Re: History of Pakistan since 3000 BC
Sometimes I think it would have been better if partition would never have been accepted by Nehru.
There should have been a civil war, if already a million died, so what if another 5 million were killed - it would have settled things once and for all, and stopped this constant fighting & bitterness between us.
The American civil war was bloody - but atleast they are strong & united today.
The partition or a civil war in the sub-continent without a partition is simply not comparable to the American civil war.
In the American civil war, the majority on both sides were white anglo-saxon and that is why they were able to reconcile their differences after the civil war.
In the sub-continent, the muslim-hindu divide is big and can never be reconciled. A bloody civil war instead of partition in 1947 could have possibly led to the sub-continent being further partitioned into a doxen different countries