Government, MMA sign agreement on LFO (MERGED)

Just as I had long predicted…:slight_smile:

Government, MMA sign agreement on LFO

Government and the Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) Wednesday reached an agreement on the Legal Framework Order (LFO) which was signed by Chowdery Shujaat Hussain, S M Zafar, Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Liaquat Baloch. The agreement was signed at the residence of Chowdery Shujaat Hussain. Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali also attended the signing ceremony. The MMA leadership is currently addressing a press conference about details of the agreement.

Malik ji, this agreement was very much predicted. Infact, according to my sources, this agreement was actually suppose to take place some time in September, but because of some minor technicalities, it was delayed....Anyway, good news for Pakistan.

Hopefully now stability can come in Pakistan, and we can concentrate on making the lives of the common man better, rather then indulging in cheap politics.

NA passes 17th Amendment Bill

Is it the beginning of a new era of totalitarian dictatorship in Pakistan?

ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly on Sunday evening adopted Article 58(2)b of the Constitution by a two-thirds majority to pave the way for the passage of the 17th Constitutional Amendment Bill and a clause-by-clause discussion on it will continue today.

Two hundred and thirty-six members voted in favour and 46 against the constitutional amendment, which empowers the president to dismiss the Assembly and refer the matter to the Supreme Court within 15 days after the dissolution. The Supreme Court shall decide the reference within 30 days and its decision shall be final.

The National Assembly also passed an amendment to Article 112 of the Constitution, which empowers provincial governors to dismiss provincial assemblies and refer the matter to the Supreme Court within 15 days after their dissolution, with the previous approval of the president and the Supreme Court shall decide the reference within 30 days.

The only amendment to the constitutional bill passed unanimously by the treasury and opposition was to remove the provision to set up the National Security Council (NSC) under the Constitution. However, the MMA still had certain reservations and asked the government to clear the ambiguities today.

While empowering the president to make constitutional appointments including those of the services chiefs in consultation with the prime minister, the house rejected a proposal to make it binding on the president to act in accordance with the advice of the prime minister. The house also approved the inclusion of the Local Government Ordinance (LGO) in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution for a period of another six years starting from the day the Constitution is amended with the approval of both houses of parliament.

The house rejected a proposed amendment by Aitzaz Ahsan to Clause 2 of the bill providing for separation of offices of the president and chief of the army staff with an overwhelming majority of 236 votes. Only 46 MNAs voted in favour.

During the proceedings, the Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy (ARD) was critical of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal “taking a u-turn” on the Legal Framework Order (LFO), saying the MMA had accepted the LFO as part of the Constitution.

The constitutional bill did not seek to amend provisions providing for a joint electoral system, increase in the number of the seats in the Senate, NA and provincial assemblies, reserve seats for women, change in educational qualifications, suggesting that all these and other provisions had been accepted as part of the Constitution under the LFO.

PPP-P’s Aitzaz Ahsan, PML-N’s Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan and their colleagues vehemently opposed the amendments which sought to empower the president and place him on top of every institution in this country. “The passage of Article 58(2)b will threaten the supremacy of parliament,” Mr Ahsan said.

He said Khwaja Nazimuddin, Maulvi Tameezuddin and Feroz Khan Noon fell victims to such provisions in the constitution, adding that it was the same clause which encouraged MNAs and senators to shift political loyalties in the past. “The members ditched Nawaz Sharif, Benazir Bhutto and Muhammad Khan Junejo,” he said.

Makhdoom Amin Fahim said the Bill was being passed under an “unholy alliance”.

He was critical of the government and said the treasury with the support of the MMA was endorsing everything blindly. “The nation was told that the proposed bill was aimed to amend the 1973 Constitution but the LFO-amended Constitution was being amended in reality.” Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said the passage of Article 58(2)b was a death warrant for the National Assembly. “No government completed its term from 1985 to 1998 because of this article”, he added. The house completed the second reading of all nine clauses of the proposed bill.

link

Re: NA passes 17th Amendment Bill


[QUOTE]
Originally posted by shawaiz: *
*
Makhdoom Amin Fahim said the Bill was being passed under an “unholy alliance”.

