[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Thap: *
Who needs smart bombs when you got smart leaders right?
[/QUOTE]
Smart leaders like Saddam who had the habit of making people opposing him disappear forever? How smart was he in opposing coalition military might?
Hmmm I think you were standing on your head when reading my last post; although great for blood flow not all that advisable in forming coherent replies.
Maybe Bush could have been smarter in achieving his political aims, he sure as sh*t didn't expect this to take this long and galvanise global opposition against US foreign policy.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Mughals had smart bombs?
[/QUOTE]
No Imdad I was refering to wars and invasions in which there was the utmost consideration or avoidance of unnecessary damage.
BTW Islamic History is not just mughals.....it goes way past that. About a thousand years.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Thap: *
Maybe Bush could have been smarter in achieving his political aims, he sure as sh*t didn't expect this to take this long and galvanise global opposition against US foreign policy.
[/QUOTE]
Again you have nothing of substance to say. 3 weeks against a much less sophisticated yet larger army and the US is just at Baghdad's doorsteps and you call this a bad war? 50+ US deaths with 20,000+ Iraqi soldiers dead. The war is going better then expected.
Fayax, please read Islamic history as you have very little knowledge on how many people died under the sword.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Again you have nothing of substance to say. 3 weeks against a much less sophisticated yet larger army and the US is just at Baghdad's doorsteps and you call this a bad war? 50+ US deaths with 20,000+ Iraqi soldiers dead. The war is going better then expected.
Fayax, please read Islamic history as you have very little knowledge on how many people died under the sword.
[/QUOTE]
Please dont behave like a kid. Read the islamic history and dont tell me that you dont know about the only invasion in the history of the world that had no bloodshed. Before you start praising other armies of today and using the word "never"....please read. I will discuss issues with a learned person and a well read person. But with the likes of you......I dont.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Fayax, please read Islamic history as you have very little knowledge on how many people died under the sword.
[/QUOTE]
Yes but they were Kafir, hardly the same.
Im a wally,
50 US soldiers died on the first day stubbing their toes on the way out of their bunks at role call.
Agian, you have nothing to say.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Seminole: *
NEVER in the history of warfare has a nation used so much care to avoid civilian casualties as has the US in this conflict. And NEVER in the history of the world, or even in one's imagination, has there been the type of precision weaponry being used by the US.
[/QUOTE]
Clap clap.... great achievement indeed. Do you think there was a chance that US could intentionally cleanse Iraq and get away with it?