Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
^ :smack:
You can download Don Quixote from project Gutenberg in whatever ebook format you’d like. But please do read it asap.
I just finished telling you that you are trying to play football in a swimming pool and you respond with “I can prove there is water in the pool”
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
OK, this retarded person did not realize that humiliation was the objective as opposed to dissemination of information. Sorry, my bad.
I have pasted the relevant portions:
“MilitaryIn the wake of Operation Neptune’s Spear there were calls for similar strikes conducted by India against Hafeez Saeed and Dawood Ibrahim,[SUP][59]](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/#cite_note-58)[/SUP][SUP][60]](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/#cite_note-59)[/SUP][SUP][61]](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/#cite_note-tribune1-60)[/SUP] with Indian Army Chief General V K Singh telling reporters, “I would like to say only this that if such a chance comes, then all the three arms (of the Indian Defense Forces) are competent to do this”. Indian Air Chief Marshal P V Naik said that India has the capability to carry out such surgical strikes against terrorists.[SUP][62]](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/#cite_note-61)[/SUP]
Following the death of bin Laden in Pakistan, the Border Security Force of India was put on high alert along India’s 553 km border with Pakistan, in Punjab.[SUP][63]](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/#cite_note-62)[/SUP] However, a former Pakistani Air Force commander dismissed this as the rhetoric of “paper tigers”, and Indian Minister for Home Affairs P. Chidambaram cautioned that India might be unable to carry out such an attack because, “We don’t have our forces on Pakistani soil. We are not invited there. We don’t have any support from Pakistan.”[SUP][61]](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/#cite_note-tribune1-60)”
[/SUP]I did not read this as a threat - rather as an expression of India’s capability. There is a difference. Chidambaram brushed aside this thought. So your point is?
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
^ you really have to attempt coherence.
1st you say you dont care. then you divine and expose the secret that Paklinks is a Pak forum and actually redefine world affairs to mean 'when, where and if Pak sovereignty is threatened' then, thus having created your own windmill, now you want to prove that India has so threatened in the past!
When Don Quixote tilts at windmills it is funny and charming - there was atleast a windmill When Donkeyxotes tilt at imaginary windmills, the rider and the mule become indistinguishable.
tilt away and enjoy!
You still did not answer CM's basic question.
If he proves that your serving military general has threatened to violate our sovereignty, will you eat your words and ban yourself for a week?
Because THAT threat would not merely remain an internal affair of India.
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
This coming from a man who won't even believe when his own Military officials threaten Pakistan.
Oh bhai, why are you wasting time... You can provide all the sources in the world he is still going to deny, Living in full denial is the hall mark of Indians. Save the bandwidth please.....
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
^^ Sadly, this is true! Indians have buried their heads deep in the sand and do not want to see the reality as it is.
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
You still did not answer CM's basic question.
If he proves that your serving military general has threatened to violate our sovereignty, will you eat your words and ban yourself for a week?
Because THAT threat would not merely remain an internal affair of India.
obviously you have not read anything wrote. CM invented his own battle, imagined his own challenge and posed a question to me based on that imagination. Hence I have referred him to read read up on Don Quixote. If you think I should still take up that meaningless and irrelevant challenge, first explain to me why, then we'll see
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
yawn You two are right. This is waste of bandwidth.
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
obviously you have not read anything wrote. CM invented his own battle, imagined his own challenge and posed a question to me based on that imagination. Hence I have referred him to read read up on Don Quixote. If you think I should still take up that meaningless and irrelevant challenge, first explain to me why, then we'll see
it is :Dvery hard to teach madarsa graduates !
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
I believe CM's question has been answered is post #22. Looks like Minister Saab has his head buried in ....
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
Nothing was answered in 22. If you recall when there were rumors that Israel may potentially attack Iran, what did Iran do? It took it as a threat. When the enemy nation states they have intentions to carry out such attacks or have the ability to do so and will do so if needed that is a direct threat.
Regardless how you wish to spin it even the Indian media considered it a threat of incursion.
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
^ I agree that it was a semi-threat - that India is capable of it per the military leader. however, Chidambaran dismissed the idea. Does that make any difference to you?
Bottom line for me is, as a person living abroad, it is more imprtant for me to choose my words carefully and not inflame the situation in that region. So I prefer to see glass as half full. To me, a life lost is a life lost, whether it is east of the border or the west.
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
Nothing was answered in 22. If you recall when there were rumors that Israel may potentially attack Iran, what did Iran do? It took it as a threat. When the enemy nation states they have intentions to carry out such attacks or have the ability to do so and will do so if needed that is a direct threat.
Regardless how you wish to spin it even the Indian media considered it a threat of incursion.
haha you still trying to reason with retards.... LMAO..... gooooooooooooooooood luck :D
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
^ The language a person uses reflects on him/her
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
What a mistake. Now there will be a trade war between India and Australia. No more Fosters in India.
Re: India rejects trilateral security pact with Australia, US..
Hasn't Fosters been bought by some non=Aussie company anyway?