Jilted bride sues

[diwana]

Re: Jilted bride sues

@Sehrysh

The LEGAL SYSTEM is called common law, as opposed to civil law. I have never said that the couple was in a “common-law relationship” - that is entirely different.

As for the website you’ve quoted - the people commenting are not legal experts, much like yourself, I assume, and therefore cannot comment with any expertise or knowledge on whether there is a basis or precedent in law for the bride to recover the money spent on the engagement.

You acknowledged earlier that you had not read the original article and it may have escaped your attention that the jilted fiance is a lawyer and she has three additional lawyers who believe that she has a meritorious claim. I could cite Illinois law to support the fact that she does have a right to sue, but it would be wasted on you

Points to be noted.

In this post you have not brought ANYTHING for supporting her claim.

You talked about common law, I gave you answer for that. our words here:

“Under common law, she is entitled to being compensated for having spent money in reliance of the promise made to her.”

You have not brought ANYTHING to counter my posts #29 and #31.

The link I placed was to show, it is acknowledged by many that court cannot help in many cases.

And to your last part of post, I did read the article and know she is a lawyer.

Does not make it automatically that she would win.

Moreover, right to sue was never an issue.

No need to cite Illinois Law. Everyone in US has right to sue anyone for any reason. Does not mean the court will judge in the favor of plaintiff.

Some cases are thrown out and the plaintiff gets penalty for misusing the right and wasting time of the court. (As a student of law you should know the term- frivolous lawsuit)

( Earlier in another thread I proved you that warrants issued does not mean the person is criminal, remember?)

P.S. I love when you keep smacking your head but do not bring anything substantial to refute/counter me.