Jafri, explain your words more clearly plz

i m unable to understand that y ppl link karbala tragedy wid the relegion ........ it was a political event. and not of the first and last of its nature, in the history of islam. like jang e jamal and siffin before it and hazrat ibn zubair death after the event of karbala.

everybody remember karbala but nobody talked about ibn zubair who also rose against banu ummayad. agar banu ummayad kay khilaf khara hona itna bar kaam tha tu yeh tu unhoon nay bhi kiya. and made a much organised and ppl supported effort to overthrow banu ummayyad than hazrat hussain khurooj that was not organised, well planed and very few ppl of his home town supported him. but nobody specially shia consider ibn zubair as a hero.

may be karbala incident have some impact on shia's but on it has no such impact on the islam. its part of the history but not part of the relegion.

the battle really mattered in the history of islam is badr, uhaud, ahzabb, muta, yamama, qadsia, hazrat muavia expedition for cyprus, yazid attack on instunbol ............ etc and many others ..................... its irony we dont talk about them much as compare to karbala.

majority of abu mukhnif fabrications ............ other wise yazid and down the line caliph of banu ummayad did not make halal as haram or vice versa. they did ijtihad as they were caliphs and amir ul momin , where need arose.

majority of the islamic world conquered during the period of ummayad dynasty still we think they were pervert, coward and incompetent.

they were far better ppl than us and really served islam.