Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Exactly!
Who told him to bat 2nd?
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Pak 131-5
I guess match is officially over!!!
I’ve little confession to make!
If Pakistan loose today ( business as usual, nothing out of the blue), i’d win a iftar buffet at Chocolate room !!!
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
From 92/1 to 132/5
Dismal batting again
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Pakistan have yet to score 200 in this tournament!!!
And nothing new!!! With Kinds of Hafeez in team these things are bound of happen…
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
136/6
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
A team struggles to score 200 while chasing 237…does not deserve to play Semi final nor should be a automatic selection for world cup
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
157/6
And this too despite being given a solid start by Fakhar
Faheem needs to control his aggression and bat sensibly
RRR is still only 3.63
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
pathetic so far…we only needed 236 and we were 74 for none in 11 overs and look where we are.
and even if we win, so what…it is the same story. we cannot chase anything above 150. batting is beyond pathetic. Babar our so called super star, unfortunately, is failing in every match.
we are missing umar akmal in the middle but he is an idiot
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Never seen this before…
Both teams trying to loose
Lets see who wins the battle to loose the match
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Not watching it. So that we win
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Sri Lanka 236 (49.2 ov)
Pakistan 233/7 (44.4 ov)
Pakistan require another 4 runs with 3 wickets and 32 balls remaining
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Done. We won!!
Sri Lanka 236 (49.2 ov)
Pakistan 237/7 (44.5 ov)
Match over
44.5
Malinga to Sarfraz Ahmed, FOUR, he’s done it! Sarfraz Ahmed has huffed and puffed and pushed and fought - and he hasn’t done it perfectly - but he has dragged his team into the semi-final.
44.4
Malinga to Sarfraz Ahmed, 2 runs, slower ball, low full toss at knee height, calmly tucked to bisect deep square and fine leg
44.3
Malinga to Sarfraz Ahmed, 2 runs, slower yorker, met on the full, flicked to deep square’s right and back for the second
44.2
Malinga to Mohammad Amir, 1 run, back of a length at off stump, gets on top of the bounce, opens the face to drop this to point’s right
Forlorn, stretching his hamstring, is Malinga. Those eyes have seen happier days
44.2
Malinga to Mohammad Amir, 1 wide, bouncer…oh and it’s too short, this is a wide
Farhad Aslam: “On 60th birthday of the greatest street fighter in cricket, another street fighter from Karachi is showing the glimpses of Miandad.”
44.1
Malinga to Sarfraz Ahmed, 1 run, overpitched inswinger at the toes, clipped to deep square
Malinga. Back for one last heartbreak? Silly mid-on in place.
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
This is not fair…
Now we have to go through semis
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
haha. Yep! Lets see what happens there…
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Hoooioo. We won
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
told you guys
#PakistanZindabad](http://gupshup.org/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=PakistanZindabad)
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
Amir played his role. He need to be praised.
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
True. He did.
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
:hula:
Re: ICC CT 2017 | Sri Lanka vs Pakistan | 12th June, 2017 | Cardiff -
You were saying. 