Re: Lawyers’ continued struggle for democracy
DC, I understand your worries, but let me counter your argument by this article. Which might convince you of dictator’s rule is never the best option.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/world/asia/05pakistan.html?ref=world
Re: Lawyers' continued struggle for democracy
well If Mush is a monster, CJ is not the Saviour. So first thing first, "main na manoon group" should stop giving choices of Mush or CJ.
Yaar, baat wahi aajati hai. Aap kaha maan rahe hai that CJ is no better than Mush. Actually you have state many times that Musharraf is a sensible leader with more brains as any leader in past in Pak history. Now I tried to convince you that we facing worst case scenario in Pak aur aap abhi bhi naih maan rahe.
Re: Lawyers' continued struggle for democracy
They're struggling for more suicide bombings.
Re: Lawyers' continued struggle for democracy
^the way things have gone after CJs dismissal. I could hardly blame him or his fellows to be responsible for suiciders. You should ask AH and his company, maybe they have hired some of their recently visited madrassa friends.
Re: Lawyers' continued struggle for democracy
They're struggling for more suicide bombings.
yeah exactly
i am afraid what these pplz are doing
Re: Lawyers' continued struggle for democracy
CJ is worst coz in my eye , corrupt & thug Munsif (Judge) is worst than corrupt ruler and for heaven sake remove "hypothetically" form your post. This just shows that question was not asked in the best of spirit.
CJ was all thug. Want me to list some karnamey of his?
Gave power to Mush to amend constitution single handily (when Mush never asked for that power).
HE saw an opportunity, betrayed his own chief Justice and took oath on PCO. Exactly what Dogar has done now. (treason? If Mush and Dogar did, CJ did too)
Validated Mush's rule and helped him rule for 5 years without any objection (I wonder where constitution and principles were? )
He probably turned against Mush when Mush tried to use all of his "thug*ing*" evidences against him to sideline him (for whatever reason). In simple words "CJ ko hissa milna band ho gaya tha" I guess :)
Someone who forces corrupt officials to be held accountable and defends the poor is a thug in your eyes????
Govt propganda at its best. Its unfrotunate people like you are so easily fooled...
What other people who fought against oppression, and stood up for the rights of the poor do you consider to be thugs?
What evidence do you have by the way against the Chief Justice? Or are you so enamored of Mush that proof and evidence is no longer part of you vocabulary?
Re: Lawyers' continued struggle for democracy
well If Mush is a monster, CJ is not the Saviour. So first thing first, "main na manoon group" should stop giving choices of Mush or CJ.
We are asking for an INDEPEDANT Judiciary... Be it with the CJ or without.. But as things stand, you cant have an independant Judiciary without the CJ of Pakistan.
The CJ was a saviour for many people... His court was swamped by poor litigants trying to find justice in an otherwise uncaring and cold govt, particularly after he was rightfuly vindicated by the Supreme Court...
You may not like the CJ for whatever personal reasons you have, but Millions across the country have and continue to look on him as a savior.
Try convincing them otherwise.