He was critical of the government and said the treasury with the support of the MMA was endorsing everything blindly.
[/QUOTE]


Does this mean Pakistan does not have an elected government? Is MMA not part of the coaltion and its members not elected by the people of Pakistan?

I am sorry if the above is a silly. I am just curious to understand more about Pakistani politics and the current set-up.?

Deep analysis of President Musharraf and MMA LFO agreement. :slight_smile:

Musharraf and the MMA

**The package of amendments to Pakistan’s constitution that have just been approved by parliament legitimise all the actions and deeds of General Pervez Musharraf since he seized power in a military coup four years ago.

It also appears to make him one of the most powerful presidents in the history of Pakistan, a country that, in formal terms, has a parliamentary form of government. **

As a military ruler, General Musharraf had already declared himself as president in 2001.

But since then he has remained conscious of the fact that, without the necessary endorsement by parliament, all his decisions would remain questionable.

**He has played his cards well. **

In the end, the groups that have always pretended to be his biggest critics - the Islamic parties - have bailed him out by providing the constitutional legitimacy that he so badly needed.

  • **No prior consultation **

From President Musharraf’s point of view the most crucial clause that has been added to the Constitution is Article 270-AA, which validates all his actions since his 1999 coup.

It reads: **“The Proclamation of Emergency of October 14, 1999, all President’s Orders, Ordinances, Chief Executive’s Orders… shall not be called in question in any court or forum on any ground whatsoever”. **

The alliance of hardline Islamic parties, the MMA, had given the impression that their agreement with the government would curtail some of the powers General Musharraf had assumed for himself.

However, he will continue to remain a very strong head of the state.

**General Musharraf will be president until 2008. He will also stay on as head of the army for at least one year.

He will have the authority to dismiss Pakistan’s national and provincial assemblies without first consulting the supreme court.

He will also be able to continue with his social and economic reforms and determine Pakistan’s regional and international policy goals.

Later on he will also be able to form a National Security Council that will directly involve the armed forces in the government’s formal decision-making process.

The only significant concession he has made to the Islamists is to shed his military uniform by December 2004 - that is a verbal agreement.**


***With President Musharraf now having his required legitimacy, he is in a position to crackdown on Islamic extremists with greater zeal, even at the cost of annoying the Islamic political alliance. ***

When I met Musharraf this past June, I did ask him a question about which post{Presidency or COAS} will he quit. And his answer was the same as he said to Ted Koppel in the interview i.e. he doesn’t like to hold up two office at the same time. One day, he’ll quit one post but declined to say further on this topic.

Now, after 6 months, he fulfilled his promise to what he said which goes back to '99. It’s another move by Musharraf to bring political stability in Pakistan.

Excellent analysis PT.

The Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) was the only opposition party which, contrary to the position it had taken against the Legal Framework Order (LFO), supported the government to further amend the LFO-amended Constitution.

Until the presentation of the 17th Constitutional Bill, approved by the National Assembly on Monday, it was considered that it would amend the constitution of October 12, 1999 incorporating those amendments that have been agreed by the government and the MMA in their recent agreement. Even when the Constitutional Bill was moved before the National Assembly, it was Qazi Hussain Ahmed who stood up to insist that the LFO was not part of the Constitution. He, therefore, demanded that the bill should be accordingly amended and re-tabled. It was never done and amazingly Qazi sahib never objected again.

Musharaf and his non-stop politics of intrigue and trick.

‘Musharraf lost the provincial assemblies’ vote’

By Iqbal Khattak

PESHAWAR: A Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarians (PPPP) leader on Saturday claimed that President Pervez Musharraf lost the vote of confidence on Thursday because he secured 124 value votes, instead of getting 131 out of a total of 260.

link

All articles posted must include a working URL link and the person posting these should also include their own comments and state what they wish to be discussed, especially in posts that start a new thread. Any posts without these requirements will be removed.