Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
^^Zarvan ali, bhai off track posts karna chor do.
First I am not Zarvan Ali my name is Mukarram secondly it is not an off post you wrote something about the meat eating of Muslims to which I responded that even your Religion allows it
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
^^ Ok. so tell me where did i write anything about meat eating?
you dont even know my views on that.
if you cannot pull out my "meat eating" post then please zarvan/mukarram bhai hume apne gyan se baksh do.
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
^^ See like i said i can make up facts like you guys. i dont know what they teach in madarassa but fact is far from fiction in your mind. if you think what he said was fact and fine then first thing you should do is start reading some books instead of wasting our time on public discussions or go back to primary school. Also you should be fine with hearing some "facts" from me too.
I am trying very hard not to stoop down to sindsagar's level. you know i have lot of tolerence and you get heart burns very easily. Had i said the same thing and replaced one animal with another, urine with some other bodily fluid land stuck it to your religion then would you still call it **fact **my friend.
respect is give and take relationship my friend. if you dont respect mine then you shouldnt expect any respect from me.
I am talking about this quote you mentioned Animals so I though you are referring to eating of meat and I repeat again I am Mukarram and who the hell is Zarvan Ali I am fed up of people calling me Zarvan Ali
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
^^ So you were wrong in your assumption. apologies accepted. next time please read the post and title of the thread before commenting.
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
If mullah like that had his way probably all paper-printers will be killed because they print “Mohammed” on their paper which is eventually trashed, burnt, “disrespected” etc.
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
^^ See like i said i can make up facts like you guys. i dont know what they teach in madarassa but fact is far from fiction in your mind. if you think what he said was fact and fine then first thing you should do is start reading some books instead of wasting our time on public discussions or go back to primary school. Also you should be fine with hearing some "facts" from me too.
I am trying very hard not to stoop down to sindsagar's level. you know i have lot of tolerence and you get heart burns very easily. Had i said the same thing and replaced one animal with another, urine with some other bodily fluid land stuck it to your religion then would you still call it **fact **my friend.
respect is give and take relationship my friend. if you dont respect mine then you shouldnt expect any respect from me.
If you do not know what they teach in madarsaahs then why even worry about mentioning? ;)
I repeat he said the fact. You must have read the responses on that forum he quoted I am sure.
Anyways, nevermind.
The discussion is about what you wrote in first post and you should stick to that from now on
...and let's see what kind of law you were talking about and how you defend law to be made on making people eat at certain restaurants compulsory. :)
Please do that! Please!
P.S. Why don't you write an examplary law like that with the language of the law you would like?
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
i know what they teach in madarassa. you are a living proof of that.
regarding "real facts" you dont have guts to hear them. ;)
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
So why did you say you did not know what they teach? 
I know what you would say,… heard those real facts so many times.
Now again on topic:
Waiting for you to draft the law you proposed in first post. 
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
good for you. i hope you wernet looking for justification of those fats outside your realm. ;)
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
good for you. good for you , now you see the light.
Already conceded? :)
What law you wanted against such a horrible discrmination of not eating at certain restaurants? ;)
Admit it. You said something which even you are not able to defend. Next time think before you rant and scream discrimination!discrimination!
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
what are you talking about. dont put your words in my mouth. when did i say that?
there is nothing i cannot defend if i believe in it. you want me to defend something you made up in your mind.
not gonna happen buddy.
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
Well To be fair to you Diwana, since you are not the first person to think that way i will accept that my first post was a bit confusing.
hareem said the same thing but in a nicer way. i explained myself to her in post 15 of this thread. I would have noticed the problem with my first post sooner but sindsagar had to derail this thread.
please read mypost no 15 and let me know if still there is any confusion. 
Re: ‘How could you serve breakfast to a Hindu?’
Glad to see you mallowed down. You were not nice when challenged me that I would not have guts to hear about ‘real facts’, and in fact I am always ready to hear those, outside this thread. You actually could not handle the fact presented by Sindsagar. Mods helped you there. And then you brought madarsah teaching in between too. 
Now that you have presented what you exactly wanted to say in first post.
Here is something for you to understand.
There are a lot of people in this world who for whatever reason do not like to eat outside and even when they do they select partcular restaurants based on their preferences which could be religious, ethnic or racial.
This trend goes with any person from any religion, ethnic background or race, and respect needs to be given to personal choice…whatever that may be.
There can never be a law to make people forgoe this fundamental right.
Now:
The article is written by a very ‘sensitive’ person who supposedly witnessed an event where a ‘religious man’ (one person out of millions that we know) said something to a restaurant owner. A persoonal act indeed. Most religious people just do not even bother to tell the owners. They would just not eat there.
Most people when they see this event would use common sense and understand perfectly that an individual act here does not mean anything whatsoever when someone is allegely trying to question the owner.
This article writer went ahead and made a big deal about it and published it. Just like you without using common sense and based on what you HEARD made a conclusion as if the reason for non-muslim restaurant owners to allegedly failed in business id dscrimination or hatred.
Pakistani who love to eat out in these days would eat anything regardless of the source.
They would accept an unknown south african imam fatwa and will eat imported meat (the source of which is not known to them) in the form of burgers.
Some gullible people here in haste decided to hate mullahs in general…the real intentioon of the article.
There is a lot of this garbage being published by so called broadminded and enlightened ‘journalists’.
My last post in this thread. 