So what is the point of bringing this second article? Does this prove anyone is trying to fool from Pakistsn side?
By providing this second link you are admitting that you were **dead wrong **in starting this thread on misconception that anyone was trying to fool from Pakistan side.
Remember, that was the article you posted to try to fool readers and failed miserably.
If you were right, then talk about the same article and prove your point of thread.
Now, you searched another article to put a spin to the argument and again trying to fool readers.
Your first assertion of someone **was trying to fool **is ‘killed’ on the spot.
Hence your thread is pointless.
Even though there is absolutely no need to fall for your trap, I must say you have tried to twist the issue of someone trying to fool someone.
**Again the first article was very realistic and so is the second one. **
You cannot find anything which can confirm your ludicrous remark of anyone from Pakistan was trying to fool anyone.
Read below excerpt from the same article you posted the link to get more insight…wish you sweet deep night sleep!
“The question what exactly transpired at the Paris talks will probably never be fully clarified. But it seems that Sarkozy went beyond the brief prepared for him by his officials. Nevertheless, his remark that** Pakistan has as much claim to nuclear technology as India is significant**** because it is an acknowledgment that a policy of discriminating between the two countries is irrational and illogical and would be difficult to sustain in the long run. Even Indian foreign ministerPranab Mukherjeeadmitted in an unguarded moment at a press conference in Washington on Oct 10 thatevery country had the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes,and said that **India would like to encourage civil nuclear cooperation between Pakistan and the US.**”
**
Did Mukherjee really mean this or even made these remaks is questionable and not known but are very welcoming if true.
Please never try to fool readers again.