Its a matter of personal choice.....He statged a protest when gov asked them not to..... you go against gov you pay the price.
Yep, so true, we shouldn't blame kings of past as well as Saddam for killing people who were threat or citicizers to their "government".
Its a matter of personal choice.....He statged a protest when gov asked them not to..... you go against gov you pay the price.He is on a hunger strike.... Who cares....marney do ...he'll die for nothing....He should learn thatrespect and you'll be respected.
Respect musharraf? I guess then it is better to die.
Its a matter of personal choice.....He statged a protest when gov asked them not to..... you go against gov you pay the price.He is on a hunger strike.... Who cares....marney do ...he'll die for nothing....He should learn thatrespect and you'll be respected.
its not a matter of personal choice. its a matter of national interests.
so you mean that all of us who're against mush, should be arrested because we are against his policies. what kind of logic is that. Then why do we blame saddam hussain for all the killings.
hunger strike is a way to protest.
and why do we let him die - the person who has done so much for PK.
we all chose to leave PK for our personal betterment. But we should always admire those who could lead the best life overseas but they chose to live in PK. and they're doing so much.
Yep, so true, we shouldn't blame kings of past as well as Saddam for killing people who were threat or citicizers to their "government".
I dont give a rats a* about saddam but Since you have mentioned saddam let me brush your memory..There is a big difference going against gov and consipiring a murder against the head of state......Hey he killed people who wanted him dead.....And he was a true dictator.Did musharaf started a genocide against his own ppl when he was targeted for an assisnation????* Now coming back to your post..... i say if its a matter of national security then its only the gov who can protect the country and its people and for that purpose if gov has to get rid of elements who are a threat to national security ,then anything is fair.
Respect musharraf? I guess then it is better to die.
I dont give a rats a* about saddam but Since you have mentioned saddam let me brush your memory..There is a big difference going against gov and consipiring a murder against the head of state......Hey he killed people who wanted him dead.....And he was a true dictator.Did musharaf started a genocide against his own when he was targeted for an assisnation????*
Lets go deeper in history then... when did Saddam turn into "real" monster after coming into power (how many years)?
[quote] Now coming back to your post..... i say if its a matter of national security then its only the gov who can protect the country and its people and for that purpose if gov has to get rid of elements who are a threat to national security ,then anything is fair.
[/quote]
And its Musharraf who decides whats national security and whats not...
Lets go deeper in history then... when did Saddam turn into "real" monster after coming into power (how many years)?
Like i already said i dont care what he did and to hell with saddam and iraq and all the problem created arab region..... My concern is my country period. You and i both know this its completely unfair to compare Musharaf with saddam .....
And its Musharraf who decides whats national security and whats not...
And who is the head of army and who happens to be the head of state..... am i missing anything?
Lets go deeper in history then... when did Saddam turn into "real" monster after coming into power (how many years)?
Like i already said i dont care what he did and to hell with saddam and iraq and all the problem created arab region..... My concern is my country period. You and i both know this its completely unfair to compare Musharaf with saddam .....
[/quote]
The point is that with dictators you never know what happens next, though Mushy may not turnout to be 100% Saddam but he seems to be on his way.
[quote] And who is the head of army and who happens to be the head of state.....
[/quote]
[quote]
am i missing anything?
[/quote]
What you are missing is national trust.
The point is that with dictators you never know what happens next, though Mushy may not turnout to be 100% Saddam but he seems to be on his way..
True but there is no harm in hoping for the best and helping out and supporting a leader in time of crises.
What you are missing is national trust.
That'll come when ppl will stop listening to opposition leader who in reality are enemy of the state,they are the one who wants the big pie.Do they really care about our ppl......guess not.
That'll come when ppl will stop listening to opposition leader who in reality are enemy of the state,they are the one who wants the big pie.Do they really care about our ppl......guess not.
I don't know who is enemy of state, the one who allies with criminals/terrorists or the one who does the same.
Is Imran Khan still on hunger strike? I have not heard the latest news on this. I hope his sehat is ok.
He was also sitting close to Qazi Hussain today, whose party gave him a thrashing at Punjab University, so surely he is not of right mind at the moment?