Oh.... I got your point now. So basically we are talking about the IF. Like If Windies and Saffies had not beaten India in that WC, India could have been the champ there. If Srilanka had not beaten India in 1996 semi final, India could have won that WC as well. And if ponting had not scored a century in WC 2003 final, India could have taken that Cup as well. Like bat was infront of the ball otherwise it was a certain clean bowled.
Sorry yar zara dair may baat samjh aiieee. Pehlay bool daitay:D
Dude,
you started if and but... Some1 just said Pakistan managed to win that worldcup because of rain. And he is right..you brought in all the IFs and BUTs that Pak would have improved run rate and forgot to mention the run-rate deficit from that washed out game. :D
Dude,
you started if and but... Some1 just said Pakistan managed to win that worldcup because of rain. And he is right..you brought in all the IFs and BUTs that Pak would have improved run rate and forgot to mention the run-rate deficit from that washed out game. :D
unkil first of all why would I start talking about a 15 years old pool match of 1992 WC in a England Indian 2007 test matchthread ??? My name is not Some 1.
And as far as talking about IF goes, go through the thread again. You might find this, which would tell you who started ifs and buts
Would Pakistan have won the World Cup **if **it had not rained after they were bowled out for 75 by England ?
The answer is NO and I rest my case.
At times you guys are so sensible posters but then sometimes you guys just act like little babies.
Yar Some1 kee muhabat may itnay bhee andhay na ho joa...:D
So what are you offering if India managed to draw the series. How about keeping your mouth shut for few months at KK. I bet you dont have guts to offer that.
And what if India lose? Will you shutup for ever? I bet you can't do that....kyooN kay teray andar bohat bara keera hai :)
And no I will not shut my mouth and yes I don't have the guts to offer you that.