You yourself proved armys intention was not to target or kill Babloo, if you 've brain nd can read the whole news it is clearly mentioned there "Army fired scores of rubber bullets to control the situation but that did not work. When a group of youth tried to ransack our bunker at Gojwara we opened fire. Our men might have opened fire at Nowhatta too which caused Babloo’s death. We regret this incident"
Now go and do survey, In this kind of situation it can be happened anywhere in the world. Army doesn't kill people just for "FUN"
Judging from the fact that you seem utterly incapable of piecing together a coherent sentence in the English language, I'm going to assume your reading comprehension levels are equally poor. Go back and reread the article. The terrorists allege that one of their dens was being ransacked at Gojwara, and that's why they decided to indiscriminately open fire on the unarmed protesters there with live bullets. The two young men were murdered in Nauhatta, a completely different neighborhood.
As for the second part of your response, outside of India and Israel, opening fire on stone-throwing protesters with live ammunition is considered an egregious violation of basic human rights. In 2005, when tens of thousands of rioting youths took to the streets across France, ultimately causing 200 million Euros worth of damage, the French authorities managed to handle the situation without killing a single rioter. This is of course a foreign concept to the Indian scum who have been attacking Kashmir for decades now. Being a apologist for Indian state-sponsored terror, I would hardly expect you to understand.