being as aggressive as men with a ride-or-die mindset. Now, whether this is imposed by societal gender roles or genetics is debatable. Point being, yes there are plenty of physically fit, highly successful women globally, but their skillset isn’t necessarily aligned to physical aggression. In case of exceptions, the quantity of qualifying women is not sizeable enough to accommodate an entire team of army. Let’s look at video games for instance. How many women in your social circle would play violent videogames? Well, the battlefield is much worse.

My intention is not to fallaciously reduce one gender into incompetence as I sincerely believe women weren’t made to do what men can do, but rather made to do what men cannot do. In basic geometrical terms, both genders are synonymous to complementary angles, none being subsidiary to the other. As much as we’d like to progress and embrace equality in all fields, we cannot deny nature’s course that sets women and men inherently apart, not as a means for competition or subordination but rather as a form of symmetrical completion. Let each gender do, what they do best but allocate the freedom to navigate those differences. Admitting one gender does something better should not always equate to despondence for the other.

I feel we open a can of worms with that way of reasoning, the Nazis, misogynists, patriarchs etc all had used similar narratives, I am not saying you are going that route but this is one way of reasoning that we should stay away from. My daughters soccer coach was telling the girls to be not so aggressive and mentioned that girls in soccer were a lot more aggressive. With women empowerment and in my personal experience, in domestic situations also girls are very frequently getting aggressive and abusive. Can be witnessed on social media also where there are millions of videos of girls using violence and abuse on men.

My eldest just turned hip hop artist was abused very badly by his Pakistani background ex gf. I think that abuse matured him a lot and is reflective in his music. If u can handle extremely profane music u should give him a listen 780Mosochist he’s on Spotify. He doesn’t know that I know that he’s an artist. Hid it from me

I raised my kids with zero gender roles, boys cook n clean. Girl chops wood. My current lady carries a gun and I was surprised to see her take on a group of very large, loud and a abnoxious men at the top of her lungs. She said go big or go home.

2 Likes

Yup-like I said you are definitely an exception and not everyone raises their girls like boys. Times are changing but gender roles still have a long way to go. I personally love it when women take the lead in male dominated sectors, but I can’t advocate for an all female-military. Hopefully our topic/thread starter would have some input @Exoduss

^ Not too fond of rivers of texts actually, legit makes my mind go on a twirling spree for no reason. Allow me something short and I'll be happy to oblige

But yeah, look up women who've already sacrificed their lives for Ukraine. One is a former Miss world, another a pilot. 200 to 300 women supporting 1000 men ratio is what I'm understanding here, as negligible as it sounds it sure makes a whole load of a difference when it comes to defending your motherland

Thanks for your valuable feedback.

2 Likes

Matter of perspective, many see Ukraine as a fascist, racist, sellout regime who were facilitating the possible annihilation of the Russian people by courting NATO and their desire to install nuclear missiles on the border of Russia. Would be a shame if one died defending fascism. Like the suicide bomber who died in terrorist attack in Peshawar

^ To each their own helps in this case

What i see is the big fish trying to subdue the smaller fish country fraction of its size in attempts to appease, or as a matter of fact displease Ukraine's interests