Justice Department Opens Full Criminal Investigation on White House Leak (Merged)

Allowing criminals to work at the White House is unacceptable especially when national security is threatened…

Justice Dept. Starts Inquiry on Leak of C.I.A. Officer’s Identity
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: September 30, 2003

ASHINGTON (AP) – The Justice Department launched a full-blown criminal investigation into who leaked the name of a CIA officer, and President Bush directed his White House staff on Tuesday to cooperate fully.

The White House staff was notified of the investigation by e-mail after the Justice Department decided late Monday to move from a preliminary investigation into a full probe.

The White House staff was directed to preserve all materials that might be related to the investigation, said presidential spokesman Scott McClellan. Presumably that would include telephone logs, e-mails, notes and other documents.

“The president has directed the White House to cooperate fully with this investigation,” McClellan told reporters. “The president wants to get to the bottom of this.”

Senior staff members were told of the investigation at their morning staff meeting, and then White House counsel Alberto Gonzales sent an e-mail to all the staff notifying them of the probe.

Even before the Justice Department investigation was announced, Democrats were calling for the appointment of a special counsel to insure impartiality. McClellan said the decision rests with the Justice Department.

The department notified Gonzales about 8:30 p.m. Monday that it was launching an investigation but said he could wait until the next morning to notify staff and direct them to preserve relevant material, McClellan said.

The investigation stems from a CIA complaint two months ago that one of its agent’s identities had been disclosed. Justice gets about 50 such complaints from the CIA each year about the leak of classified information and very few of them ever get beyond a preliminary investigation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/30/national/30WIRE-JUST.html?hp

hmm the fat man in the middle east wasn't too pleased with Rove's announcing "no wars in 2004".. looks like someone will be punished for even suggesting that..

[QUOTE]
Allowing criminals to work at the White House is unacceptable especially when national security is threatened.................
[/QUOTE]

That take care of Cheney, Rumsfeld and some other neo-conservatives.

Is Lying to American public a crime?

Do you know a good plumber?

“Leaks of classified information are bad things.” No kiddin’!

“If there’s a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is.” Ofcourse, you do!

These nuggets are from none other than the US President. Lately the White House is plagued by leaks. They should look for a good plumber. I doubt if JohnAl KaydaAshcroft is the right candidate for this job.

Whats the hooplah about anyway? It was just a friggin’ CIA analyst. Who gives a hoot? Its all a horrible left wing conspiracy. :nook:

CNN

I thought you had a problem in your house Faisal bhai and were looking for plumbers in the bay area :smack:

Waisay I agree, we thought desion k pait halkay hotay haen, goray bhee kuch kamm naheen haen, in k pait mein bhee koi baat naheen rehti :smiley: plus now there’s so many females in the cabinet :smiley: khayr ham logon k lyay to achee hi baat hae aur hon secrets leak :dixsi:

This was posted in General Forum originally, not sure why, but I moved it here in any case.

Thats ok.. At this point, its more a tabloid stuff, than any serious political issue. Though with the so-called "liberal" media hell-bent to sharmindafying Bush, I am sure they will try their level-best to blow this into a full scale political storm. Till then... I am not going to spend serious political energy in analyzing the "leak" and "what it means".

Faisal, a law has been broken, why do you consider this matter to be "tabloid stuff"?

Isn't it at least a little funny that for so long (and still) their excuse for not providing crucial info was that it would reveal sources and methods??

"We know the precise location of Saddam's WMD!"
"Really? Where?"
"Uh.. it'd compromise our agents if I told you"

There's still how many pages of crap about KSA actually being involved in terror.. but they won't show it to us.

Etc, etc...

But they will blow the cover of a CIA agent, specializing in WMD no less, in order to shut up criticism?!?

The news article by Novak was published in July, in which he named a CIA operative. How come the storm started in late September for this thing? Something is not right. I guess one explanation is that no one actually reads Novak. :-)