Re: Jilted bride sues
The irony is so lost on you isn’t it?
Hilarious really.
Re: Jilted bride sues
The irony is so lost on you isn’t it?
Hilarious really.
Re: Jilted bride sues
Under common law, she is entitled to being compensated for having spent money in reliance of the promise made to her. Even in a written contract, one does not need to set out the consequence clause to obtain settlement or compensation for money spent based on a contract having been entered into - see the analogy provided above of the business man and chef. The guy did not need to say I'll pay you back if I don't marry you or have witnesses to such an agreement. The agreement that needs to be proven is the engagement - which no one is calling into question. The legal principle is called detrimental reliance. The courts cannot compel the guy to marry the girl, what they can do is undo the monetary damage caused as a result of the actions of the guy.
I quite like your answer. I also think you're a damn good lawyer :) To me, the case still smells of a jilted bride trying to get back at the fiance for being dumped but what do I know lol.
Re: Jilted bride sues
I quite like your answer. I also think you're a damn good lawyer :) To me, the case still smells of a jilted bride trying to get back at the fiance for being dumped but what do I know lol.
Thank you. I agree, she's definitely a jilted bride who feels like punishing the guy who dumped her - another woman (or man) might walk away, but she wants to get back at him however she can, and in this case it is financially. And like I've said before,
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!
Re: Jilted bride sues
wow I think what is obvious from this thread is that Diwana does not even understand the most basic of legal terms.
I said what I see and could not get anything which could prove me wrong. Even you did not have anything to say but this. :)
The result remains, the to be bride has to bring something substantial to prove her case to win. Which Sehrysh had problem with. :D
Re: Jilted bride sues
LOL! You are really thick aren’t ya! And comprehension isn’t your strong suit either ![]()
Nah, I don’t have a problem. Why waste time on people who don’t bring anything to the table - it’s better to ignore the ignorance and jayhaalat of others ![]()
Re: Jilted bride sues
Lets not go overboard. Be nice like I have been to you throughout this thread.
I answered you clearly for the questions you had in your post. ![]()
Re: Jilted bride sues
I said what I see and could not get anything which could prove me wrong. Even you did not have anything to say but this. :)
I guess your eyesight is not up to much either, I already gave my opinion, it's post number 16
Re: Jilted bride sues
No idea why people are so worked up here. My turn to use this ![]()
What I meant was instead of making that negative comment you could have discussed the specifics of any of my posts.
Agree with your post #16 by the way.
Is it full moon tonight or is it when nothing better to say, people get personal? Come on guys.
Learn to be civil.
These discussions are for everyone to learn not to get defensive or personal.
For Sehrysh: The beginning of losing an argument is when a lawyer (you are not even a lawyer yet) gets personal and silly. This statement will go long ways with you. Good luck.
People with some brain cells left are badly needed for me to discuss. ![]()
Re: Jilted bride sues
Re: Jilted bride sues
![]()
It doesnt make sense not to award her the money back.
She put up money under the promise that he would marry her and there would be a wedding.
No wedding.
Money back.
Re: Jilted bride sues
In an ideal world that is true. He needs to take up the responsibilty and be nice. Even if he is not legally bound.
Re: Jilted bride sues
Dominique Buttitta
is that a real last name or just an emphatic of her body parts
Re: Jilted bride sues
Oh TLK, I’m impressed at how you’ve managed to get at the essence of the issue, LOL! BTW, Happy New Year!
Re: Jilted bride sues
lol. Get ready to get sued now… She is a lawyer ya know. ![]()
Re: Jilted bride sues
In an ideal world that is true. He needs to take up the responsibilty and be nice. Even if he is not legally bound.
Being legally bound to something is just one verdict away from it happening. The fact that cases like this have won in the past makes is also in her favor.
I dont see it being too difficult for her to win. She has enough proof and testimonies.
Re: Jilted bride sues
Being legally bound to something is just one verdict away from it happening. The fact that cases like this have won in the past makes is also in her favor.
I dont see it being too difficult for her to win. She has enough proof and testimonies.
Maybe you know more than me. And not questioning your information for the sake of questioning it but do you have examples of cases LIKE this?
Everyone so far has said she is not gonna be able to win as much as I could read or understand and she is just being a vengeful lawyer. I still could be wrong.
Re: Jilted bride sues
I am sorry you have disappointed me. ![]()
OK, may be I can discuss with you some other time and make you again all flustered. ![]()
Re: Jilted bride sues
Its the small details that make all the difference in world.
![]()