Re: India has hard choices on US nuclear deal: Rice
did Pakistan have a vote re referring Iran to Security council? How did the decide?
Re: India has hard choices on US nuclear deal: Rice
No, it is not a member of IAEA board for this year. It was for the last year, and it abstained, while India voted against Iran, just like it has now.
Re: India has hard choices on US nuclear deal: Rice
hm! so who's the wimp here?
Re: India has hard choices on US nuclear deal: Rice
Snags Surface in India-US Nuclear Deal
Re: India has hard choices on US nuclear deal: Rice
Your jaded sense of history and real politics aside, this has more to do with the Indian need for reliable energy than anything else.
India is not idiotic enough to take a venture with Pakistan and build a pipeline that no one is willing to finance or insure. Even Pakistan's "all weather" friend China is unwilling to become a party to the deal. Pakistan is in no position to guarantee the safe transfer of natural gas to India. The more Indians study the idea, the less it becomes palpable.
To add to this, India has to weigh in on possible sanctions that will come the way of Iran, disrupting service, the instability of Pakistan, and dependence on a single source for energy. Not to mention continued voilence and unrest in the region.
The US on the other hand is offering nuclear power facilities and know how that will be immune to the general unstabilizing forces in the region. Iran is in need of foreign exchange, regardless of how India votes, Iran will not turn down one of it's biggest source for money.
Re: India has hard choices on US nuclear deal: Rice
India-US nuclear deal runs into troubled waters
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - A landmark nuclear cooperation deal between India and the United States has run into serious trouble, with Washington playing hard ball and India’s atomic energy establishment raising objections to the terms of the deal. Now Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has a tough choice to make — override his own scientific establishment or suffer a serious loss of face when President George W. Bush visits his country in early March. “The government is debating this very seriously,” said foreign policy expert C. Raja Mohan. “Some big decisions have to be taken.” The deal, agreed in principle when Singh visited Washington last July, would offer India access to nuclear technology and reactors — at a stroke removing much of the stigma India attracted when it conducted nuclear tests in 1974 and 1998. In return, New Delhi offered to separate its civilian and military nuclear programs — and place the civilian part under international supervision. But that is where the deal could come unstuck. The U.S. administration, under pressure from a hesitant Congress, wants to see more of India’s program under international supervision than New Delhi is offering. At the heart of the debate is a prototype Fast Breeder program, which would process plutonium from spent fuel from India’s existing Heavy Water reactors. The chief of India’s Department of Atomic Energy Anil Kakodkar went public with his objections in a newspaper interview published in full on Wednesday. Placing the Fast Breeder under international supervision would “shackle” his scientists and leave the country dependent on imported uranium, he said. “Both from the point of view of maintaining long-term energy security and for maintaining the ‘minimum credible deterrent’, the Fast Breeder program just cannot be put on the civilian list,” he said. “This is not in our strategic interest.”
TURF BATTLE
Nonsense say the deal’s supporters. DAE, long a secretive and isolationist organization, is simply scared of opening up, ignoring long-term strategic goals for its own narrow interests. “There is a very strong turf battle going on,” said Dr Harsh V. Pant, a lecturer in defense studies at King’s College, London. “The scientific establishment wants to defend its turf.” Singh, already under fire from his Communist allies over the deal, has promised to address parliament later this month about the deal. Promising to defend India’s national interest, he vowed there was “no question of bending” to American demands. U.S. officials are hoping to reach a deal before Bush’s visit. But in a January 26 interview with Reuters, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice said India had to make some “difficult choices.” In New Delhi, the foreign ministry is keen to push the deal through, but says Washington is a playing tough. “It’s coming down to hard-nosed political bargaining,” said one official. India’s civilian and military nuclear programs are completely entwined. New Delhi had proposed a phased separation, Washington wants it done in one go, he said. “That is, of course, not impossible but it will take us time and preparation if we agree to do it. And we only have three weeks before the Bush visit — that may not be sufficient.”