Indian mag predicts war along LoC

[Babuji]

Re: Indian mag predicts war along LoC

@wunderkind

Musharraf is planning to launch a mini-war in the Kashmir, along Kargil lines. There was an article in an Indian daily recently in which the author (who is very close to RAW) wrote that Musharraf had ordered many reserve units to concentrate along the Gulmarg salient of the LOC.

It is expected that there will be an Indian strike into Azad Kashmir and Pakistan will retaliate with full force, and it will be supported by Kashmiri militants in the valley.

I hope Musharraf is not so stupid :halo:

[Babuji]

Re: Indian mag predicts war along LoC

@roadrunner

hmm..The reality of the situations escapes you ...

Your stereotypical assumptions just reflect your ignorance & stupidity.

@roadrunner

In '71 India only beat Pakistan when half the Army and all the airforce in the Eastern sector deserted (PAF pilots had to maintain the Western sector also). Faced with a half strength Army and no airforce, the Indian Army needed another million Mukti Bahini as well as half a million of its own troops to defeat around 40,000 Pakistani troops. In all the other wars, India did not win, but Pakistan had the advantage.

Bottomline is that India won in '71 & Pak was split into two.

If you call the other 3 wars as advantage for Pak, I get hysterical thinking about what a Pak loss/disadvantage would look like :D

[Hahahaha]

Re: Indian mag predicts war along LoC

@rambo143

Have u ever seen the Indian Map, ofcourse not. Where is Hydrabad, do u have any idea or just talking what ur Madarsa taught u???

Hydrabad is in center of South India, and on this earth u cant find a country within country. Crap and funny thought by Pak.

After you mentioned the madarsa and all that.. I dont think I have to waste my time on a close minded idiot like you.
As for your info. I do know exactly where Hydrabad is. For your infomation Pakistan was the first country to be formed on the basis of religion. If there were people like you on the Indian side back then who demanded similar examples ..maybe Pakistan would have never been created.
I agree it would have been only hard for pakistan to govern Hydrabad in the middle of India. But that was not the issue being discussed. You might wana go back and read the whole thread before blindly start posting. The number of posts u have doesnt impress me least bit infact it makes me laugh!:D

[Hahahaha]

Re: Indian mag predicts war along LoC

@Babuji

Can you provide a basis for that claim ? A link would help

http://www.bartleby.com/65/pa/Pakistan.html
Read Paragraph 18. I will try and find better sources.

“Disputes between India and Pakistan arose also over the princely states of Junagadh, Hyderabad, and Kashmir. In the first two, Muslim rulers held sway over a Hindu majority but India forcibly joined both states to the Union, dismissing the wishes of the rulers and basing its claims instead on the wishes of the people and the facts of geography. In Kashmir the situation was precisely the opposite; a Hindu ruler held sway over a Muslim majority in a country that was geographically and economically tied to West Pakistan. The ruler signed over Kashmir to India in Oct., 1947, but Pakistan refused to accept the move. Fighting broke out (see India-Pakistan Wars) and continued until Jan., 1948, when India and Pakistan both appealed to the United Nations, each accusing the other of aggression. A cease-fire was agreed upon and a temporary demarcation line partitioned (1949) the disputed state”

[Babuji]

Re: Indian mag predicts war along LoC

@Hahahaha

Homework Help and Textbook Solutions | bartleby
Read Paragraph 18. I will try and find better sources.

“Disputes between India and Pakistan arose also over the princely states of Junagadh, Hyderabad, and Kashmir. In the first two, Muslim rulers held sway over a Hindu majority but India forcibly joined both states to the Union, dismissing the wishes of the rulers and basing its claims instead on the wishes of the people and the facts of geography. In Kashmir the situation was precisely the opposite; a Hindu ruler held sway over a Muslim majority in a country that was geographically and economically tied to West Pakistan. The ruler signed over Kashmir to India in Oct., 1947, but Pakistan refused to accept the move. Fighting broke out (see India-Pakistan Wars) and continued until Jan., 1948, when India and Pakistan both appealed to the United Nations, each accusing the other of aggression. A cease-fire was agreed upon and a temporary demarcation line partitioned (1949) the disputed state”

The above could be true, however it is obvious why India did not want a Pakistani state in the middle of India - both Junagadh & Hyderabad would have been landlocked by India. Kashmir was the only state where both countries could have laid claim since its on the border.

[rambo143]

Re: Indian mag predicts war along LoC

@Hahahaha

After you mentioned the madarsa and all that.. I dont think I have to waste my time on a close minded idiot like you.
As for your info. I do know exactly where Hydrabad is. For your infomation Pakistan was the first country to be formed on the basis of religion. If there were people like you on the Indian side back then who demanded similar examples ..maybe Pakistan would have never been created.
I agree it would have been only hard for pakistan to govern Hydrabad in the middle of India. But that was not the issue being discussed. You might wana go back and read the whole thread before blindly start posting. The number of posts u have doesnt impress me least bit infact it makes me laugh!

Ok, ur Madarsas are Cambridge Universty, happy???
If ur not impressed frm my posts then its ok, Your Problem.
I think u brought Hydrabad first in this topic. And if Pak would have been ruling on Hydrabad then India **** u daily.