Re: Future of pakistan next 2-3 years.
That is what MQM has done in this election. You have to read two threads running on this MQM's dhandly in the election. Looked like they continued this practice of dhandli and ghunda gardi as in the past.
If you cannot accept defeat gracefully and could not bear overwhelming victory in Karachi of most popular party of Karachi, than please do not cry :). Crying is bad for health and if you would cry on victory of MQM in Karachi, than you would be crying all your life, as that would happen all your life, because of popularity of MQM is increasing day by day, and maybe in future you will see other parts of Pakistan under their domination too, that includes Punjab :). You should respect the vote bank of parties. What do you think, all parties are like PPP and PML(N) who survive in politics because of lies and dhandli?
[quote]
Shabash hay aap ko. How can you give such a statement without any facts and figures? Can you prove this? I think you forget when Ayub Khan in his last days said "in muhajron ko boryoun main band kar ke samamdar main penkho! His son killed a number of muhajirs and took salute from pathan taxi drivers in Lalu Khet. Later Yahya Khan's military was involved in genocide, rape, murder, destroying infra structure, looting own state bank etc, resulting breakup of the country, and you say their period was better than politicians. Shabahs hay aap ki soch par.
[/quote]
Well, that was some of the few incidences of suppression and intolerance during Ayub Khan. Other being action in Balochistan against Babu Nowroz (sardar of Zarakzai tribe), who started struggle in balochistan for his right, and once subdued (well, made to surrender on wrong promises), was executed by Ayub Khan.
As for Yahya, his action in Bangladesh was unfortunate but circumstances created by Bhutto that resulted in confrontation between Awami League and government of the time was main reasons behind that wrong, else Yahya I believed was willing to hand over power to political parties. So, one can say that it was not due to military suppression and intolerance but was political matter and military messed it up.
Well, continuous suppression by any military ruler happened is by Zia, who used military to suppress people of interior Sindh (supporters of PPP). Plus he developed a culture of intolerance and suppression in the name of Islam. That is all.
None of military regime suppressed peaceful population as matter of policy continuously throughout their regime, just to rule and victimise opponents. This honour is with Z A Bhutto who created FSF and used government forces (including FSF) to suppress all who oppose him as well as people of other political parties and innocent civilians.
Nawaz and BeNazir followed what Bhutto left, and both suppressed their opponents and victimised them for political reasons.