AAM gets 3 guys who are not usually good enough scorers to even be in Hi-Techs starting lineup.
AAM gives up 60 points at RB and WR to gain 48 points at QB. He'll probably lose a point or two picking up a DB from free agents too.
[/QUOTE]
you play matchups in fantasy, dear.
60 points what are you talking about ?
tomlinson is performing sub par for a while now. well i do have my faith on him and i belive he can pick it up so he is in the deal. and for owens well how big of a day he can get ? 20 ? yeah can't top 20 and chances of that hapening are 1 in 16. but yeah he sure gets me atleast 10 points on avg which is pretty good and will help my team.
so basically the trade is for owens rest are fillings.
about my players
well you go with the hot hand
plummer is on fire lately and can burn any team. and agian dunn same thing if not better but he performs like 1st half good enuf.
anyways all i'm saying the point of u making its not equal value is bunch of crap.
no need to get fiesty on that. i just proposed this trade havent heard from aam so who knows it will happen or not.
but sounds fair enuf to me.
trades are suppose 2 make ur team strong last time i checked thats how it works.
A trade is supposed to improve BOTH teams. A trade that improves one at the expense of another is not a fair trade. It makes sense for you to trade Plummer as his points are wasted on your bench. It makes sense for AAM to try to pick up points at QB. But lets look at your trade.
Net result is that AAM loses 13.5 points and you gain 59.5 points at WR and RB losing nothing by trading Plummer. I've got no problem with you getting the better end of a trade since you were sharp enough to stash Plummer on your bench. BUT, AAM ought to at least break even or gain a little too.
Exchange Harrison (65) for Moulds (50.5) and AAM at least gains 1 point in the transaction and you still win the trade big time by adding 45 points at WR and RB.
you can get rid of a QB by just waiving him(Jeff Garcia in this case - i don’t get why you have on the roster?) - would u be willing to do the trade QB for TE? i’ll be willing to take Gates for Big Ben…ok?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *
Exchange Harrison (65) for Moulds (50.5) and AAM at least gains 1 point in the transaction and you still win the trade big time by adding 45 points at WR and RB.
[/QUOTE]
good point, even my white friends laughed at me when I told them the trade. They didn't see the sense of Moulds. Give me Harrison.
Your already gonna get the best reciever TO. And the groin injury that has been holding LT back to like 1 TD and around 60 yards per game will get better after his bye week this week.
aam listen dude make up ur mind
u the one who wanted moulds. i'be going away for weekend so decide.
well if u want harrison then i have to change trade.
look at new offer and either accept ot decline enuf with the waiting game.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by High-Tech: *
stooges wake up harrington is not in the trade.
aam listen dude make up ur mind
u the one who wanted moulds. i'be going away for weekend so decide.
well if u want harrison then i have to change trade.
look at new offer and either accept ot decline enuf with the waiting game.
[/QUOTE]
Hey Hi-Tech. What are you, just a fast talking salesman? The reason for AAM getting Plummer is to replace Harrington in his starting lineup. Thus, the value to him is the increase in points he gets by replacing Harrington with Plummer.
It's clear that you are not interessted in making even a halfway fair trade with AAM if you won't exchange Harrison for Moulds.
AAM: If you can wait until after this weekend's game, I'd probably give you a better deal than Hi-Tech. Something like Randy Moss, Curtis Martin and Tim Rattay for Owens and Tomlinson.
Hey Hi-Tech. What are you, just a fast talking salesman? The reason for AAM getting Plummer is to replace Harrington in his starting lineup. Thus, the value to him is the increase in points he gets by replacing Harrington with Plummer.
It's clear that you are not interessted in making even a halfway fair trade with AAM if you won't exchange Harrison for Moulds.
AAM: If you can wait until after this weekend's game, I'd probably give you a better deal than Hi-Tech. Something like Randy Moss, Curtis Martin and Tim Rattay for Owens and Tomlinson.
[/QUOTE]
you are right who can argue about the great arm of rattay. he completed more passes in a game beating likes of montana and young what a niner. and c mart , pen is down and schedule is getting tougher gota be tuff on old bones. moss yeah if he is helathy then he worth tomlinson n owens alone.
you are right who can argue about the great arm of rattay. he completed more passes in a game beating likes of montana and young what a niner. and c mart , pen is down and schedule is getting tougher gota be tuff on old bones. moss yeah if he is helathy then he worth tomlinson n owens alone.
[/QUOTE]
Who you kidding. You'd trade me Plummer, Dunn and Moulds for Moss and Martin in a heartbeat (never mind adding Rattay to the deal).
The point is that you are way off in the value you are willing to give up to AAM for Owens and Tomlinson. Give him Harrison and make it an almost-fair deal instead of trying to rape him.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by High-Tech: *
read my comments about c mart
he is done my friend done
now stop this nonesense
u can have owens and tomlinson
akona matata
[/QUOTE]
I just need to whoop on your ass this weekend with what I've got before pulling the trigger on a trade like that. I can't afford Tomlinson's bye this week and need to keep C. Martin's 91 points in my lineup. He gives me a serious edge over any of your running backs (the best of which is Dunn with his meager 63.5 points).
ahahhaha whats wrong with u dawg
y would I ever drop Garcia, he has more than 70 points. Also, I dont need Ben, I have enough QB’s. Why would u even offer me that?
As I stated above, it's still lopsided in favor of Hi-Tek but with Harrison added, it is not so lopsided that you should veto the trade.
Hi-Tek now becomes a PROHIBITIVE favorite to squash the rest of the league from here on out. I will nonetheless thrash him this weekend and have my day in the sun.
hey lussi
can u reject the trade of larry fitzgerald for bubba franks...i meant to reject the trade and accidently accepted it..i already have a decent Tight end and i dont wanna give up on larry..thanks
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Sheraz CT: *
hey lussi
can u reject the trade of larry fitzgerald for bubba franks...i meant to reject the trade and accidently accepted it..i already have a decent Tight end and i dont wanna give up on larry..thanks
[/QUOTE]
ahahhaha whats wrong with u dawg
y would I ever drop Garcia, he has more than 70 points. Also, I dont need Ben, I have enough QB's. Why would u even offer me that?
[/QUOTE]
have you been following football lately? yeah Garcia gave you 70 points but Ben has 82 points with 11 tds and 5 int - compare that with Garcia stats...no sane football guru would tell you to start Garcia!
i gave you fair match value trade - hell if you don't like then fine..
my bad