Israel trains US assassination squads in Iraq

Israel trains US assassination squads in Iraq

Julian Borger in Washington
Tuesday December 9, 2003
The Guardian

Israeli advisers are helping train US special forces in aggressive
counter-insurgency operations in Iraq, including the use of
assassination squads against guerrilla leaders, US intelligence and
military sources said yesterday.

The Israeli Defence Force (IDF) has sent urban warfare specialists to
Fort Bragg in North Carolina, the home of US special forces, and
according to two sources, Israeli military “consultants” have also
visited Iraq.

US forces in Iraq’s Sunni triangle have already begun to use tactics
that echo Israeli operations in the occupied territories, sealing off
centres of resistance with razor wire and razing buildings from where
attacks have been launched against US troops.

But the secret war in Iraq is about to get much tougher, in the hope of
suppressing the Ba’athist-led insurgency ahead of next November’s
presidential elections.

US special forces teams are already behind the lines inside Syria
attempting to kill foreign jihadists before they cross the border, and
a group focused on the “neutralisation” of guerrilla leaders is being
set up, according to sources familiar with the operations.

“This is basically an assassination programme. That is what is being
conceptualised here. This is a hunter-killer team,” said a former
senior US intelligence official, who added that he feared the new
tactics and enhanced cooperation with Israel would only inflame a
volatile situation in the Middle East.

“It is bonkers, insane. Here we are - we’re already being compared to
Sharon in the Arab world, and we’ve just confirmed it by bringing in
the Israelis and setting up assassination teams.”

“They are being trained by Israelis in Fort Bragg,” a well-informed
intelligence source in Washington said.

“Some Israelis went to Iraq as well, not to do training, but for
providing consultations.”

The consultants’ visit to Iraq was confirmed by another US source who
was in contact with American officials there.

The Pentagon did not return calls seeking comment, but a military
planner, Brigadier General Michael Vane, mentioned the cooperation with
Israel in a letter to Army magazine in July about the Iraq
counter-insurgency campaign.

“We recently travelled to Israel to glean lessons learned from their
counterterrorist operations in urban areas,” wrote General Vane, deputy
chief of staff at the army’s training and doctrine command.

An Israeli official said the IDF regularly shared its experience in the
West Bank and Gaza with the US armed forces, but said he could not
comment about cooperation in Iraq.

“When we do activities, the US military attaches in Tel Aviv are
interested. I assume it’s the same as the British. That’s the way
allies work. The special forces come to our people and say, do debrief
on an operation we have done,” the official said.

“Does it affect Iraq? It’s not in our interest or the American interest
or in anyone’s interest to go into that. It would just fit in with
jihadist prejudices.”

Colonel Ralph Peters, a former army intelligence officer and a critic
of Pentagon policy in Iraq, said yesterday there was nothing wrong with
learning lessons wherever possible.

“When we turn to anyone for insights, it doesn’t mean we blindly accept
it,” Col Peters said. “But I think what you’re seeing is a new realism.
The American tendency is to try to win all the hearts and minds. In
Iraq, there are just some hearts and minds you can’t win. Within the
bounds of human rights, if you do make an example of certain villages
it gets the attention of the others, and attacks have gone down in the
area.”

The new counter-insurgency unit made up of elite troops being put
together in the Pentagon is called Task Force 121, New Yorker magazine
reported in yesterday’s edition.

One of the planners behind the offensive is a highly controversial
figure, whose role is likely to inflame Muslim opinion: Lieutenant
General William “Jerry” Boykin.

In October, there were calls for his resignation after he told a church
congregation in Oregon that the US was at war with Satan, who “wants to
destroy us as a Christian army”.

“He’s been promoted a rank above his abilities,” he said. “Some
generals are pretty good on battlefield but are disastrous nearer the
source of power.”

Comment:

Surprise surprise! America and Israel brothers in arms. Some of the statements by the Americans explain their policies in Iraq such as destroying villages to teach the enemy a lesson, seems not much has changed from the time they were in vietnam. Also isn’t pursuing and killing muslim soldiers inside Syria a violation of their own international law?

Sounds good, better than bombing entire buildings that could threaten the safety of others. Those who are trying to disrupt the reconstruction of Iraq must be dealt with swiftly as the safety and lives (Iraqi and American) depend on it.

one terrorist seeking help from another. :nook:

Love the article. All this inflamatory rhetoric and not a single named source. And if Muslims were not inflamed enough, let's throw in a mention of Boynkin to really get the Muslim blood boiling.

I guess he held back by not letting some mention of the Nazi's and Hiroshima creep in... No wonder the Guardian has such a large Muslim following.

I'm wih UTD, anything that prevents US and civilian deaths I am all for. I had heard a rumor that the Israeli's had developed a Radio Frequency broadcaster that was powerful enough to mount on a truck bumper, and would set off roadside explosives well before the truck is near. Now that might help!

"US special forces teams are already behind the lines inside Syria
attempting to kill foreign jihadists before they cross the border, and
a group focused on the "neutralisation" of guerrilla leaders is being
set up, according to sources familiar with the operations.

"This is basically an assassination programme. That is what is being
conceptualised here. This is a hunter-killer team,"

That's good stuff.

Since everyone knows that Syria does not harbor foreign jihadists trying to join the fray in Iraq, there won’t be any assassinations and everyone should be pretty happy about this news. We’ll just be further dispersing our special forces guys to places where they won’t be doing anything but running around in the desert.

If, on the other hand, there really are a few jihadists that are quietly taken out in transit, this too should be supported by most people. Getting them before they can jeopardize the lives of more Iraqi civilians by putting them in the line of fire sounds like a good idea. :k:

That's a helluva title... don't think I need to read the article to see where this goes.

I have no problem with assasinations, as long as we know who we're hitting and don't take out two blocks doing it.